7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ethical decision-making frameworks assist in identifying the issues at stake in a particular setting and thinking through, in a methodical manner, the ethical issues that require consideration as well as the values that need to be considered and promoted. Decisions made about the use, sharing, and re-use of big data are complex and laden with values. This paper sets out an Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research developed by a working group convened by the Science, Health and Policy-relevant Ethics in Singapore (SHAPES) Initiative. It presents the aim and rationale for this framework supported by the underlying ethical concerns that relate to all health and research contexts. It also describes a set of substantive and procedural values that can be weighed up in addressing these concerns, and a step-by-step process for identifying, considering, and resolving the ethical issues arising from big data uses in health and research. This Framework is subsequently applied in the papers published in this Special Issue. These papers each address one of six domains where big data is currently employed: openness in big data and data repositories, precision medicine and big data, real-world data to generate evidence about healthcare interventions, AI-assisted decision-making in healthcare, public-private partnerships in healthcare and research, and cross-sectoral big data.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts.

              The capacity to collect and analyse data is growing exponentially. Referred to as 'Big Data', this scientific, social and technological trend has helped create destabilising amounts of information, which can challenge accepted social and ethical norms. Big Data remains a fuzzy idea, emerging across social, scientific, and business contexts sometimes seemingly related only by the gigantic size of the datasets being considered. As is often the case with the cutting edge of scientific and technological progress, understanding of the ethical implications of Big Data lags behind. In order to bridge such a gap, this article systematically and comprehensively analyses academic literature concerning the ethical implications of Big Data, providing a watershed for future ethical investigations and regulations. Particular attention is paid to biomedical Big Data due to the inherent sensitivity of medical information. By means of a meta-analysis of the literature, a thematic narrative is provided to guide ethicists, data scientists, regulators and other stakeholders through what is already known or hypothesised about the ethical risks of this emerging and innovative phenomenon. Five key areas of concern are identified: (1) informed consent, (2) privacy (including anonymisation and data protection), (3) ownership, (4) epistemology and objectivity, and (5) 'Big Data Divides' created between those who have or lack the necessary resources to analyse increasingly large datasets. Critical gaps in the treatment of these themes are identified with suggestions for future research. Six additional areas of concern are then suggested which, although related have not yet attracted extensive debate in the existing literature. It is argued that they will require much closer scrutiny in the immediate future: (6) the dangers of ignoring group-level ethical harms; (7) the importance of epistemology in assessing the ethics of Big Data; (8) the changing nature of fiduciary relationships that become increasingly data saturated; (9) the need to distinguish between 'academic' and 'commercial' Big Data practices in terms of potential harm to data subjects; (10) future problems with ownership of intellectual property generated from analysis of aggregated datasets; and (11) the difficulty of providing meaningful access rights to individual data subjects that lack necessary resources. Considered together, these eleven themes provide a thorough critical framework to guide ethical assessment and governance of emerging Big Data practices.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                vicki.xafis@nus.edu.sg
                Journal
                Asian Bioeth Rev
                Asian Bioeth Rev
                Asian Bioethics Review
                Springer Singapore (Singapore )
                1793-8759
                1793-9453
                1 October 2019
                1 October 2019
                September 2019
                : 11
                : 3
                : 227-254
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4280.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 6431, Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, ; National University of Singapore, Singapore
                [2 ]GRID grid.5379.8, ISNI 0000000121662407, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, , University of Manchester, ; Manchester, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.29980.3a, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7830, Department of Primary Health Care & General Practice, , University of Otago, ; Dunedin, New Zealand
                [4 ]GRID grid.59025.3b, ISNI 0000 0001 2224 0361, Division of Business Law, College of Business, ; Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
                [5 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, Sydney Health Ethics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, , The University of Sydney, ; Sydney, Australia
                [6 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, The University of Sydney Law School, ; Sydney, Australia
                [7 ]GRID grid.59025.3b, ISNI 0000 0001 2224 0361, School of Social Sciences, College of Humanities, Arts, & Social Sciences, ; Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
                [8 ]GRID grid.4305.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7988, School of Law and JK Mason Institute for Medicine, Life Sciences and the Law, , University of Edinburgh, ; Edinburgh, UK
                [9 ]GRID grid.4280.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 6431, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, ; National University of Singapore, Singapore
                [10 ]GRID grid.412106.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0621 9599, Division of Endocrinology, ; National University Hospital, Singapore
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5104-9686
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6915-6148
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-3986
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1097-0567
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2666-9557
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0234-657X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7125-4206
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3625-0899
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1571-8272
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2929-8966
                Article
                99
                10.1007/s41649-019-00099-x
                7747261
                33717314
                d3d24c84-84d4-4775-bf48-0945466dbaa5
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 2 August 2019
                : 28 August 2019
                : 29 August 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001349, National Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: NMRC Funding Initiative (SHAPES)
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © National University of Singapore and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

                ethics framework,health and research,open sharing,data repositories,precision medicine,real-world evidence,artificial intelligence,public-private partnership,cross-sectorial data

                Comments

                Comment on this article