131
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The EPR effect: Unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect

      , ,
      Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect is a unique phenomenon of solid tumors related to their anatomical and pathophysiological differences from normal tissues. For example, angiogenesis leads to high vascular density in solid tumors, large gaps exist between endothelial cells in tumor blood vessels, and tumor tissues show selective extravasation and retention of macromolecular drugs. This EPR effect served as a basis for development of macromolecular anticancer therapy. We demonstrated methods to enhance this effect artificially in clinical settings. Of great importance was increasing systolic blood pressure via slow angiotensin II infusion. Another strategy involved utilization of NO-releasing agents such as topical nitroglycerin, which releases nitrite. Nitrite is converted to NO more selectively in the tumor tissues, which leads to a significantly increased EPR effect and enhanced antitumor drug effects as well. This review discusses molecular mechanisms of factors related to the EPR effect, the unique anatomy of tumor vessels, limitations and techniques to avoid such limitations, augmenting tumor drug delivery, and experimental and clinical findings. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
          Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
          Elsevier BV
          0169409X
          March 2011
          March 2011
          : 63
          : 3
          : 136-151
          Article
          10.1016/j.addr.2010.04.009
          20441782
          d3eb42d9-5b63-4c48-b680-e29be51296a0
          © 2011

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article