3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical outcomes of patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma and intestinal-type papilla of Vater adenocarcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) and intestinal-type papilla of Vater adenocarcinoma (it-PVA) are rare malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract. Current therapeutic options are translated nowadays from treatment strategies for patients with colorectal cancer due to histopathological similarities.

          AIM

          To retrospectively investigate the clinical outcome of patients with DA and it-PVA.

          METHODS

          All patients with DA and it-PVA diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 were included at two academic centers in the Netherlands. All patients with histopathologically-confirmed DA or it-PVA were eligible for inclusion. Clinical outcome was compared between DA and it-PVA per disease stage. In the subgroup of stage IV disease, survival after local treatment of oligometastases was compared with systemic therapy or supportive care.

          RESULTS

          In total, 155 patients with DA and it-PVA were included. Patients with it-PVA more often presented with stage I disease, while DA was more often diagnosed at stage IV ( P < 0.001). Of all patients, 79% were treated with curative intent. The median survival was 39 mo, and no difference in survival was found for patients with DA and it-PVA after stratification for disease stage. Seven (23%) of 31 patients with synchronous stage IV disease underwent resection of the primary tumor, combined with local treatment of oligometastases. Local treatment of metastases was associated with an overall survival of 37 mo, compared to 14 and 6 mo for systemic therapy and supportive care, respectively.

          CONCLUSION

          Survival of patients with DA and it-PVA is comparable per disease stage. These results suggest a potential benefit for local treatment strategies in selected patients with oligometastases, although additional prospective studies are needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rates and patterns of recurrence following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: an international multi-institutional analysis of 1669 patients.

          To investigate rates and patterns of recurrence in patients following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis. Outcomes following surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis have largely focused on overall survival. Contemporary data on rates and patterns of recurrence following surgery for colorectal liver metastasis are limited. One thousand six hundred sixty-nine patients treated with surgery (resection +/- radiofrequency ablation [RFA]) for colorectal liver metastasis between 1982 and 2008 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Clinicopathologic data, recurrence patterns, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed. At the time of the initial liver-directed surgery, surgical treatment was resection only (90.2%), resection plus RFA (8.0%), or RFA alone (1.8%). While 5-year overall survival was 47.3%, 947 (56.7%) patients recurred with a median RFS time of 16.3 months. First recurrence site was intrahepatic only (43.2%), extrahepatic only (35.8%), intra- and extrahepatic (21.0%). There was no difference in RFS based on site of recurrence (intrahepatic: 16.9 months; extrahepatic: 16.6 months; intra- and extrahepatic: 16.2 month; P > 0.05). Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with overall recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56), while history of RFA (HR = 2.39, P = 0.001) and R1 margin status (HR = 1.36) were predictive of intrahepatic recurrence. Pattern of recurrence and RFS remained similar following repeat surgery for recurrent disease. While 5-year survival following surgery for colorectal liver metastasis approaches 50%, over one-half of patients develop recurrence within 2 years. The pattern of failure is distributed relatively equally among intrahepatic, extrahepatic, and intra- plus extrahepatic sites. Patients undergoing repeat surgery for recurrent metastasis have similar patterns of recurrence and RFS time.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin): active first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

            Capecitabine has demonstrated high efficacy as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Oxaliplatin shows synergy with fluorouracil (FU), with little toxicity overlap. The XELOX regimen (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin), established in a previous dose-finding study, should improve on infused oxaliplatin with FU and leucovorin (FOLFOX) regimens. The present studies further characterize efficacy and safety of the XELOX regimen. The antitumor activity of XELOX was investigated in a colon cancer xenograft model. Patients with MCRC received first-line XELOX in 3-week treatment cycles: intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) (day 1) followed by oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily (day 1, evening, to day 15, morning). A preclinical study confirmed that capecitabine has supra-additive activity with oxaliplatin. In the clinical study, 53 of 96 patients (55%) achieved an objective response, and 30 (31%) experienced disease stabilization for >/= 3 months following treatment. After 24 months' minimum follow-up, median time to disease progression (TTP) and median overall survival were 7.7 and 19.5 months, respectively. XELOX safety was predictable and similar to the FOLFOX4 regimen, except that myelosuppression was uncommon with XELOX (grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 7%). Most adverse events were mild to moderate, the most common being acute sensory neuropathy (85%). Sixty-day, all-cause mortality was 2%. XELOX is a highly effective first-line treatment for MCRC. Response rates, TTP, and overall survival are similar to those observed with FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin combinations. XELOX provides a more convenient regimen, likely to be preferred by both patients and healthcare providers. Capecitabine has the potential to replace FU/LV in combination with oxaliplatin for MCRC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Gastrointest Oncol
                WJGO
                World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1948-5204
                1948-5204
                15 March 2020
                15 March 2020
                : 12
                : 3
                : 347-357
                Affiliations
                Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1081HV, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1105AZ, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1081HV, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1081HV, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1081HV, The Netherlands
                Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1081HV, The Netherlands
                Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1105AZ, The Netherlands
                Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1105AZ, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1081HV, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1105AZ, The Netherlands
                Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam Noord-Holland 1081HV, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1105AZ, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1081HV, The Netherlands. g.kazemier@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Meijer LL, Zonderhuis BM, Daams F, van Grieken NCT, Besselink MG and Kazemier G designed the research and study concept; Meijer LL, Strijker M, de Bakker JK, Toennaer JGJ, Verheij J and van Grieken NCT performed the research and data collection; Meijer LL, Strijker M, de Bakker JK, Toennaer JGJ and Kazemier G performed the statistical analysis; Meijer L, Strijker M, de Bakker JK, Zonderhuis BM, van der Vliet HJ, Wilmink H, Verheij J, Daams F, Busch OR, van Grieken NCT, Besselink MG and Kazemier G performed the data interpretation; Meijer LL, Strijker J, de Bakker JK and GK wrote the manuscript draft; Toennaer JGJ, Zonderhuis BM, van der Vliet HJ, Wilmink H, Verheij J, Daams F, Busch OR, van Grieken NCT, Besselink MG and Kazemier G reviewed and revised the manuscript; Strijker M and de Bakker JK contributed equally to this work.

                Supported by the Bennink Foundation, No. 2002262; the Cancer Center Amsterdam Foundation.

                Corresponding author: Geert Kazemier, FEBS, MD, PhD, Professor, Professor of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Director of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam 1081HV, The Netherlands. g.kazemier@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl

                Article
                jWJGO.v12.i3.pg347
                10.4251/wjgo.v12.i3.347
                7081109
                32206184
                d1c4a1b6-43af-43f2-9174-2ea972f06c9e
                ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                : 21 October 2019
                : 4 January 2020
                : 19 January 2020
                Categories
                Observational Study

                duodenal adenocarcinoma,papilla of vater adenocarcinoma,clinical outcomes,local treatment,metastases,survival

                Comments

                Comment on this article