Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

Pharmacokinetics of anthraquinones in Xiexin decoction and in different combinations of its constituent herbs.

Phytotherapy Research

Scutellaria baicalensis, chemistry, blood, pharmacokinetics, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Anthraquinones, Coptis, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, administration & dosage, Plant Extracts, Plant Preparations, Random Allocation, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Reproducibility of Results, Rheum, Administration, Oral, Animals

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Xiexin decoction (XXD), a classic pyretolysis formula, is composed of Rhei Rhizoma (DH), Radix Scutellaria (HQ) and Coptis Chinensis (HL) and is commonly used in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic differences of the five anthraquinones in rats after oral administration of XXD and different combinations of its constituent herbs. Twenty rats were randomly divided into four groups and were administered one of the four extracts: DH, DH-HQ, DH-HL and XXD (DH-HQ-HL) via intragastric gavage. Anthraquinone concentrations in plasma were determined by an HPLC technique. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the plasma concentration-time data. Compared with DH alone, the DH-HL combination decreased C(max) of all five anthraquinones and AUC of four anthraquinones (except physcion), and the DH-HQ combination decreased AUC of aloe-emodin and C(max) of rhein. Finally, XXD increased AUC of all five anthraquinones compared with DH-HL combination. These results showed that the oral bioavailabilities of five anthraquinones were decreased significantly by combining DH with HL, whereas HQ weakened the effect of HL that inhibited the absorption of anthraquinones. (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      10.1002/ptr.2622
      18844291

      Comments

      Comment on this article