5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Characterising the potential for recall bias in anchor-based MCID calculation of patient-reported outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Anchor-based methods to calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) may suffer from recall bias. This has never been investigated for otolaryngic PROMs. We sought to identify evidence of recall bias in calculation of MCIDs of PROMs for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin Otolaryngol
          Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery
          Wiley
          1749-4486
          1749-4478
          September 2020
          : 45
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
          [2 ] Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
          [3 ] Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
          [4 ] Division of Otolaryngology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
          [5 ] Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA.
          Article
          10.1111/coa.13589
          32449602
          d21cf0dc-c693-4f45-9e83-d50d926ad337
          © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
          History

          MCID,anchor-based,chronic rhinosinusitis,limitations,minimal clinically important difference,recall bias

          Comments

          Comment on this article