14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How can we change medical students’ perceptions of a career in family medicine? Marketing or substance?

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Family Medicine (FM) is the care of unselected patients with undifferentiated problems in the settings where people need care in our communities. It is intellectually challenging, providing breadth and depth unparalleled in other areas of medical practice. In one survey only 19% of Israeli students reported being interested in FM. Students interested in FM had greater interest in bedside and direct long-term patient care. Students not planning FM residency training had preconceived notions that the discipline had lower academic opportunities and prestige. What can be done to increase student interest in careers in FM?

          This commentary includes perspectives of family practice leaders from several countries:

          The problem isn’t the students it is the scope of practice and expectations both of which can and should change if FM in Israel wants to stay viable. The scope of FM should be broadened to include more procedures and new technologies. This may also increase the earning potential of Family Practitioners (FPs). Payment policy and credentialing barriers should be change to expand scope of practice and allow FPs to practice at the full extent of their training.

          FM should offer clear professional horizon with potential for many sub-specialties and areas of focus. The Israeli HMOs, the Ministry of Health and the Israeli Association of FM should invest heavily in building academic departments of FM and promoting research. This will enhance the image of FM in the eyes of the students, the profession and the public.

          The clinical work environment should be improved by reducing bureaucratic assignments, such as issuing certifications, dealing with quality measurements and renewing chronic prescriptions. Much of this work can be done by nurse practitioners (NPs) working as part of an FP-led team. These NPs can also take care of patients with limited complaints to make the work of the FP more challenging and attractive.

          Training must include opportunities to develop longitudinal relationships with patients and families across problems and over time. It is these relationships that add value to the process of care, improve patient outcomes and provide meaning to sustain clinical careers that meet the needs of patients and communities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          What determines medical students’ career preference for general practice residency training?: a multicenter survey in Japan

          Background Few studies have systematically explored factors affecting medical students’ general practice career choice. We conducted a nationwide multicenter survey (Japan MEdical Career of Students: JMECS) to examine factors associated with students’ general practice career aspirations in Japan, where it has been decided that general practice will be officially acknowledged as a new discipline. Methods From April to December 2015, we distributed a 21-item questionnaire to final year medical students in 17 medical schools. The survey asked students about their top three career preferences from 19 specialty fields, their demographics and their career priorities. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the effect of each item. Results A total of 1264 responses were included in the analyses. The top three specialty choice were internal medicine: 833 (65.9%), general practice: 408 (32.3%), and pediatrics: 372 (29.4%). Among demographic factors, “plan to inherit other’s practice” positively associated with choosing general practice, whereas “having physician parent” had negative correlation. After controlling for potential confounders, students who ranked the following items as highly important were more likely to choose general practice: “clinical diagnostic reasoning (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.65, 95% CI 1.40–1.94)”, “community-oriented practice (aOR: 1.33, 95% CI 1.13–1.57)”, and” involvement in preventive medicine (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI 1.01–1.38)”. On the contrary, “acute care rather than chronic care”, “mastering advanced procedures”, and “depth rather than breadth of practice” were less likely to be associated with general practice aspiration. Conclusions Our nationwide multicenter survey found several features associated with general practice career aspirations: clinical diagnostic reasoning; community-oriented practice; and preventive medicine. These results can be fundamental to future research and the development of recruitment strategies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Primary care specialty career choice among Canadian medical students: Understanding the factors that influence their decisions.

            To identify which factors influence medical students' decision to choose a career in family medicine and pediatrics, and which factors influence their decision to choose careers in non-front-line specialties.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Institution-Specific Factors Associated With Family Medicine Residency Match Rates.

              Phenomenon: Existing research provides little specific evidence regarding the association between public and private medical school curricular settings and the proportion of medical students matching into family medicine careers. Institutional differences have been inadequately investigated, as students who match into family medicine are often consolidated into the umbrella of primary care along with those matching in internal medicine and pediatrics. However, understanding medical school contexts in relation to career choice is critical toward designing targeted strategies to address the projected shortage of family physicians. This study examines factors associated with family medicine residency match rates and the extent to which such factors differ across medical school settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                amnonl@ekmd.huji.ac.il
                ABazemore@aafp.org
                davorina.petek@gmail.com
                wphllps@uw.edu
                djm23@georgetown.edu
                Journal
                Isr J Health Policy Res
                Isr J Health Policy Res
                Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                2045-4015
                25 August 2018
                25 August 2018
                2018
                : 7
                : 52
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Departments of Family Medicine, Hebrew University & Clalit Health Services, Jerusalem, Israel
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0538, GRID grid.9619.7, Faculty of Medicine, , The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, ; Ein Kerem, P.O. Box 12271, 9112102 Jerusalem, Israel
                [3 ]Robert Graham Center Policy Studies in Family Medicine & Primary Care, 1133 Connecticut Ave, NW Ste#1100, Washington, DC, 20036 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0721 6013, GRID grid.8954.0, Department of Family medicine Faculty of Medicine, , University of Ljubljana, ; Poljanski nasip 58, 1000 Ljubljan, Slovenia
                [5 ]ISNI 0000000122986657, GRID grid.34477.33, Family Medicine, , University of Washington, ; Box 356390, Seattle, WA 98195-6390 USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2186 0438, GRID grid.411667.3, Department of Human Science, , Research Programs Family Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, School of Nursing and Health Studies, ; Building D 240, 4000 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington, DC, 20007 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6824-5077
                Article
                248
                10.1186/s13584-018-0248-6
                6109329
                30143049
                d3fb8ae0-c8be-49d3-950e-1918f1eda8fe
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 21 May 2018
                : 7 August 2018
                Categories
                Commentary
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Economics of health & social care
                family medicine,medical education,medical students,career choice,medical specialty

                Comments

                Comment on this article