2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predicting video saliency using crowdsourced mouse-tracking data

      Preprint
      ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper presents a new way of getting high-quality saliency maps for video, using a cheaper alternative to eye-tracking data. We designed a mouse-contingent video viewing system which simulates the viewers' peripheral vision based on the position of the mouse cursor. The system enables the use of mouse-tracking data recorded from an ordinary computer mouse as an alternative to real gaze fixations recorded by a more expensive eye-tracker. We developed a crowdsourcing system that enables the collection of such mouse-tracking data at large scale. Using the collected mouse-tracking data we showed that it can serve as an approximation of eye-tracking data. Moreover, trying to increase the efficiency of collected mouse-tracking data we proposed a novel deep neural network algorithm that improves the quality of mouse-tracking saliency maps.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          State-of-the-art in visual attention modeling.

          Modeling visual attention--particularly stimulus-driven, saliency-based attention--has been a very active research area over the past 25 years. Many different models of attention are now available which, aside from lending theoretical contributions to other fields, have demonstrated successful applications in computer vision, mobile robotics, and cognitive systems. Here we review, from a computational perspective, the basic concepts of attention implemented in these models. We present a taxonomy of nearly 65 models, which provides a critical comparison of approaches, their capabilities, and shortcomings. In particular, 13 criteria derived from behavioral and computational studies are formulated for qualitative comparison of attention models. Furthermore, we address several challenging issues with models, including biological plausibility of the computations, correlation with eye movement datasets, bottom-up and top-down dissociation, and constructing meaningful performance measures. Finally, we highlight current research trends in attention modeling and provide insights for future.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Actions in the Eye: Dynamic Gaze Datasets and Learnt Saliency Models for Visual Recognition

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Conference Proceedings: not found

              Spatio-Temporal Modeling and Prediction of Visual Attention in Graphical User Interfaces

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                30 June 2019
                Article
                1907.00480
                d3a1ed4f-9bc5-47a8-b787-7456a5f66576

                http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

                History
                Custom metadata
                cs.CV

                Computer vision & Pattern recognition
                Computer vision & Pattern recognition

                Comments

                Comment on this article