129
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The hyperexcitability of dentate granule neurons in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures is due to reorganization of synaptic inputs in vitro

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Organotypic hippocampal slice cultures ( OHSCs) provide the experimental flexibility of cell culture while leaving much of the natural neuronal connectivity intact. Previously, it was shown that the functional and morphological features of CA1 pyramidal neurons in OHSCs resemble, to a surprising extent, those of CA1 neurons in the acute brain slice preparation. However, the extent to which the characteristics of other principle hippocampal neurons change or are preserved in cultured slices remains to be determined. In the present study, I initially sought to understand whether and how the synaptic inputs and morphology of cultured dentate granule neurons ( GCs) differ from GCs that have developed in vivo. To this end, I compared GCs in OHSCs and GCs in acute slices at two equivalent developmental time points (P14 vs. DIV7 and P21 vs. DIV21). The findings suggest that there is considerable reorganization of synaptic input to the organotypic GCs, such that these cells are more susceptible to hyperexcitation than GCs in acute slices after 3 weeks. It appears that this hyperexcitability emerges through an increase in the proportion of mature synapses at proximal dendritic sites and is accompanied by an increase in inhibitory neuron activity. These alterations appear to arise in a coordinated manner such that the substantial increase in excitatory synaptic drive received by the DIV21 GCs in OHSCs remains local and is not translated into excessive output possibly leading to damage or major morphological alterations of downstream pyramidal neurons.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A simple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue.

          Hippocampal slices prepared from 2-23-day-old neonates were maintained in culture at the interface between air and a culture medium. They were placed on a sterile, transparent and porous membrane and kept in petri dishes in an incubator. No plasma clot or roller drum were used. This method yields thin slices which remain 1-4 cell layers thick and are characterized by a well preserved organotypic organization. Pyramidal neurons labelled by extra- and intracellular application of horse radish peroxidase resemble by the organization and complexity of their dendritic processes those observed in situ at a comparable developmental stage. Excitatory and inhibitory synaptic potentials can easily be analysed using extra- or intracellular recording techniques. After a few days in culture, long-term potentiation of synaptic responses can reproducibly be induced. Evidence for a sprouting response during the first days in culture or following sections is illustrated. This technique may represent an interesting alternative to roller tube cultures for studies of the developmental changes occurring during the first days or weeks in culture.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Synaptic plasticity, memory and the hippocampus: a neural network approach to causality.

            Two facts about the hippocampus have been common currency among neuroscientists for several decades. First, lesions of the hippocampus in humans prevent the acquisition of new episodic memories; second, activity-dependent synaptic plasticity is a prominent feature of hippocampal synapses. Given this background, the hypothesis that hippocampus-dependent memory is mediated, at least in part, by hippocampal synaptic plasticity has seemed as cogent in theory as it has been difficult to prove in practice. Here we argue that the recent development of transgenic molecular devices will encourage a shift from mechanistic investigations of synaptic plasticity in single neurons towards an analysis of how networks of neurons encode and represent memory, and we suggest ways in which this might be achieved. In the process, the hypothesis that synaptic plasticity is necessary and sufficient for information storage in the brain may finally be validated.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Unraveling mechanisms of homeostatic synaptic plasticity.

              Homeostatic synaptic plasticity is a negative feedback mechanism that neurons use to offset excessive excitation or inhibition by adjusting their synaptic strengths. Recent findings reveal a complex web of signaling processes involved in this compensatory form of synaptic strength regulation, and in contrast to the popular view of homeostatic plasticity as a slow, global phenomenon, neurons may also rapidly tune the efficacy of individual synapses on demand. Here we review our current understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms of homeostatic synaptic plasticity. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                c.j.gilbride@eni-g.de
                Journal
                Physiol Rep
                Physiol Rep
                10.1002/(ISSN)2051-817X
                PHY2
                physreports
                Physiological Reports
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2051-817X
                05 October 2016
                October 2016
                : 4
                : 19 ( doiID: 10.1111/phy2.2016.4.issue-19 )
                : e12889
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Depatment of Neuroscience, Physiology and PharmacologyUniversity College London LondonUK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Charlie J Gilbride, Depatment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

                Tel: +49 551 39 13894

                Fax: +49 551 39 20150

                E‐mail: c.j.gilbride@ 123456eni-g.de

                Article
                PHY212889
                10.14814/phy2.12889
                5064129
                27707779
                d35390cd-211b-4536-a7c1-276b1fa0865c
                © 2016 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 March 2016
                : 15 July 2016
                : 15 July 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Pages: 10, Words: 5896
                Funding
                Funded by: University College London
                Categories
                Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
                Central Nervous System
                Neuronal Plasticity and Repair
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                phy212889
                October 2016
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:4.9.4 mode:remove_FC converted:14.10.2016

                confocal microscopy,electrophysiology,organotypic slice culture,synaptic plasticity

                Comments

                Comment on this article