7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Global Consensus From Clinicians Regarding Low Back Pain Outcome Indicators for Older Adults: Pairwise Wiki Survey Using Crowdsourcing

      research-article
      , PT, MPhil, PhD 1 , , , DC, MSc, PhD 2 , , MSc, DSc 3 , , PT, MSc, PhD 4 , , PT, MSc, PhD 5 , , PT, MSc, PhD 6
      (Reviewer)
      JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
      JMIR Publications
      crowdsourcing, wiki survey, low back pain, older people, outcome indicators

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most debilitating conditions among older adults. Unfortunately, existing LBP outcome questionnaires are not adapted for specific circumstances related to old age, which may make these measures less than ideal for evaluating LBP in older adults.

          Objective

          To explore the necessity of developing age-specific outcome measures, crowdsourcing was conducted to solicit opinions from clinicians globally.

          Methods

          Clinicians around the world voted and/or prioritized various LBP outcome indicators for older adults on a pairwise wiki survey website. Seven seed outcome indicators were posted for voting while respondents were encouraged to suggest new indicators for others to vote/prioritize. The website was promoted on the social media of various health care professional organizations. An established algorithm calculated the mean scores of all ideas. A score >50 points means that the idea has >50% probability of beating another randomly presented indicator.

          Results

          Within 42 days, 128 respondents from 6 continents cast 2466 votes and proposed 14 ideas. Indicators pertinent to improvements of physical functioning and age-related social functioning scored >50 while self-perceived reduction of LBP scored 32.

          Conclusions

          This is the first crowdsourcing study to address LBP outcome indicators for older adults. The study noted that age-specific outcome indicators should be integrated into future LBP outcome measures for older adults. Future research should solicit opinions from older patients with LBP to develop age-specific back pain outcome measures that suit clinicians and patients alike.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Use of Confidence or Fiducial Limits Illustrated in the Case of the Binomial

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain.

            Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) hinders comparison of findings and the reliability of systematic reviews. A core outcome set (COS) can address this issue as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all clinical trials. In 1998, Deyo et al. recommended a standardized set of outcomes for LBP clinical research. The aim of this study was to update these recommendations by determining which outcome domains should be included in a COS for clinical trials in NSLBP.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Communication and psychosocial consequences of sensory loss in older adults: overview and rehabilitation directions.

              With increasing longevity among populations, age-related vision and hearing impairments are becoming prevalent conditions in the older adult populations. In combination dual sensory loss occurs. Dual sensory loss is becoming a more common condition seen by clinicians and previous research has shown that 6% of non-institutionalized older adults had a dual sensory impairment, whilst 70% of severely vision-impaired older adults also demonstrated a significant hearing loss. Decreased vision and/or hearing acuity interferes with reception of the spoken message and hence people with sensory loss frequently experience communication breakdown. Many personal, situational and environmental triggers are also responsible for communication breakdown. Limited ability to improve communication performance frequently results in poor psychosocial functioning. Older adults with sensory loss often experience difficulty adjusting to their sensory loss. Depression, anxiety, lethargy and social dissatisfaction are often reported. Sensory loss, decreased communication performance and psychosocial functioning impacts on one's quality of life and feelings of well-being. Rehabilitation services for older adults with age-related sensory loss need to accommodate these difficulties. Improved staff education and rehabilitation programmes providing clients and carers with strategies to overcome communication breakdown is required. A multidisciplinary perspective to the assessment and remediation of older adults is recommended.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
                JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
                JRAT
                JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2369-2529
                Jan-Jun 2019
                15 January 2019
                : 6
                : 1
                : e11127
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Rehabilitation Sciences Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong China (Hong Kong)
                [2 ] Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark
                [3 ] Rush University Medical Center Chicago, IL United States
                [4 ] Population Health Research Institute Hamilton, ON Canada
                [5 ] Department of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney Sydney Australia
                [6 ] Institute of Bone and Joint Research University of Sydney Sydney Australia
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Arnold YL Wong arnold.wong@ 123456polyu.edu.hk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5911-5756
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5198-5215
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9188-2931
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1840-2951
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5861-7770
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8452-2222
                Article
                v6i1e11127
                10.2196/11127
                6350088
                30664493
                d301a418-05e2-4d74-b022-be3768c33172
                ©Arnold YL Wong, Henrik H Lauridsen, Dino Samartzis, Luciana Macedo, Paulo H Ferreira, Manuela L Ferreira. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 15.01.2019.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://rehab.jmir.org/.as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 31 May 2018
                : 9 October 2018
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                crowdsourcing,wiki survey,low back pain,older people,outcome indicators

                Comments

                Comment on this article