0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of immediate post-operative pain medication on length of hospital stay: does it make a difference?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patient reported outcomes and length of hospital stay (LOS) are being used as a proxy for hospital care. An extra day of hospitalization costs thousands of health care dollars. The choice of intraoperative pain medications has been associated with decreased pain scores in other surgical subspecialties. However, the effects of immediate post-operative patient-controlled analgesics (PCA)/intravenous (IV) pain medication on patient care are not well understood in spine surgery. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of different immediate post-operative pain medications on post-operative complications profile, LOS, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) after elective spine surgery.

          Methods

          The medical records of 230 patients (morphine: n=98, fentanyl: n=61, hydromorphone: n=71) undergoing elective spine surgery at a major academic medical center were reviewed. Patients were categorized by the immediate post-operative pain medication they were on, with the most common medications being PCA/IV morphine, fentanyl, and hydromorphone. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and post-operative complication rates were collected. All patients had retrospectively collected outcomes measures and a minimum of 6-month follow up. Patient reported outcomes instruments [Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-36 and Neck/Back/Leg-Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS-NP/BP/LP)] were completed before surgery, then at 3- and 6-month after surgery.

          Results

          Baseline characteristics were similar in all cohorts. Operative variables were also similar in all cohorts, with no difference in operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), or fusion levels. Complication rates were similar between cohorts, with the fentanyl-cohort having an increased percentage of urinary tract infection (UTI) than the morphine and hydromorphone cohorts (16.39% vs. 5.15% vs. 5.63%, P=0.0277). The morphine-cohort had a decreased LOS than the fentanyl and hydromorphone cohorts (4.18 vs. 5.56 vs. 5.69 days, P=0.0376). There was a significant difference in the number of feet first ambulated by the patient post-operatively for the morphine and hydromorphone cohorts than the fentanyl-cohort (morphine: 118.44±18.15 vs. fentanyl: 59.26±20.78 vs. hydromorphone: 125.91±19.85, P=0.0420). There was no significant differences in 30-day hospital readmission rates between the cohorts, morphine-cohort did trend lower than the other cohorts (morphine: 5.10 vs. fentanyl: 11.48 vs. hydromorphone: 11.27, P=0.2492). There were no significant differences in PROs between the two cohorts in ODI, SF-36, and VAS-NP/BP/LP at baseline, 3- and 6-month.

          Conclusions

          Our study demonstrates that the choice of immediate post-operative pain medication can make a difference in the hospital course for patients. Identifying these types of factors might help increase patient care and reduce health care costs.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Spine Surg
          J Spine Surg
          JSS
          Journal of Spine Surgery
          AME Publishing Company
          2414-469X
          2414-4630
          June 2017
          June 2017
          : 3
          : 2
          : 155-162
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina, USA;
          [2 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, Illinois, USA;
          [3 ]Department of Neurosurgery, the University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, Illinois, USA;
          [4 ]Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky , Lexington, Kentucky, USA;
          [5 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University , New Haven, Connecticut, USA;
          [6 ]Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas South Western , Dallas, Texas, USA
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: Owoicho Adogwa, MD, MPH. Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison, Suite 855, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Email: owoicho.adogwa@ 123456gmail.com .

          Contributions: (I) Conception and design: O Adogwa, AA Elsamadicy; (II) Administrative support: IO Karikari, CA Bagley, J Cheng, RA Vasquez, AI Mehta; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: IO Karikari, CA Bagley; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: O Adogwa, AA Elsamadicy, J Fialkoff, VD Vuong; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: O Adogwa, AA Elsamadicy; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

          Article
          PMC5506320 PMC5506320 5506320 jss-03-02-155
          10.21037/jss.2017.04.04
          5506320
          28744495
          d239ce83-19fd-4fbc-b508-d7e6c7bf664b
          2017 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
          History
          : 06 October 2016
          : 22 March 2017
          Categories
          Original Study

          30-day readmission,Spine surgery,narcotics,length of hospital stay (LOS),patient reported outcomes (PROs)

          Comments

          Comment on this article