16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prediction of optimal atrioventricular delay in patients with implanted DDD pacemakers.

      Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
      Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrioventricular Node, physiopathology, Cardiac Output, Catheterization, Swan-Ganz, Echocardiography, Doppler, Pulsed, Electrophysiology, Female, Heart Block, therapy, ultrasonography, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mitral Valve, Pacemaker, Artificial, Pulmonary Wedge Pressure

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In patients with an implanted DDD pacemaker (PM), the atrial contribution may be interrupted by too short an atrioventricular (AV) delay, and filling time may be shortened by too long an AV delay. The AV delay at which the end of the A wave on transmitral flow coincides with complete closure of the mitral valve may be optimal. The subjects were 15 patients [70.3+/-12.3 (SD) years old] with an implanted DDD PM. Cardiac output (CO) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) were measured by Swan-Ganz catheter. Transmitral flow was recorded by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. AV delay was prolonged stepwise by 25 msc. When the AV delay was set at 155+/-26 ms, the end of the A wave coincided with complete closure of the mitral valve. When the AV delay was prolonged 25, 50, 75, and 100 ms from this AV delay, the interval between the end of the A wave and complete closure of mitral the valve was prolonged 16+/-5, 39+/-6, 65+/-4 and 88+/-5 ms, respectively (r = 0.97, P<0.0001) and diastolic mitral regurgitation was observed during this period. Thus, the optimal AV delay may be predicted as follows: the slightly prolonged AV delay minus the interval between the end of the A wave and complete closure of the mitral valve. When the AV delay was set at 215 ms, there was a significant positive correlation between the predicted optimal AV delay (166+/-23 ms) and the optimal AV delay (CO: 161+/-26 msec, r = 0.93, P<0.0001, PCWP: 161+/-28 msec, r = 0.95, P<0.0001). In conclusion, optimal AV delay can be predicted by this simple formula: slightly prolonged AV delay minus the interval between end of A wave and complete closure of mitral valve at the AV delay setting.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article