20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Positive response to galcanezumab following treatment failure to onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with migraine: post hoc analyses of three randomized double‐blind studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and purpose

          Humanized monoclonal antibody galcanezumab, which binds to calcitonin‐gene‐related peptide, has shown efficacy for episodic and chronic migraine prevention. These analyses evaluated galcanezumab response for migraine headache prevention in patients who previously failed onabotulinumtoxinA (‘nonresponse’ or ‘inadequate response’ or safety reasons).

          Methods

          Post hoc analyses included data from three double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 episodic or chronic migraine studies; 2886 patients randomly received 120 or 240 mg galcanezumab or placebo. During double‐blind periods the study drug was administered subcutaneously once a month for 6 months in EVOLVE‐1 and ‐2 and for 3 months in REGAIN. The 120 mg groups received a 240 mg loading dose at month 1. Pooled analyses included 129 patients who failed onabotulinumtoxinA. Using mixed effect model repeat measurements, the least squares mean change from baseline in the number of migraine headache days (MHDs) was calculated for the first 3 months of treatment.

          Results

          For pooled analyses, significant decreases from baseline in the number of MHDs were observed for 120 mg (−3.91) and 240 mg (−5.27) galcanezumab overall versus placebo (−0.88) across 3‐month time points for patients who failed onabotulinumtoxinA. Corresponding data for patients with chronic migraine showed significant decreases: 120 mg (−3.18) and 240 mg (−4.26) galcanezumab versus placebo (0.16). Significant reductions in the number of MHDs per month with acute medication use included 120 mg galcanezumab (−4.35) and 240 mg galcanezumab (−4.55) versus placebo (−0.83). Estimates of ≥50% response during months 1–3 were 9.4% for placebo, 41.3% for 120 mg galcanezumab and 47.5% for 240 mg galcanezumab.

          Conclusion

          Galcanezumab is an option for prevention of migraine in patients who have previously failed onabotulinumtoxinA preventive therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Galcanezumab in chronic migraine

          Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to calcitonin gene-related peptide, in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Methods A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of LY2951742 in patients with chronic migraine (Evaluation of Galcanezumab in the Prevention of Chronic Migraine [REGAIN]) was a phase 3 study with a 3-month double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase and a 9-month open-label extension. Eligible patients 18 to 65 years of age with chronic migraine were randomized 2:1:1 to monthly subcutaneous injections of placebo (n = 558), galcanezumab 120 mg (with a 240-mg loading dose, n = 278), or galcanezumab 240 mg (n = 277). The primary endpoint was the overall mean change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days (MHDs) during the 3-month double-blind treatment phase. Results Mean number of monthly MHDs at baseline was 19.4 for the total sample. Both galcanezumab dose groups demonstrated greater overall mean reduction in the number of monthly MHDs compared to placebo (placebo −2.7, galcanezumab 120 mg −4.8, galcanezumab 240 mg −4.6) (p < 0.001 for each dose compared to placebo). There were no clinically meaningful differences between galcanezumab doses and placebo on any safety or tolerability outcome except for a higher incidence of treatment-emergent injection-site reaction (p < 0.01), injection-site erythema (p < 0.001), injection-site pruritus (p < 0.01), and sinusitis (p < 0.05) in the galcanezumab 240-mg group relative to placebo. Conclusions Both doses of galcanezumab were superior to placebo in reducing the number of monthly MHDs. Galcanezumab appears efficacious, safe, and well tolerated for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02614261. Classification of evidence This interventional study provides Class I evidence that galcanezumab is superior to placebo in the reduction of the number of monthly MHDs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: Results of the EVOLVE-2 Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Systematic Review of Migraine Prophylaxis Adherence and Persistence

              BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common neurological disease affecting 12% of Americans and millions worldwide. Medication adherence has been studied extensively in many chronic conditions, with poor adherence adversely affecting treatment outcomes. However, little is known about adherence to oral prophylaxis for migraine. OBJECTIVES: To examine the literature on assessing oral prophylaxis medication adherence and persistence among migraine patients. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed (1966 to present) and EMBASE (1974 to present) databases was conducted to locate prospective and retrospective observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of propranolol, amitriptyline, and topiramate. RCTs were pooled, weighted by sample size, and stratified by drug and length of study. Average persistence rates and reasons for discontinuation cited in RCTs were examined for each medication. RESULTS: A total of 788 unique articles were identified using the search criteria, 33 of which were included in the final review. Observational studies (n = 14) showed adherence ranges of 41% to 95% at 2 months, 21% to 80% at 6 months, and 35% to 56% at 12 months and persistence ranges of 41% to 88% at 2 months, 19% to 79% at 6 months, and 7% to 55% at 12 months. Pooled persistence from RCTs on propranolol, amitriptyline, and topiramate (n = 19) showed rates of 77%, 55%, and 57%, respectively, at 16-26 weeks. Adverse events were the most common reason for discontinuation cited (24% for topiramate and 17% for amitriptyline). CONCLUSIONS: Observational studies and pooled data from RCTs demonstrate poor adherence and persistence to oral migraine prophylaxis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sheena.aurora@lilly.com
                Journal
                Eur J Neurol
                Eur. J. Neurol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1468-1331
                ENE
                European Journal of Neurology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1351-5101
                1468-1331
                10 December 2019
                March 2020
                : 27
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/ene.v27.3 )
                : 542-549
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] MedStar Georgetown University Washington DC USA
                [ 2 ] Lilly USA, LLC Indianapolis IN USA
                [ 3 ] Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis IN USA
                [ 4 ] Nevada Headache Institute Las Vegas NV USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: S. K. Aurora, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA (tel.: 317‐276‐3220; fax: 317‐277‐2350; e‐mail: sheena.aurora@ 123456lilly.com ).

                [†]

                Former Eli Lilly employee.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9425-1710
                Article
                ENE14102
                10.1111/ene.14102
                7028018
                31595600
                d1dbb28e-9040-4ba6-b4db-ec234e2ff17b
                © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 07 May 2019
                : 14 August 2019
                : 03 September 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Pages: 8, Words: 4397
                Funding
                Funded by: Eli Lilly and Company , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100004312;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:18.02.2020

                Neurology
                calcitonin gene‐related peptide,galcanezumab,migraine,onabotulinumtoxina,treatment failure

                Comments

                Comment on this article