12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Detect Melanoma in Images of Skin Lesions

      research-article
      , MMedSci 1 , 2 , , , PhD 3 , , , MB, ChB, FRCS 4 , , PhD, MBBS, MRCP 5 , , MA, BMBCh, MRCP 5 , , PhD 3 , , BMBS, MRCP 6 , , BSc, RGN 6 , , PGCME, DTM&H, FRCP 7 , , MB ChB, FRCP 8 , 9 , , MD, PhD 10 , , MD, PhD 11
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          How accurate is an artificial intelligence–based melanoma detection algorithm, which analyzes dermoscopic images taken by smartphone and digital single-lens reflex cameras, compared with clinical assessment and histopathological diagnosis?

          Findings

          In this diagnostic study, 1550 images of suspicious and benign skin lesions were analyzed by an artificial intelligence algorithm. When compared with histopathological diagnosis, the algorithm achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 91.8%. At 100% sensitivity, the algorithm achieved a specificity of 64.8%, while clinicians achieved a specificity of 69.9%.

          Meaning

          As the burden of skin cancer increases, artificial intelligence technology could play a role in identifying lesions with a high likelihood of melanoma.

          Abstract

          This diagnostic study determines the accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm in identifying melanoma in dermoscopic images of lesions taken with smartphone and digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) cameras.

          Abstract

          Importance

          A high proportion of suspicious pigmented skin lesions referred for investigation are benign. Techniques to improve the accuracy of melanoma diagnoses throughout the patient pathway are needed to reduce the pressure on secondary care and pathology services.

          Objective

          To determine the accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm in identifying melanoma in dermoscopic images of lesions taken with smartphone and digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) cameras.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This prospective, multicenter, single-arm, masked diagnostic trial took place in dermatology and plastic surgery clinics in 7 UK hospitals. Dermoscopic images of suspicious and control skin lesions from 514 patients with at least 1 suspicious pigmented skin lesion scheduled for biopsy were captured on 3 different cameras. Data were collected from January 2017 to July 2018. Clinicians and the Deep Ensemble for Recognition of Malignancy, a deterministic artificial intelligence algorithm trained to identify melanoma in dermoscopic images of pigmented skin lesions using deep learning techniques, assessed the likelihood of melanoma. Initial data analysis was conducted in September 2018; further analysis was conducted from February 2019 to August 2019.

          Interventions

          Clinician and algorithmic assessment of melanoma.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity of the algorithmic and specialist assessment, determined using histopathology diagnosis as the criterion standard.

          Results

          The study population of 514 patients included 279 women (55.7%) and 484 white patients (96.8%), with a mean (SD) age of 52.1 (18.6) years. A total of 1550 images of skin lesions were included in the analysis (551 [35.6%] biopsied lesions; 999 [64.4%] control lesions); 286 images (18.6%) were used to train the algorithm, and a further 849 (54.8%) images were missing or unsuitable for analysis. Of the biopsied lesions that were assessed by the algorithm and specialists, 125 (22.7%) were diagnosed as melanoma. Of these, 77 (16.7%) were used for the primary analysis. The algorithm achieved an AUROC of 90.1% (95% CI, 86.3%-94.0%) for biopsied lesions and 95.8% (95% CI, 94.1%-97.6%) for all lesions using iPhone 6s images; an AUROC of 85.8% (95% CI, 81.0%-90.7%) for biopsied lesions and 93.8% (95% CI, 91.4%-96.2%) for all lesions using Galaxy S6 images; and an AUROC of 86.9% (95% CI, 80.8%-93.0%) for biopsied lesions and 91.8% (95% CI, 87.5%-96.1%) for all lesions using DSLR camera images. At 100% sensitivity, the algorithm achieved a specificity of 64.8% with iPhone 6s images. Specialists achieved an AUROC of 77.8% (95% CI, 72.5%-81.9%) and a specificity of 69.9%.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this study, the algorithm demonstrated an ability to identify melanoma from dermoscopic images of selected lesions with an accuracy similar to that of specialists.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks

