1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Letter: Perioperative and Critical Care Management of a Patient With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 Infection and Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor: As of April 20, 2020, over 2 million infections by the severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been reported and 166 256 people have died from corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). 1-4 As the surge continues, the management of neurosurgical patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 may become increasingly complex due to competing therapeutic goals. We describe the perioperative and neurocritical care management of the first reported patient with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). CASE PRESENTATION Patient Information A 56-yr-old, right-handed Caucasian female was transferred by an outside facility for definitive management of SAH (Hunt and Hess [HH] Grade II and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons [WFNS] Grade I). 5,6 The decision was made to test for SARS-CoV-2 given exposure to a concurrent outbreak of COVID-19 in the neuro-intensive care unit (neuro-ICU) at the time of admission. Diagnostic Assessment Noncontrast computed tomography (CT) head revealed aSAH with a modified Fisher grade of I. 7 CT angiography with 3-dimensional reconstructions showed a 1.6 × 1.0 cm irregularly shaped saccular right middle cerebral artery (MCA) bifurcation aneurysm with a wide neck, and with anterior and superior M2 MCA branches in a reflex angle (>180°) configuration. Chest radiograph showed subtle interstitial opacities. Nasopharyngeal swab specimens collected at the time of admission detected SARS-CoV-2. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were also tested for SARS-CoV-2 viral ribonucleic acid (RNA), which was not detected. SARS-CoV-2 Specimen Collection and Processing Initial specimens for clinical testing were obtained via deep nasopharyngeal swab and placed in 3 mL BDTM (QuadMed, Inc) universal transport media for analysis with an Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) laboratory-developed test (LDT) with reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). 8 CSF samples were obtained via a VentriClear™ I (Medtronic) antibiotic impregnated external ventricular drain catheter placed at the time of surgery. CSF sample was obtained on hospital day 6, 5 d after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and evaluated by RT-qPCR. Minimizing Exposure Prior to and after surgery, the patient was transferred to a negative-pressure room for both induction of general anesthesia and later extubation. 9 In order to limit postoperative exposure and to conserve personal protective equipment (PPE), daily rounding was limited to only 1 member of the neurosurgical team using telerounding via Zoom. 10 Intervention and Neurocritical Care Management The patient underwent craniotomy for aneurysm clipping, which required neck reconstruction with three 90° angled clips. She did not experience any perioperative complications and remained neurologically intact. Postoperative CT angiogram of the head showed appropriate clip reconstruction with no compromise of M2 MCA branches. Pulmonary edema is frequently an early or late complication of aSAH and can also be induced or exacerbated by hyperdynamic (triple-H) therapy. 11 Therefore, careful attention was placed on the fluid balance of this at-risk patient. On hospital day 5, her chest radiograph was notable for bilateral diffuse opacities. She remained asymptomatic and with oxygen saturation > 95% on ambient air. Her fluid balance status was kept slightly negative and findings improved 2 d later without any need for diuresis. Follow-up and Outcomes The patient was monitored in the neuro-ICU for a total of 6 d (postbleed day 12) and subsequently transferred to a dedicated COVID-19 acute care unit. She was discharged home on postoperative day 6 with a modified Rankin scale of 1. 12 The patient was instructed to quarantine for 14 d. She has a telemedicine appointment scheduled for postoperative follow-up. At 20 d, no one involved in her care has reported symptoms of infection with COVID-19 or has tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS This patient had favorable HH Grade and minimal blood burden on imaging on presentation, which have been associated with good outcomes. 5-7 Her aneurysm was complex and clipping was favored over an endovascular approach to avoid the use of antiplatelet therapy in the acute setting. Testing of CSF in a SARS-CoV-2-infected patient is also reported here, which to our knowledge has not been documented in the peered-reviewed literature. The limit of detection of the assay used is on a par with the most sensitive tests available, but the presence of the virus at extremely low concentrations (<25 viral copies/mL) cannot be definitively ruled out. With this case we outline measures that can be used to limit exposure and conserve PPE. This case also illustrates the need for a delicate balance in the setting of competing therapeutic goals, and that complex neurosurgical procedures may be performed safely with appropriate precautions. The present approach to the management of this patient with aSAH may provide some insight when caring for patients with urgent/emergent surgical pathologies in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Disclosures The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1

