1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      How does sacral modulation work best? Placement and programming techniques to maximize efficacy.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Since receiving approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in 1997, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become the recommended treatment of urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency, nonobstructive urinary retention, and fecal incontinence. The manufacturer has introduced different technical modifications while surgeons and researchers have adapted and published various innovations and alterations of the technique. This review summarizes the current knowledge and recommendations of SNM preoperative decision making, the implantation technique, and available programming parameters and algorithms based on MEDLINE research, manufacturer instructions, and the approach of an experienced neurourological team. The primary steps and technical aspects to optimize SNM efficacy were the introduction of the tined-lead electrode and the development of the InterStim II impulse generator (both developed by Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN). The initiation of the staged implantation technique for sequential evaluation and implantation with the definitive quadripolar electrode completes the treatment algorithm so that an increased responder rate of SNM for all indications can be achieved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Curr Urol Rep
          Current urology reports
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1534-6285
          1527-2737
          Oct 2011
          : 12
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
          Article
          10.1007/s11934-011-0204-2
          21710239
          d1534598-52ad-4e88-8dde-e385974977fa
          © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article