3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dynamic c-Fos changes in mouse brain during acute and protracted withdrawal from chronic intermittent ethanol exposure and relapse drinking

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Alcohol dependence promotes neuroadaptations in numerous brain areas, leading to escalated drinking and enhanced relapse vulnerability. We previously developed a mouse model of ethanol dependence and relapse drinking in which repeated cycles of chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) vapor exposure drive a significant escalation of voluntary ethanol drinking. In the current study, we used this model to evaluate changes in neuronal activity (as indexed by c-Fos expression) throughout acute and protracted withdrawal from CIE (combined with or without a history of ethanol drinking). We analyzed c-Fos protein expression in 29 brain regions in mice sacrificed 2, 10, 26, and 74 hours or 7 days after withdrawal from 5 cycles of CIE. Results revealed dynamic time- and brain region-dependent changes in c-Fos activity over the time course of withdrawal from CIE exposure, as compared with nondependent air-exposed control mice, beginning with markedly low expression levels upon removal from the ethanol vapor chambers (2 hours), reflecting intoxication. c-Fos expression was enhanced during acute CIE withdrawal (10 and 26 hours), followed by widespread reductions at the beginning of protracted withdrawal (74 hours) in several brain areas. Persistent reductions in c-Fos expression were observed during prolonged withdrawal (7 days) in prelimbic cortex, nucleus accumbens shell, dorsomedial striatum, paraventricular nucleus of thalamus, and ventral subiculum. A history of ethanol drinking altered acute CIE withdrawal effects and caused widespread reductions in c-Fos that persisted during extended abstinence even without CIE exposure. These data indicate that ethanol dependence and relapse drinking drive long-lasting neuroadaptations in several brain regions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications.

            The loss of control over drug intake that occurs in addiction was initially believed to result from disruption of subcortical reward circuits. However, imaging studies in addictive behaviours have identified a key involvement of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) both through its regulation of limbic reward regions and its involvement in higher-order executive function (for example, self-control, salience attribution and awareness). This Review focuses on functional neuroimaging studies conducted in the past decade that have expanded our understanding of the involvement of the PFC in drug addiction. Disruption of the PFC in addiction underlies not only compulsive drug taking but also accounts for the disadvantageous behaviours that are associated with addiction and the erosion of free will.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research.

              The screening of many endpoints when comparing groups from different strains, searching for some statistically significant difference, raises the multiple comparisons problem in its most severe form. Using the 0.05 level to decide which of the many endpoints' differences are statistically significant, the probability of finding a difference to be significant even though it is not real increases far beyond 0.05. The traditional approach to this problem has been to control the probability of making even one such error--the Bonferroni procedure being the most familiar procedure achieving such control. However, the incurred loss of power stemming from such control led many practitioners to neglect multiplicity control altogether. The False Discovery Rate (FDR), suggested by Benjamini and Hochberg [J Royal Stat Soc Ser B 57 (1995) 289], is a new, different, and compromising point of view regarding the error in multiple comparisons. The FDR is the expected proportion of false discoveries among the discoveries, and controlling the FDR goes a long way towards controlling the increased error from multiplicity while losing less in the ability to discover real differences. In this paper we demonstrate the problem in two studies: the study of exploratory behavior [Behav Brain Res (2001)], and the study of the interaction of strain differences with laboratory environment [Science 284 (1999) 1670]. We explain the FDR criterion, and present two simple procedures that control the FDR. We demonstrate their increased power when used in the above two studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9604935
                22377
                Addict Biol
                Addict Biol
                Addiction biology
                1355-6215
                1369-1600
                16 October 2020
                09 July 2019
                November 2020
                03 November 2020
                : 25
                : 6
                : e12804
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
                [3 ]Charleston Alcohol Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
                [4 ]Ralph H. Johnson Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
                Author notes

                Present Address

                Rachel J. Smith, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Institute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

                AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

                RJS, RIA, HLH, PJM, WCG, MFL, and HCB were responsible for study conception and design. RJS, RIA, and HLH acquired animal and image data. RJS, RIA, and WCG drafted the manuscript. All authors provided critical revision of the manuscript and approved the final version for publication.

                Correspondence Howard C. Becker, Professor of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Director, Charleston Alcohol Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Senior Research Career Scientist, VAMC, 67 President Street; IOP 453N, Charleston, SC 29425, USA., beckerh@ 123456musc.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5212-561X
                Article
                NIHMS1637378
                10.1111/adb.12804
                7579841
                31288295
                d37ebc4e-0d36-4810-a66e-479c6698b8de

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Health & Social care
                alcohol,amygdala,bed nucleus of stria terminalis,cortex,dependence,stress
                Health & Social care
                alcohol, amygdala, bed nucleus of stria terminalis, cortex, dependence, stress

                Comments

                Comment on this article