4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Exponential Phase of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Central Italy: An Integrated Care Pathway

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) pandemic is rapidly spreading across the world, representing an unparalleled challenge for health care systems. There are differences in the estimated fatality rates, which cannot be explained easily. In Italy, the estimated case fatality rate was 12.7% in mid-April, while Germany remained at 1.8%. Moreover, it is to be noted that different areas of Italy have very different lethality rates. Due to the complexity of Covid-19 patient management, it is of paramount importance to develop a well-defined clinical workflow in order to avoid the inconsistent management of patients. The Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) represents a multidisciplinary outline of anticipated care to support patient management in the Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome. The main objective of this pilot study was to develop a new ICP evaluated by care indicators, in order to improve the COVID-19 patient management. The suggested ICP was developed by a multi-professional team composed of different specialists and administrators already involved in clinical and management processes. After a review of current internal practices and published evidences, we identified (1) the activities performed during care delivery, (2) the responsibilities for these activities, (3) hospital structural adaptation needs and potential improvements, and (4) ICP indicators. The process map formed the basis of the final ICP document; 160 COVID-19 inpatients were considered, and the effect of the ICP implementation was evaluated over time during the exponential phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. In conclusion, a rapid adoption of ICP and regular audits of quality indicators for the management of COVID-19 patients might be important tools to improve the quality of care and outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China

          Abstract Background Since December 2019, when coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) emerged in Wuhan city and rapidly spread throughout China, data have been needed on the clinical characteristics of the affected patients. Methods We extracted data regarding 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 from 552 hospitals in 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in mainland China through January 29, 2020. The primary composite end point was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), the use of mechanical ventilation, or death. Results The median age of the patients was 47 years; 41.9% of the patients were female. The primary composite end point occurred in 67 patients (6.1%), including 5.0% who were admitted to the ICU, 2.3% who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation, and 1.4% who died. Only 1.9% of the patients had a history of direct contact with wildlife. Among nonresidents of Wuhan, 72.3% had contact with residents of Wuhan, including 31.3% who had visited the city. The most common symptoms were fever (43.8% on admission and 88.7% during hospitalization) and cough (67.8%). Diarrhea was uncommon (3.8%). The median incubation period was 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 7). On admission, ground-glass opacity was the most common radiologic finding on chest computed tomography (CT) (56.4%). No radiographic or CT abnormality was found in 157 of 877 patients (17.9%) with nonsevere disease and in 5 of 173 patients (2.9%) with severe disease. Lymphocytopenia was present in 83.2% of the patients on admission. Conclusions During the first 2 months of the current outbreak, Covid-19 spread rapidly throughout China and caused varying degrees of illness. Patients often presented without fever, and many did not have abnormal radiologic findings. (Funded by the National Health Commission of China and others.)
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

            Summary Background Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described. Methods In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death. Findings 191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients). Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03–1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61–12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64–128·55; p=0·0033) on admission. Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0–24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors. The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days. Interpretation The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage. Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future. Funding Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study

              Summary Background In December, 2019, a pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) emerged in Wuhan, China. We aimed to further clarify the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Methods In this retrospective, single-centre study, we included all confirmed cases of 2019-nCoV in Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital from Jan 1 to Jan 20, 2020. Cases were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR and were analysed for epidemiological, demographic, clinical, and radiological features and laboratory data. Outcomes were followed up until Jan 25, 2020. Findings Of the 99 patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia, 49 (49%) had a history of exposure to the Huanan seafood market. The average age of the patients was 55·5 years (SD 13·1), including 67 men and 32 women. 2019-nCoV was detected in all patients by real-time RT-PCR. 50 (51%) patients had chronic diseases. Patients had clinical manifestations of fever (82 [83%] patients), cough (81 [82%] patients), shortness of breath (31 [31%] patients), muscle ache (11 [11%] patients), confusion (nine [9%] patients), headache (eight [8%] patients), sore throat (five [5%] patients), rhinorrhoea (four [4%] patients), chest pain (two [2%] patients), diarrhoea (two [2%] patients), and nausea and vomiting (one [1%] patient). According to imaging examination, 74 (75%) patients showed bilateral pneumonia, 14 (14%) patients showed multiple mottling and ground-glass opacity, and one (1%) patient had pneumothorax. 17 (17%) patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and, among them, 11 (11%) patients worsened in a short period of time and died of multiple organ failure. Interpretation The 2019-nCoV infection was of clustering onset, is more likely to affect older males with comorbidities, and can result in severe and even fatal respiratory diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome. In general, characteristics of patients who died were in line with the MuLBSTA score, an early warning model for predicting mortality in viral pneumonia. Further investigation is needed to explore the applicability of the MuLBSTA score in predicting the risk of mortality in 2019-nCoV infection. Funding National Key R&D Program of China.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                27 May 2020
                June 2020
                : 17
                : 11
                : 3792
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Medical Oncology Unit Sant’Andrea Hospital, University La Sapienza, 00189 Rome, Italy; carlo.capalbo@ 123456uniroma1.it (C.C.); paolo.marchetti@ 123456uniroma1.it (P.M.)
                [2 ]Department of Molecular Medicine, University La Sapienza, 00189 Rome, Italy
                [3 ]Infectious Diseases Unit Sant’Andrea Hospital, University La Sapienza, 00189 Rome, Italy; antonio.aceti@ 123456uniroma1.it (A.A.); ateggi@ 123456ospedalesantandrea.it (A.T.)
                [4 ]Laboratory Analysis and Advanced Molecular Diagnostics Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; maurizio.simmaco@ 123456uniroma1.it (M.S.); marina.borro@ 123456uniroma1.it (M.B.)
                [5 ]Emergency Department Unit Sant’Andrea Hospital, University La Sapienza, 00189 Rome, Italy; rbonfini@ 123456ospedalesantandrea.it
                [6 ]Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; mrocco@ 123456ospedalesantandrea.it
                [7 ]Division of Pneumology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Sant’Andrea, 00189 Rome, Italy; alberto.ricci@ 123456uniroma1.it
                [8 ]Medical Direction Sant’Andrea Hospital, University La Sapienza, 00189 Rome, Italy; christian.napoli@ 123456uniroma1.it (C.N.); mrocco@ 123456ospedalesantandrea.it (M.R.); valfonsi@ 123456ospedalesantandrea.it (V.A.)
                [9 ]Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University La Sapienza, 00189 Rome, Italy; giovanni.orsi@ 123456uniroma1.it
                [10 ]Microbiology Unitand Advanced Molecular Diagnostics Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; iolanda.santino@ 123456uniroma1.it
                [11 ]Department of Physiology, CharitéUniversitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany; robert.preissner@ 123456charite.de
                [12 ]General Direction Sant’Andrea Hospital, University La Sapienza, 00189 Rome, Italy; amarcolongo@ 123456ospedalesantandrea.it
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: panibaldi@ 123456ospedalesantandrea.it ; Tel.: +39-063-3776-066
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to the research.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8445-6782
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1718-1587
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5775-2276
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7839-9125
                Article
                ijerph-17-03792
                10.3390/ijerph17113792
                7312393
                32471066
                d1e2330e-fedc-43ae-9695-1ffe8d78aab1
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 April 2020
                : 25 May 2020
                Categories
                Brief Report

                Public health
                coronavirus,covid-19,clinical pathway,italy,pandemic,sars-cov-2,risk management
                Public health
                coronavirus, covid-19, clinical pathway, italy, pandemic, sars-cov-2, risk management

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log