          To the Editor: A novel human coronavirus that is now named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (formerly called HCoV-19) emerged in Wuhan, China, in late 2019 and is now causing a pandemic. 1 We analyzed the aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 and compared it with SARS-CoV-1, the most closely related human coronavirus. 2 We evaluated the stability of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1 in aerosols and on various surfaces and estimated their decay rates using a Bayesian regression model (see the Methods section in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). SARS-CoV-2 nCoV-WA1-2020 (MN985325.1) and SARS-CoV-1 Tor2 (AY274119.3) were the strains used. Aerosols (<5 μm) containing SARS-CoV-2 (105.25 50% tissue-culture infectious dose [TCID50] per milliliter) or SARS-CoV-1 (106.75-7.00 TCID50 per milliliter) were generated with the use of a three-jet Collison nebulizer and fed into a Goldberg drum to create an aerosolized environment. The inoculum resulted in cycle-threshold values between 20 and 22, similar to those observed in samples obtained from the upper and lower respiratory tract in humans. Our data consisted of 10 experimental conditions involving two viruses (SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1) in five environmental conditions (aerosols, plastic, stainless steel, copper, and cardboard). All experimental measurements are reported as means across three replicates. SARS-CoV-2 remained viable in aerosols throughout the duration of our experiment (3 hours), with a reduction in infectious titer from 103.5 to 102.7 TCID50 per liter of air. This reduction was similar to that observed with SARS-CoV-1, from 104.3 to 103.5 TCID50 per milliliter (Figure 1A). SARS-CoV-2 was more stable on plastic and stainless steel than on copper and cardboard, and viable virus was detected up to 72 hours after application to these surfaces (Figure 1A), although the virus titer was greatly reduced (from 103.7 to 100.6 TCID50 per milliliter of medium after 72 hours on plastic and from 103.7 to 100.6 TCID50 per milliliter after 48 hours on stainless steel). The stability kinetics of SARS-CoV-1 were similar (from 103.4 to 100.7 TCID50 per milliliter after 72 hours on plastic and from 103.6 to 100.6 TCID50 per milliliter after 48 hours on stainless steel). On copper, no viable SARS-CoV-2 was measured after 4 hours and no viable SARS-CoV-1 was measured after 8 hours. On cardboard, no viable SARS-CoV-2 was measured after 24 hours and no viable SARS-CoV-1 was measured after 8 hours (Figure 1A). Both viruses had an exponential decay in virus titer across all experimental conditions, as indicated by a linear decrease in the log10TCID50 per liter of air or milliliter of medium over time (Figure 1B). The half-lives of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1 were similar in aerosols, with median estimates of approximately 1.1 to 1.2 hours and 95% credible intervals of 0.64 to 2.64 for SARS-CoV-2 and 0.78 to 2.43 for SARS-CoV-1 (Figure 1C, and Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix). The half-lives of the two viruses were also similar on copper. On cardboard, the half-life of SARS-CoV-2 was longer than that of SARS-CoV-1. The longest viability of both viruses was on stainless steel and plastic; the estimated median half-life of SARS-CoV-2 was approximately 5.6 hours on stainless steel and 6.8 hours on plastic (Figure 1C). Estimated differences in the half-lives of the two viruses were small except for those on cardboard (Figure 1C). Individual replicate data were noticeably “noisier” (i.e., there was more variation in the experiment, resulting in a larger standard error) for cardboard than for other surfaces (Fig. S1 through S5), so we advise caution in interpreting this result. We found that the stability of SARS-CoV-2 was similar to that of SARS-CoV-1 under the experimental circumstances tested. This indicates that differences in the epidemiologic characteristics of these viruses probably arise from other factors, including high viral loads in the upper respiratory tract and the potential for persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 to shed and transmit the virus while asymptomatic. 3,4 Our results indicate that aerosol and fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is plausible, since the virus can remain viable and infectious in aerosols for hours and on surfaces up to days (depending on the inoculum shed). These findings echo those with SARS-CoV-1, in which these forms of transmission were associated with nosocomial spread and super-spreading events, 5 and they provide information for pandemic mitigation efforts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges

            Highlights • Emergence of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China has caused a large global outbreak and major public health issue. • At 9 February 2020, data from the WHO has shown >37 000 confirmed cases in 28 countries (>99% of cases detected in China). • 2019-nCoV is spread by human-to-human transmission via droplets or direct contact. • Infection estimated to have an incubation period of 2–14 days and a basic reproduction number of 2.24–3.58. • Controlling infection to prevent spread of the 2019-nCoV is the primary intervention being used.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a Universal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neurosurgery
                Neurosurgery
                neurosurgery
                Neurosurgery
                Oxford University Press
                0148-396X
                1524-4040
                20 May 2020
                : nyaa197
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Neurosurgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama
                [2 ] Department of Pathology Division of Laboratory Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama
                Author notes

                Dagoberto Estevez-Ordonez and Nicholas M.B. Laskay contributed equally to this article.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8876-1044
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8337-4467
                Article
                nyaa197
                10.1093/neuros/nyaa197
                7313857
                32430503
                d20cc8a7-6f93-496c-88ed-f662e30cabfb
                Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

                This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 2
                Categories
                Neuros/1
                Correspondence
                AcademicSubjects/MED00930
                Custom metadata
                PAP

                Comments

                Comment on this article