9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Women's Satisfaction with Birth Center Care: A Randomized, Controlled Study

      ,
      Birth
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This randomized, controlled trial compared women's satisfaction with care at an in-hospital birth center with standard obstetric care in Stockholm. Subjects were 1230 women with an expected date of birth between October 1989 and February 1992, who expressed interest in birth center care, and who were medically low risk. The intervention was the random allocation of maternity care at the birth center or standard obstetric care. Birth center women expressed greater satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care, especially psychological aspects of care. Of these women, 63 percent thought that the antenatal care had raised their self-esteem, versus 18 percent of the control group. Eighty-nine percent of the experimental group would prefer birth center care for any future birth, and 46 percent of the control group would prefer standard care. Birth center care successfully meets the needs of women who are interested in natural childbirth and active involvement in their own care, and are concerned about the psychological aspects of birth.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mothers', midwives' and obstetricians' views on the features of obstetric care which influence satisfaction with childbirth.

          A sample of 15 women was interviewed 18-96 h postnatally to identify objective features of labour and postnatal care about which they expressed preferences. The importance of each item to a mother's satisfaction was then rated by a sample of 224 similar women. The same questionnaire was also completed by 28 midwives and 52 obstetricians. The items rated most important concerned the explanation of procedures and the involvement of mothers in administering or choosing them. Second was support from the presence of a partner and qualified hospital staff, third the physical comfort of the postnatal ward. The avoidance of obstetric interventions, such as episiotomy or use of forceps, was less important than the presence of these other features. The mean ranking given to each item by the midwives and obstetricians correlated very highly with that given by the mothers; those caring for obstetric patients are much more sensitive to their preferences than is popularly believed. There was no evidence that midwives perceived patients' needs more accurately than did the obstetricians. Discrepancies between the three groups' ranking of specific items may reflect the defence of their respective roles by each profession.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Alternative birthing center: Experience in a teaching obstetric service

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Nurse-midwifery prototypes Clinical practice and education The alternative birth center in jacksonville florida the first two years

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Birth
                Birth
                Wiley
                0730-7659
                1523-536X
                March 1993
                March 1993
                : 20
                : 1
                : 3-13
                Article
                10.1111/j.1523-536X.1993.tb00173.x
                8503964
                d20f3a93-6a93-4563-87c2-885250687994
                © 1993

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article