29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers of mental health treatment utilization among first‐year college students: First cross‐national results from the WHO World Mental Health International College Student Initiative

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although mental disorders and suicidal thoughts‐behaviors (suicidal thoughts and behaviors) are common among university students, the majority of students with these problems remain untreated. It is unclear what the barriers are to these students seeking treatment.

          Aims

          The aim of this study is to examine the barriers to future help‐seeking and the associations of clinical characteristics with these barriers in a cross‐national sample of first‐year college students.

          Method

          As part of the World Mental Health International College Student (WMH‐ICS) initiative, web‐based self‐report surveys were obtained from 13,984 first‐year students in eight countries across the world. Clinical characteristics examined included screens for common mental disorders and reports about suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Multivariate regression models adjusted for socio‐demographic, college‐, and treatment‐related variables were used to examine correlates of help‐seeking intention and barriers to seeking treatment.

          Results

          Only 24.6% of students reported that they would definitely seek treatment if they had a future emotional problem. The most commonly reported reasons not to seek treatment among students who failed to report that they would definitely seek help were the preference to handle the problem alone (56.4%) and wanting to talk with friends or relatives instead (48.0%). Preference to handle the problem alone and feeling too embarrassed were also associated with significantly reduced odds of having at least some intention to seek help among students who failed to report that they would definitely seek help. Having 12‐month major depression, alcohol use disorder, and suicidal thoughts and behaviors were also associated with significantly reduced reported odds of the latter outcome.

          Conclusions

          The majority of first‐year college students in the WMH‐ICS surveys report that they would be hesitant to seek help in case of future emotional problems. Attitudinal barriers and not structural barriers were found to be the most important reported reasons for this hesitation. Experimental research is needed to determine whether intention to seek help and, more importantly, actual help‐seeking behavior could be increased with the extent to which intervention strategies need to be tailored to particular student characteristics. Given that the preference to handle problems alone and stigma and appear to be critical, there could be value in determining if internet‐based psychological treatments, which can be accessed privately and are often build as self‐help approaches, would be more acceptable than other types of treatments to student who report hesitation about seeking treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)

          This paper presents an overview of the World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and a discussion of the methodological research on which the development of the instrument was based. The WMH‐CIDI includes a screening module and 40 sections that focus on diagnoses (22 sections), functioning (four sections), treatment (two sections), risk factors (four sections), socio‐demographic correlates (seven sections), and methodological factors (two sections). Innovations compared to earlier versions of the CIDI include expansion of the diagnostic sections, a focus on 12‐month as well as lifetime disorders in the same interview, detailed assessment of clinical severity, and inclusion of information on treatment, risk factors, and consequences. A computer‐assisted version of the interview is available along with a direct data entry software system that can be used to keypunch responses to the paper‐and‐pencil version of the interview. Computer programs that generate diagnoses are also available based on both ICD‐10 and DSM‐IV criteria. Elaborate CD‐ROM‐based training materials are available to teach interviewers how to administer the interview as well as to teach supervisors how to monitor the quality of data collection. Copyright © 2004 Whurr Publishers Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care.

            The current combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan have involved U.S. military personnel in major ground combat and hazardous security duty. Studies are needed to systematically assess the mental health of members of the armed services who have participated in these operations and to inform policy with regard to the optimal delivery of mental health care to returning veterans. We studied members of four U.S. combat infantry units (three Army units and one Marine Corps unit) using an anonymous survey that was administered to the subjects either before their deployment to Iraq (n=2530) or three to four months after their return from combat duty in Iraq or Afghanistan (n=3671). The outcomes included major depression, generalized anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which were evaluated on the basis of standardized, self-administered screening instruments. Exposure to combat was significantly greater among those who were deployed to Iraq than among those deployed to Afghanistan. The percentage of study subjects whose responses met the screening criteria for major depression, generalized anxiety, or PTSD was significantly higher after duty in Iraq (15.6 to 17.1 percent) than after duty in Afghanistan (11.2 percent) or before deployment to Iraq (9.3 percent); the largest difference was in the rate of PTSD. Of those whose responses were positive for a mental disorder, only 23 to 40 percent sought mental health care. Those whose responses were positive for a mental disorder were twice as likely as those whose responses were negative to report concern about possible stigmatization and other barriers to seeking mental health care. This study provides an initial look at the mental health of members of the Army and the Marine Corps who were involved in combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Our findings indicate that among the study groups there was a significant risk of mental health problems and that the subjects reported important barriers to receiving mental health services, particularly the perception of stigma among those most in need of such care. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              WHO world mental health surveys international college student project: Prevalence and distribution of mental disorders.

