13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using a Mobile Device “App” and Proximal Remote Sensing Technologies to Assess Soil Cover Fractions on Agricultural Fields

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Quantifying the amount of crop residue left in the field after harvest is a key issue for sustainability. Conventional assessment approaches (e.g., line-transect) are labor intensive, time-consuming and costly. Many proximal remote sensing devices and systems have been developed for agricultural applications such as cover crop and residue mapping. For instance, current mobile devices (smartphones & tablets) are usually equipped with digital cameras and global positioning systems and use applications (apps) for in-field data collection and analysis. In this study, we assess the feasibility and strength of a mobile device app developed to estimate crop residue cover. The performance of this novel technique (from here on referred to as “app” method) was compared against two point counting approaches: an established digital photograph-grid method and a new automated residue counting script developed in MATLAB at the University of Guelph. Both photograph-grid and script methods were used to count residue under 100 grid points. Residue percent cover was estimated using the app, script and photograph-grid methods on 54 vertical digital photographs (images of the ground taken from above at a height of 1.5 m) collected from eighteen fields (9 corn and 9 soybean, 3 samples each) located in southern Ontario. Results showed that residue estimates from the app method were in good agreement with those obtained from both photograph–grid and script methods (R 2 = 0.86 and 0.84, respectively). This study has found that the app underestimates the residue coverage by −6.3% and −10.8% when compared to the photograph-grid and script methods, respectively. With regards to residue type, soybean has a slightly lower bias than corn (i.e., −5.3% vs. −7.4%). For photos with residue <30%, the app derived residue measurements are within ±5% difference (bias) of both photograph-grid- and script-derived residue measurements. These methods could therefore be used to track the recommended minimum soil residue cover of 30%, implemented to reduce farmland topsoil and nutrient losses that impact water quality. Overall, the app method was found to be a good alternative to the point counting methods, which are more time-consuming.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Beta Regression for Modelling Rates and Proportions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Canopeo: A Powerful New Tool for Measuring Fractional Green Canopy Cover

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Sequestering carbon and increasing productivity by conservation agriculture

              R. Lal (2015)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                sensors
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                MDPI
                1424-8220
                27 February 2018
                March 2018
                : 18
                : 3
                : 708
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Geography-Hutt Building, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada; rpardo@ 123456uoguelph.ca (R.P.L.); aberg@ 123456uoguelph.ca (A.A.B.)
                [2 ]Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC)-Science and Technology Branch, 174 Stone Road West, Guelph, ON N1G 4S9, Canada; pamela.joosse@ 123456agr.gc.ca
                [3 ]FieldTRAKS Solutions Inc., 6367 McCordick Road, North Gower, Ottawa, ON K0A 2T0, Canada; d.branson@ 123456fieldtraks.ca
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: alaamran@ 123456uoguelph.ca ; Tel.: +1-519-824-4120 (ext. 58950)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-1583
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8438-5662
                Article
                sensors-18-00708
                10.3390/s18030708
                5876868
                29495497
                d2449cce-5e98-424e-81bb-81a0051741d4
                © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 15 January 2018
                : 21 February 2018
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                agricultural land,field crops,land cover,photograph-grid method,remote sensing,data validation and calibration,mobile app

                Comments

                Comment on this article