31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prognostic implications of aspiration pneumonia in patients with community acquired pneumonia: A systematic review with meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aspiration pneumonia is thought to be associated with a poor outcome in patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, there has been no systematic review regarding the impact of aspiration pneumonia on the outcomes in patients with CAP. This review was conducted using the MOOSE guidelines: Patients: patients defined CAP. Exposure: aspiration pneumonia defined as pneumonia in patients who have aspiration risk. Comparison: confirmed pneumonia in patients who were not considered to be at high risk for oral aspiration. Outcomes: mortality, hospital readmission or recurrent pneumonia. Three investigators independently identified published cohort studies from PubMed, CENTRAL database, and EMBASE. Nineteen studies were included for this systematic review. Aspiration pneumonia increased in-hospital mortality (relative risk, 3.62; 95% CI, 2.65–4.96; P < 0.001, seven studies) and 30-day mortality (3.57; 2.18–5.86; P < 0.001, five studies). In contrast, aspiration pneumonia was associated with decreased ICU mortality (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.26–0.60; P < 0.00001, four studies). Although there are insufficient data to perform a meta-analysis on long-term mortality, recurrent pneumonia, and hospital readmission, the few reported studies suggest that aspiration pneumonia is also associated with these poor outcomes. In conclusion, aspiration pneumonia was associated with both higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality in patients with CAP outside ICU settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis.

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quantitative aspiration during sleep in normal subjects.

            To determine the within-subject variability and to estimate the quantity of occult aspiration of nasopharyngeal secretions during sleep in normal humans. Prospective duplicate full-night sleep studies. Pulmonary sleep laboratory, university hospital. Ten normal male volunteers aged 22 to 55 years. Two full-night polysomnographic recordings with infusion of 2 mL/h radioactive 99mTc tracer into the nasopharynx through a small catheter during EEG-documented sleep. Standard lung scans were conducted immediately following final awakening. Aspiration was defined as the presence of radioactivity in the pulmonary parenchyma on two separate views. A mean sleep efficiency of 85.7 +/- 2.6% was found with no difference between the two study nights. A total of 5 of the 10 subjects studied had tracer evident in the pulmonary parenchyma following final awakening. Three had the tracer apparent following the first-night study and four had tracer apparent following the second-night study. Thus, two subjects aspirated on both nights. Comparing the subjects who aspirated with those who did not, no significant difference could be found for age, time spent in bed, sleep efficiency, apnea-hypopnea index, arousal plus awakening index, or percent of sleep time spent in a supine position. The quantities of tracer aspirated were on the order of magnitude of 0.01 to 0.2 mL. Aspiration measured by this technique occurs commonly in healthy young men during sleep, is unrelated to sleep quality, and is variable within subjects studied on more than one occasion. The quantity aspirated is of an order of magnitude likely to contain bacterial organisms in physiologically significant quantities.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Severe community-acquired pneumonia. Epidemiology and prognostic factors.

              Over a period of 4 consecutive yr, 92 nonimmunosuppressed patients (21 women and 71 men aged 53 +/- 16 yr, means = SD) with critical acute respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2, 209 +/- 9 mm Hg) caused by severe community-acquired pneumonia were admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of a general hospital. The most frequent underlying clinical condition was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (44 patients, 48%). A total of 56 patients (61%) required mechanical ventilation for a mean period of 10.7 +/- 12.5 days, 29 of them (52%) needing PEEP (9.9 +/- 3.8 cm H2O). A group of 23 (25%) patients had criteria of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A causal microorganism was identified in 48 patients (52%), the two most frequent etiologies being Streptococcus pneumoniae (14, 15%) and Legionella pneumophila (13, 14%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5, 5%) was always associated with bronchiectasis. Mortality due to severe community-acquired pneumonia was 22% (20 patients). According to univariate analysis, mortality was associated with anticipated death within 4 to 5 yr, inadequate antibiotic treatment before RICU admission, mechanical ventilation requirements, use of PEEP, FIO2 greater than 0.6, coexistence of ARDS, radiographic spread of the pneumonia during RICU admission, septic shock, bacteremia, and P. aeruginosa as the cause of the pneumonia. Further, recursive partitioning analysis selected two factors significantly related to the prognosis: the radiographic spread of the pneumonia during RICU admission and the presence of septic shock.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group
                2045-2322
                07 December 2016
                2016
                : 6
                : 38097
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine , 1217 East Marshall Street: KMSB, Room 215 Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA
                [2 ]Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Oita University Faculty of Medicine , 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
                [3 ]Clinical Research Center of Respiratory Medicine, Tenshindo Hetsugi Hospital , 5956 Nihongi, Nakahetsugi, Oita, 879-7761, Japan
                [4 ]Second Department of Internal Medicine, Nagasaki University School of Medicine , 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan
                [5 ]Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences , 757 Asahi-machi, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan
                [6 ]Department of Respiratory Medicine/Infectious Disease, Niigata City General Hospital , 463-7 Shumoku, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 950-1197, Japan
                [7 ]Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health , 1-1 Idaigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, 807-8555, Japan
                [8 ]Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Advanced Emergency and Critical Care Center, Hiroshima University Hospital , 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan
                [9 ]Center for Clinical Epidemiology, St. Luke’s Life Science Institute , 10-1 Akashicho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
                Author notes
                Article
                srep38097
                10.1038/srep38097
                5141412
                27924871
                d18ab14b-427f-47e0-a9ad-76b703abd029
                Copyright © 2016, The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 06 June 2016
                : 04 November 2016
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log