              Increasingly, colleges across the world are contending with rising rates of mental disorders, and in many cases, the demand for services on campus far exceeds the available resources. The present study reports initial results from the first stage of the WHO World Mental Health International College Student project, in which a series of surveys in 19 colleges across 8 countries (Australia, Belgium, Germany, Mexico, Northern Ireland, South Africa, Spain, United States) were carried out with the aim of estimating prevalence and basic sociodemographic correlates of common mental disorders among first-year college students. Web-based self-report questionnaires administered to incoming first-year students (45.5% pooled response rate) screened for six common lifetime and 12-month DSM-IV mental disorders: major depression, mania/hypomania, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, alcohol use disorder, and substance use disorder. We focus on the 13,984 respondents who were full-time students: 35% of whom screened positive for at least one of the common lifetime disorders assessed and 31% screened positive for at least one 12-month disorder. Syndromes typically had onsets in early to middle adolescence and persisted into the year of the survey. Although relatively modest, the strongest correlates of screening positive were older age, female sex, unmarried-deceased parents, no religious affiliation, nonheterosexual identification and behavior, low secondary school ranking, and extrinsic motivation for college enrollment. The weakness of these associations means that the syndromes considered are widely distributed with respect to these variables in the student population. Although the extent to which cost-effective treatment would reduce these risks is unclear, the high level of need for mental health services implied by these results represents a major challenge to institutions of higher education and governments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                david.ebert@fau.de
                Journal
                Int J Methods Psychiatr Res
                Int J Methods Psychiatr Res
                10.1002/(ISSN)1557-0657
                MPR
                International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1049-8931
                1557-0657
                09 May 2019
                June 2019
                : 28
                : 2 , WHO World Mental Health International College Student (WMH‐ICS) initiative ( doiID: 10.1002/mpr.v28.2 )
                : e1782
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen Germany
                [ 2 ] Universitair Psychiatrisch Centrum—Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (UPC‐KUL), Campus Gasthuisberg Leuven Belgium
                [ 3 ] Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy University of Ulm Ulm Germany
                [ 4 ] Department of Psychiatry Columbia University New York City New York
                [ 5 ] Health Services Research Unit IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona Spain
                [ 6 ] CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) Madrid Spain
                [ 7 ] Department of Psychology Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes Aguascalientes City Mexico
                [ 8 ] MRC Unit on Anxiety & Stress Disorders, Department of Psychiatry University of Stellenbosch Stellenbosch South Africa
                [ 9 ] Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 10 ] School of Education Boston University Boston Massachusetts
                [ 11 ] School of Psychology and Speech Pathology Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia
                [ 12 ] Department of Medical Sciences Ulster University Derry‐Londonderry UK
                [ 13 ] Department of Health Care Policy Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                David Daniel Ebert, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nürnberg, Nägelsbachstr. 25a, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.

                Email: david.ebert@ 123456fau.de

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6820-0146
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8189-301X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5497-2743
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3541-4989
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4831-2305
                Article
                MPR1782 IJMPR-Aug-2018-0074.R1
                10.1002/mpr.1782
                6522323
                31069905
                d1166696-9b23-4e58-ad65-0c80756f7ca2
                © 2019 The Authors International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 01 August 2018
                : 21 March 2019
                : 21 March 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Pages: 14, Words: 6026
                Funding
                Funded by: Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III—FEDER
                Award ID: PI13/00343
                Award ID: PI13/00506
                Funded by: Instituto de Salud Carlos III
                Award ID: CD12/00440
                Award ID: CM14/00125
                Funded by: Northern Ireland Public Health Agency
                Funded by: Bristol‐Myers Squibb
                Funded by: GlaxoSmithKline
                Funded by: Ortho‐McNeil Pharmaceutical
                Funded by: Pan American Health Organization
                Funded by: Fogarty International Center
                Award ID: FIRCA R03‐TW006481
                Funded by: US Public Health Service
                Award ID: R01 DA016558
                Award ID: R01‐MH069864
                Award ID: R13‐MH066849
                Funded by: Pfizer Foundation
                Funded by: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
                Funded by: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT)
                Award ID: CB‐2016‐01‐285548
                Funded by: Ulster University
                Funded by: Northern Ireland Public Health Agency (HSC R&D)
                Funded by: European Union Regional Development Fund (ERDF) EU Sustainable Competitiveness Programme for Northern Ireland
                Funded by: FPU
                Award ID: FPU15/05728
                Funded by: DIUE Generalitat de Catalunya
                Award ID: 2017 SGR 452
                Funded by: Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, PNSD
                Award ID: 2015I015
                Funded by: ISCIII
                Award ID: CD12/00440
                Award ID: CM14/00125
                Funded by: Ithemba Foundation
                Funded by: South African Medical Research Council
                Funded by: Protestants Fonds voor de Geestelijke Volksgezondheid
                Funded by: ZonMw
                Award ID: 636110005
                Funded by: BARMER
                Funded by: Eli Lilly and Company
                Award ID: IIT‐H6U‐BX‐I002
                Funded by: King Baudouin Foundation United States
                Award ID: 2014‐J2140150‐102905
                Funded by: Belgian Fund for Scientific Research
                Award ID: 1114717N
                Award ID: 11N0514N
                Award ID: 11N0516N
                Funded by: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
                Award ID: R56MH109566
                Award ID: R01MH070884
                Categories
                Special Issue
                Special Issues
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                mpr1782
                June 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.5 mode:remove_FC converted:17.07.2019

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                epidemiology,public mental health,service utilization,student,treatment gap

                Comments

                Comment on this article