13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Global root traits (GRooT) database

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 1 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 1 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 19 , 3 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 24 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 11 , 12 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 31 , 2 , 51 , 1 , 10
      Global Ecology and Biogeography
      Wiley
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum.

          Wood performs several essential functions in plants, including mechanically supporting aboveground tissue, storing water and other resources, and transporting sap. Woody tissues are likely to face physiological, structural and defensive trade-offs. How a plant optimizes among these competing functions can have major ecological implications, which have been under-appreciated by ecologists compared to the focus they have given to leaf function. To draw together our current understanding of wood function, we identify and collate data on the major wood functional traits, including the largest wood density database to date (8412 taxa), mechanical strength measures and anatomical features, as well as clade-specific features such as secondary chemistry. We then show how wood traits are related to one another, highlighting functional trade-offs, and to ecological and demographic plant features (growth form, growth rate, latitude, ecological setting). We suggest that, similar to the manifold that tree species leaf traits cluster around the 'leaf economics spectrum', a similar 'wood economics spectrum' may be defined. We then discuss the biogeography, evolution and biogeochemistry of the spectrum, and conclude by pointing out the major gaps in our current knowledge of wood functional traits.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              TRY plant trait database – enhanced coverage and open access

              Plant traits-the morphological, anatomical, physiological, biochemical and phenological characteristics of plants-determine how plants respond to environmental factors, affect other trophic levels, and influence ecosystem properties and their benefits and detriments to people. Plant trait data thus represent the basis for a vast area of research spanning from evolutionary biology, community and functional ecology, to biodiversity conservation, ecosystem and landscape management, restoration, biogeography and earth system modelling. Since its foundation in 2007, the TRY database of plant traits has grown continuously. It now provides unprecedented data coverage under an open access data policy and is the main plant trait database used by the research community worldwide. Increasingly, the TRY database also supports new frontiers of trait-based plant research, including the identification of data gaps and the subsequent mobilization or measurement of new data. To support this development, in this article we evaluate the extent of the trait data compiled in TRY and analyse emerging patterns of data coverage and representativeness. Best species coverage is achieved for categorical traits-almost complete coverage for 'plant growth form'. However, most traits relevant for ecology and vegetation modelling are characterized by continuous intraspecific variation and trait-environmental relationships. These traits have to be measured on individual plants in their respective environment. Despite unprecedented data coverage, we observe a humbling lack of completeness and representativeness of these continuous traits in many aspects. We, therefore, conclude that reducing data gaps and biases in the TRY database remains a key challenge and requires a coordinated approach to data mobilization and trait measurements. This can only be achieved in collaboration with other initiatives.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                GEB
                Global Ecology and Biogeography
                Global Ecol Biogeogr
                Wiley
                1466822X
                September 09 2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv); Halle-Jena-Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
                [2 ]Biodiversity, Macroecology & Biogeography, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology; University of Goettingen; Göttingen Germany
                [3 ]Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation; Wageningen University; Wageningen The Netherlands
                [4 ]Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station; CNRS; University of Toulouse III; Moulis France
                [5 ]Environmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science Institute; Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Oak Ridge Tennessee USA
                [6 ]Center for Tree Science; The Morton Arboretum Lisle Illinois USA
                [7 ]Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry; Jena Germany
                [8 ]IBG-2: Plant Sciences; Forschungszentrum Jülich; Jülich Germany
                [9 ]Department of Biological Sciences; Macquarie University; North Ryde New South Wales Australia
                [10 ]Systematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity; Institute of Biology; Leipzig University; Leipzig Germany
                [11 ]Institute of Biology; Freie University Berlin; Berlin Germany
                [12 ]Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB); Berlin Germany
                [13 ]Soil Biology; Wageningen University; Wageningen The Netherlands
                [14 ]Noble Research Institute; Ardmore Oklahoma USA
                [15 ]Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden; Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg; Halle Germany
                [16 ]Department of Botany; University of Wyoming; Laramie Wyoming USA
                [17 ]Plant Ecology; Albrecht-von-Haller Institute for Plant Sciences; University of Goettingen; Göttingen Germany
                [18 ]CEFE, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPHE, IRD; Montpellier France
                [19 ]Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences; University of Manchester; Manchester United Kingdom
                [20 ]International Center of Tropical Biodiversity; Florida International University; Miami Florida USA
                [21 ]Great Lakes Forestry Centre; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; Sault Ste Marie Ontario Canada
                [22 ]Department of Geography; King’s College London; London United Kingdom
                [23 ]Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F); Frankfurt am Main Germany
                [24 ]Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences; University of Toronto Scarborough; Toronto Ontario Canada
                [25 ]Area de Biodiversidad y Conservación; Universidad Rey Juan Carlos; Spain
                [26 ]Institute for Biology and Environmental Sciences; University of Oldenburg; Oldenburg Germany
                [27 ]Department of Biology, Ecology and Biodiversity; Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Brussels Belgium
                [28 ]Centro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación; CIDE-CSIC; Valencia Spain
                [29 ]Department of Biology; Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Trondheim Norway
                [30 ]Asian School of Environment; Nanyang Technological University; Singapore
                [31 ]Environmental Biology Department; Institute of Environmental Sciences; Leiden University; Leiden The Netherlands
                [32 ]Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones; University of Goettingen; Göttingen Germany
                [33 ]Center for Ecosystem Science and Society (ECOSS); Northern Arizona University; Flagstaff Arizona USA
                [34 ]Department of Biological Sciences; Northern Arizona University; Flagstaff Arizona USA
                [35 ]Jonah Ventures; Boulder Colorado USA
                [36 ]Systems Ecology; Department of Ecological Science; Faculty of Science; Vrije Universiteit; Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [37 ]Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics; University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [38 ]Environmental Science Group; Wageningen University & Research; Wageningen The Netherlands
                [39 ]Department of Geography; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Berlin Germany
                [40 ]Department of Plant Sciences; University of Saskatchewan; Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada
                [41 ]Faculty of Biology; Moscow State Lomonosov University; Moscow Russia
                [42 ]CREAF; Cerdanyola del Vallès; Catalonia Spain
                [43 ]CSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB; Bellaterra Catalonia Spain
                [44 ]Department of Forest Resources; University of Minnesota; St Paul Minnesota USA
                [45 ]Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment; Western Sydney University; Richmond New South Wales Australia
                [46 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology; University of California Los Angeles; Los Angeles California USA
                [47 ]Département de Biologie; Université de Sherbrooke; Sherbrooke Quebec Canada
                [48 ]Natural History Museum; University of Tartu; Tartu Estonia
                [49 ]Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences; University of Tartu; Tartu Estonia
                [50 ]National Museum of Natural Sciences; MNCN, CSIC; Madrid Spain
                [51 ]Biology Department; Duke University; Durham North Carolina USA
                Article
                10.1111/geb.13179
                d1bff24f-9743-4f76-9b19-c95e3dab0929
                © 2020

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article