38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Is cancer a good way to die? A population-based survey among middle-aged and older adults in the United Kingdom

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Despite improved outcomes, cancer remains widely feared, often because of its association with a long and protracted death as opposed to the quick death that people associate with that other common cause of adult mortality: heart disease. Former editor-in-chief of the BMJ Richard Smith's view that ‘cancer is the best way to die’ therefore attracted much criticism. We examined middle-aged and older adults' agreement with this view and compared their attitudes towards dying from cancer versus heart disease in terms of which was a good death.

          Methods

          This study was part of an online survey (February 2015) in a United Kingdom (UK) population sample of 50- to 70-year olds (n = 391), with sampling quotas for gender and education. Five characteristics of ‘a good death’ were selected from the end-of-life literature. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of each characteristic for their own death to ensure their relevance to a population sample and the likelihood of each for death from cancer and heart disease. We also asked whether they agreed with Smith's view.

          Results

          At least 95% of respondents considered the selected five characteristics important for their own death. Death from cancer was rated as more likely to provide control over what happens (p < 0.001), control over pain and other symptoms (p < 0.01), time to settle affairs (p < 0.001), and time to say goodbye to loved ones (p < 0.001) compared with death from heart disease, but there were no differences in expectation of living independently until death (p > 0.05). Almost half (40%) agreed that cancer is ‘the best way to die’, with no differences by age (p = 0.40), gender (p = 0.85), or education (p = 0.27).

          Conclusion

          Despite the media commotion, a surprisingly high proportion of middle-aged and older adults viewed cancer as ‘the best way to die’ and rated cancer death as better than heart disease. Given that one in two of us are likely to be diagnosed with cancer, conversations about a good death from cancer may in a small way mitigate fear of cancer. Future research could explore variations by type of cancer or heart disease and by previous experience of these illnesses in others.

          Highlights

          • Cancer remains widely feared, because of its link with a long and painful death.

          • Many prefer to die from heart disease instead because it is considered ‘quick and neat’.

          • However, middle-aged and older adults seem more positive about dying from cancer than heart disease.

          • They rated cancer more positively on five characteristics of ‘a good death’.

          • In addition, 40% of them viewed cancer as ‘the best way to die’.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Self-Selection and Information Role of Online Product Reviews

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox: the implications of coronary candidacy for health education.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Advance Care Planning in palliative care: a systematic literature review of the contextual factors influencing its uptake 2008-2012.

              Advance Care Planning is an iterative process of discussion, decision-making and documentation about end-of-life care. Advance Care Planning is highly relevant in palliative care due to intersecting clinical needs. To enhance the implementation of Advance Care Planning, the contextual factors influencing its uptake need to be better understood. To identify the contextual factors influencing the uptake of Advance Care Planning in palliative care as published between January 2008 and December 2012. Databases were systematically searched for studies about Advance Care Planning in palliative care published between January 2008 and December 2012. This yielded 27 eligible studies, which were appraised using National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Quality Appraisal Checklists. Iterative thematic synthesis was used to group results. Factors associated with greater uptake included older age, a college degree, a diagnosis of cancer, greater functional impairment, being white, greater understanding of poor prognosis and receiving or working in specialist palliative care. Barriers included having non-malignant diagnoses, having dependent children, being African American, and uncertainty about Advance Care Planning and its legal status. Individuals' previous illness experiences, preferences and attitudes also influenced their participation. Factors influencing the uptake of Advance Care Planning in palliative care are complex and multifaceted reflecting the diverse and often competing needs of patients, health professionals, legislature and health systems. Large population-based studies of palliative care patients are required to develop the sound theoretical and empirical foundation needed to improve uptake of Advance Care Planning in this setting. © The Author(s) 2014.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Eur J Cancer
                Eur. J. Cancer
                European Journal of Cancer
                Elsevier Science Ltd
                0959-8049
                1879-0852
                1 March 2016
                March 2016
                : 56
                : 172-178
                Affiliations
                [1]Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [] Corresponding author: Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 020 7679 1735. c.vrinten@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                [1]

                Deceased October 20th 2015.

                Article
                S0959-8049(15)01174-0
                10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.018
                4788505
                26920822
                d18539ae-eb86-48ca-9695-24976c8804ad
                © 2016 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 September 2015
                : 3 December 2015
                : 10 December 2015
                Categories
                Original Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cancer,heart disease,attitude to death,end-of-life,public perceptions
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cancer, heart disease, attitude to death, end-of-life, public perceptions

                Comments

                Comment on this article