43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Entwicklung und Validierung von Instrumenten zur Überprüfung der therapeutischen Adhärenz und Kompetenz bei der Behandlung der Panikstörung

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Zusammenfassung. Theoretischer Hintergrund: Die Güte der Expositionsvorbereitung wird als wichtiger Faktor für die erfolgreiche Behandlung der Panikstörung mit Agoraphobie gesehen. Jedoch fehlt es an geeigneten Instrumenten, um dies zu untersuchen. Fragestellung: Ziel der Studie ist die Konstruktion und Validierung von Skalen zur Erfassung der Adhärenz und Kompetenz bei der Vorbereitung der Exposition. Methode: Vier Experten wurden zur Inhaltsvalidierung herangezogen. Die weitere Überprüfung der Reliabilität und Validität erfolgte auf der Basis von 84 psychotherapeutischen Behandlungen von Patienten mit Panikstörung und Agoraphobie. Ergebnisse: Die Adhärenz- und Kompetenzskala wiesen eine hohe Interratereliabilität auf und es zeigten sich deutliche Hinweise für deren Validität. Schlussfolgerungen: Die entwickelten Verfahren können sowohl in der klinischen Forschung, als auch in der Aus- und Weiterbildung von Therapeuten sinnvoll eingesetzt werden.

          Development and Validation of Instruments for the Evaluation of Therapeutic Adherence and Competence in the Treatment of Panic Disorders

          Abstract. Background: The quality of preparing exposure interventions can be considered an important factor for the successful treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia. However, appropriate instruments are missing to investigate this. Objective: The study’s aim is the construction and validation of scales to evaluate the therapeutic adherence and competence of preparing exposure interventions. Method: Four experts were used for content validation. The further verification of reliability and validity was made on the basis of 84 psychotherapeutic treatments of patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia. Results: The interrater agreement for the adherence and competence scale was high and there were clear indications for their validity. Conclusion: The developed instruments can be used meaningfully in clinical research as well as for therapist training.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Psychological treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: a meta-analysis.

          Although the efficacy of psychological treatment for panic disorder (PD) with or without agoraphobia has been the subject of a great deal of research, the specific contribution of techniques such as exposure, cognitive therapy, relaxation training and breathing retraining has not yet been clearly established. This paper presents a meta-analysis applying random- and mixed-effects models to a total of 65 comparisons between a treated and a control group, obtained from 42 studies published between 1980 and 2006. The results showed that, after controlling for the methodological quality of the studies and the type of control group, the combination of exposure, relaxation training, and breathing retraining gives the most consistent evidence for treating PD. Other factors that improve the effectiveness of treatments are the inclusion of homework during the intervention and a follow-up program after it has finished. Furthermore, the treatment is more effective when the patients have no comorbid disorders and the shorter the time they have been suffering from the illness. Publication bias and several methodological factors were discarded as a threat against the validity of our results. Finally the implications of the results for clinical practice and for future research are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Therapists, therapist variables, and cognitive-behavioral therapy outcome in a multicenter trial for panic disorder.

            The relationship between therapists and treatment outcome was examined in 14 highly trained therapists who participated in the Multicenter Collaborative Study for the Treatment of Panic Disorder. Overall, therapists yielded positive outcomes in their caseloads; yet, therapists significantly differed in the magnitude of change among caseloads. Effect sizes for therapist impact on outcome measures varied from 0% to 18%. Overall experience in conducting psychotherapy was related to outcome on some measures, whereas age, gender, gender match, and experience with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) were not. Therapists with above- and below-average outcomes were rated similarly on measures of adherence and competency. The results suggest that therapists make a contribution to outcome in CBT for panic disorder, even when patients are relatively uniform, treatment is structured, and outcome is positive. Implications for future clinical outcome studies and for training clinicians are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A systematic review of methods for assessing competence in cognitive-behavioural therapy.

              Effective assessment of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) competence is crucial to the success of the current drive to expand CBT training and service provision, and to the widespread dissemination of CBT into routine practice. However, a lack of consensus about how CBT competence should be assessed has resulted in the use of numerous different methods, many of which have been widely criticised. This review describes and evaluates the various methods of assessing CBT competence. A systematic literature search identified 64 articles pertaining to a method of assessing competence in the provision of standard CBT interventions to adults experiencing mental health problems. Ten methods for assessing CBT therapist competence were identified from these articles and are presented within Miller's (Miller, G. E. [1990]. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine, 65, 63-67) framework for assessing clinical skill. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are examined in relation to reliability, validity and feasibility. The limitations of the current evidence base are outlined and priorities for future research are highlighted. Tentative recommendations for assessing therapist competence are made within the context of the limited evidence base and need for feasibility in clinical practice settings. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                zkp
                Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
                Hogrefe Verlag, Göttingen
                1616-3443
                2190-6297
                2015
                : 44
                : 2
                : 88-96
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Abteilung Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
                [ 2 ]Christoph-Dornier-Stiftung für Klinische Psychologie, Institut Bremen
                [ 3 ]Abteilung Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität Hamburg
                [ 4 ]Abteilung Klinische Psychologie, Psychotherapie und Experimentelle Psychopathologie, Universität Mainz
                Author notes
                Dipl.-Psych. Florian Grikscheit, Abteilung Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Varrentrappstr. 40 – 42, 60486 Frankfurt, E-Mail grikscheit@ 123456psych.uni-frankfurt.de
                Article
                zkp_44_2_88
                10.1026/1616-3443/a000309
                d2de05f3-f473-4660-a057-87e263624a77
                Copyright @ 2015
                History
                Categories
                Originalia

                Psychology,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                factor structure,Adhärenz,psychotherapeutische Kompetenz,Inhaltsvalidität,Beurteilerübereinstimmung,Faktorenstruktur,adherence,therapeutic competence,content validity,interrater agreement

                Comments

                Comment on this article