7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Scoring haemophilic arthropathy on X-rays: improving inter- and intra-observer reliability and agreement using a consensus atlas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The radiological Pettersson score (PS) is widely applied for classification of arthropathy to evaluate costly haemophilia treatment. This study aims to assess and improve inter- and intra-observer reliability and agreement of the PS.

          Methods

          Two series of X-rays (bilateral elbows, knees, and ankles) of 10 haemophilia patients (120 joints) with haemophilic arthropathy were scored by three observers according to the PS (maximum score 13/joint). Subsequently, (dis-)agreement in scoring was discussed until consensus. Example images were collected in an atlas. Thereafter, second series of 120 joints were scored using the atlas. One observer rescored the second series after three months. Reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), agreement by limits of agreement (LoA).

          Results

          Median Pettersson score at joint level (PS joint) of affected joints was 6 (interquartile range 3–9). Using the consensus atlas, inter-observer reliability of the PS joint improved significantly from 0.94 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.91–0.96) to 0.97 (CI 0.96–0.98). LoA improved from ±1.7 to ±1.1 for the PS joint. Therefore, true differences in arthropathy were differences in the PS joint of >2 points. Intra-observer reliability of the PS joint was 0.98 (CI 0.97–0.98), intra-observer LoA were ±0.9 points.

          Conclusions

          Reliability and agreement of the PS improved by using a consensus atlas.

          Key Points

          Reliability of the Pettersson score significantly improved using the consensus atlas.

          The presented consensus atlas improved the agreement among observers.

          The consensus atlas could be recommended to obtain a reproducible Pettersson score.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4013-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

          In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A radiologic classification of hemophilic arthropathy.

            A new, exclusively radiologic classification of hemophilic arthropathy is based on a review of 54 patients who had had repeated radiologic examinations of all great joints before the institution of any specific treatment. In terms of a score, the severity of the arthropathy may be assessed in a single joint, in a single patient, or in a group of patients. Using the score system, the natural course of hemophilic arthropathy demonstrated that the severity of the arthropathy increased with age and degree of coagulation defect. All patients over 5 years of age with severe hemophilia were affected and the radiologic changes were progressive. There was a good correlation between the radiologically assessed severity of the arthropathy and the clinical findings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A longitudinal study of orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor-VIII-deficient haemophiliacs. The Orthopaedic Outcome Study Group.

              Arthropathy is the major cause of morbidity in haemophilia. In an attempt to establish optimal therapeutic regimens for persons with haemophilia, we hypothesized that no direct relationship exists between increasing factor dosage and orthopaedic outcomes over time. A longitudinal uncontrolled 6 year study was carried out. Ankles, knees and elbows of patients were studied using physical and X-ray examination scores. Bleeding episodes and treatment regimens were determined. The amount of time lost from work and school, as well as days in hospital, was also monitored. Twenty-one international haemophilia centres were used to accrue and follow patients over the 6 year period. Severe (< 1%) factor VIII deficient patients under the age of 25 without inhibitors were recruited into the study. The status of the six major joints of these patients were measured annually for mobility. X-ray evaluation of these joints was carried out at the beginning and end of the study. Using a World Federation of Haemophilia joint and X-ray score, stability, progression or regression of arthropathy was evaluated. Physical and X-ray examination scores increased significantly with age, and the number of joint bleeds were significant in determining the delta score. Approximately 10% of patients entered with all six joints normal. Of these, 50% remained so. Year-long prophylaxis significantly reduced the rate at which joints deteriorate both on physical (P = 0.02) and X-ray examination (P = < 0.001). Patients on prophylaxis had significantly fewer days lost from work or school, as well as fewer days spent in hospital (P = < 0.01). Higher doses of factor per se do not necessarily produce improved orthopaedic outcomes. However, full time prophylaxis is likely to produce the best orthopaedic outcome. The most critical factor for a good orthopaedic outcome is the reduction of joint bleeds.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31 88 75 50286 , w.foppen@umcutrecht.nl
                Journal
                Eur Radiol
                Eur Radiol
                European Radiology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0938-7994
                1432-1084
                24 September 2015
                24 September 2015
                2016
                : 26
                : 1963-1970
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, HP E01.132, Post Office Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Van Creveldkliniek, Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Article
                4013
                10.1007/s00330-015-4013-8
                4869743
                26403578
                d0f9d4be-7075-4f4d-be92-df6dcce64a7d
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 20 May 2015
                : 5 August 2015
                : 4 September 2015
                Categories
                Musculoskeletal
                Custom metadata
                © European Society of Radiology 2016

                Radiology & Imaging
                haemophilia,arthropathy,x-rays,reliability,agreement
                Radiology & Imaging
                haemophilia, arthropathy, x-rays, reliability, agreement

                Comments

                Comment on this article