0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Effect of Unilateral Orchidectomy on Plasma FSH Concentration: Evidence for a Direct Neural Connection between Testes and CNS

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The effect of unilateral orchidectomy on plasma FSH, LH and LHRH content in the right and left half of the median eminence-arcuate nucleus region was examined in adult rats. Following right-sided orchidectomy, plasma FSH began to rise but a significant increase was not observed until 1 week after the operation. No significant changes were observed in LH values. LHRH content in the ipsilateral median eminence-arcuate region showed a significant increase only when the median eminence was removed together with the arcuate nucleus, but not when it was removed separately, which suggests that the increase in LHRH content was attributable to an increased LHRH content of the ipsilateral arcuate nucleus. Radiofrequency lesions placed unilaterally in the same side of the dorsal anterior hypothalamic area as the hemiorchidectomy partially blocked the selective FSH release following unilateral orchidectomy, while contralateral or sham lesions had no effect. These results suggest that the gonad has a direct neural connection with the hypothalamus, which is involved in selective FSH release following hemiorchidectomy.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          NEN
          Neuroendocrinology
          10.1159/issn.0028-3835
          Neuroendocrinology
          S. Karger AG
          0028-3835
          1423-0194
          1983
          1983
          27 March 2008
          : 37
          : 4
          : 291-296
          Affiliations
          Department of Physiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas, Dallas, Tex., USA
          Article
          123562 Neuroendocrinology 1983;37:291–296
          10.1159/000123562
          6415507
          © 1983 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 6
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article