          Skin cancer, the most common human malignancy, is primarily diagnosed visually, beginning with an initial clinical screening and followed potentially by dermoscopic analysis, a biopsy and histopathological examination. Automated classification of skin lesions using images is a challenging task owing to the fine-grained variability in the appearance of skin lesions. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) show potential for general and highly variable tasks across many fine-grained object categories. Here we demonstrate classification of skin lesions using a single CNN, trained end-to-end from images directly, using only pixels and disease labels as inputs. We train a CNN using a dataset of 129,450 clinical images—two orders of magnitude larger than previous datasets—consisting of 2,032 different diseases. We test its performance against 21 board-certified dermatologists on biopsy-proven clinical images with two critical binary classification use cases: keratinocyte carcinomas versus benign seborrheic keratoses; and malignant melanomas versus benign nevi. The first case represents the identification of the most common cancers, the second represents the identification of the deadliest skin cancer. The CNN achieves performance on par with all tested experts across both tasks, demonstrating an artificial intelligence capable of classifying skin cancer with a level of competence comparable to dermatologists. Outfitted with deep neural networks, mobile devices can potentially extend the reach of dermatologists outside of the clinic. It is projected that 6.3 billion smartphone subscriptions will exist by the year 2021 (ref. 13) and can therefore potentially provide low-cost universal access to vital diagnostic care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                16 October 2019
                October 2019
                16 October 2019
                : 2
                : 10
                : e1913436
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
                [2 ]Centre for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
                [3 ]Skin Analytics Limited, London, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospital North Midlands, Stoke, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [6 ]Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
                [7 ]Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Corbett Hospital, Stourbridge, United Kingdom
                [8 ]Barts Health, London, United Kingdom
                [9 ]Queen Mary School of Medicine, University of London, London, United Kingdom
                [10 ]Dermatology Unit, University of Campania, Naples, Italy
                [11 ]Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: August 27, 2019.
                Published: October 16, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13436
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. © 2019 Phillips M et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Michael Phillips, MMedSci, Centre for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6008, Australia ( michael.phillips@ 123456perkins.uwa.edu.au ); Helen Marsden, PhD, Skin Analytics Limited, One Phipp Street, The Frames, London EC2A 4PS, United Kingdom ( helen@ 123456skinanalytics.co.uk ).
                Author Contributions: Mr Phillips had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Phillips, Marsden, Greenhalgh, Argenziano, Palamaras.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Phillips, Marsden, Jaffe, Matin, Wali, Greenhalgh, McGrath, James, Ladoyanni, Bewley, Palamaras.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Phillips, Marsden, Greenhalgh, McGrath, Palamaras.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Jaffe, Matin, Wali, Greenhalgh, McGrath, James, Ladoyanni, Bewley, Argenziano, Palamaras.
                Statistical analysis: Phillips, Greenhalgh.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Marsden, Jaffe, McGrath, James, Bewley, Palamaras.
                Supervision: Phillips, Jaffe, Wali, Ladoyanni, Palamaras.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Mr Phillips reported having a familial relationship with Skin Analytics Limited. Dr Marsden reported working for Skin Analytics Limited and receiving share options during the conduct of the study. Dr Matin reported receiving grants from Barco outside the submitted work and being coauthor of a suite of Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews, including the diagnosis of melanoma. Dr Greenhalgh reported working for Skin Analytics Limited during the conduct of the study and holding patent US 20150254851 A1. Dr Bewley reported working as an ad hoc consultant for Almirall, AbbVie, Galderma, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly and Co, Sanofi, Novartis, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was funded by Skin Analytics Limited, which developed and owns Deep Ensemble for Recognition of Malignancy. The Royal Perth Hospital Medical Research Fund supported the analysis and interpretation of the data and the preparation of the manuscript.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: Employees of Skin Analytics Limited designed and conducted the study; collected, managed, and analyzed the images; contributed to the interpretation of the data; and prepared, reviewed, and approved the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Royal Perth Hospital Medical Research Fund had no involvement with the data analysis and interpretation of the data, nor the preparation of the manuscript.
                Additional Contributions: We thank all the patients who kindly consented to participate in the study.
                Article
                zoi190513
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13436
                6806667
                31617929
                d3459a32-9963-437b-a182-50cfb4f15338
                Copyright 2019 Phillips M et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.

                History
                : 4 June 2019
                : 27 August 2019
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Dermatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article