1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of primary PCI on the recovery of atrioventricular block in inferior STEMI patients with late presentation (>12 hours): insights from a single center 10-year experience

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is no definite reperfusion time for inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting later than 12 hours after symptom onset and complicated by newly-developed atrioventricular block (AVB). It is not clear whether the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could facilitate the recovery of AVB in this patient group. We conducted a retrospective study including 52 consecutive inferior STEMI patients with presenting time >12 hours and new onset second or third-degree AVB on admission. All of them underwent PCI. The clinical characteristics, time to PCI and time to AVB improvement after symptom onset were studied. There were 42 males and the mean age was 61±10 years. Median presenting time from symptom onset was 36 hours (ranging 13–192 hours). Median time to PCI was 6.0 days (ranging 1–15 days) and median time of AVB improvement from symptom onset was 5.0 days (ranging 1–15 days). 24 patients got improvement of atrioventricular conduction before PCI procedure (defined as preoperative group) while 28 patients got improvement of atrioventricular conduction after PCI procedure (defined as postoperative group). In the postoperative group, there was a strong association between time to PCI and time to AVB improvement (R 2=0.752, p=0.000). No adverse PCI procedure-related complications or death occurred and all the patients got complete AVB recovery at discharge. Early PCI is safe and should be recommended as the priority strategy for late presenting inferior STEMI patients when complicated by AVB. Successful reperfusion of the infarct-related artery is helpful to facilitate AVB recovery in this situation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction.

            It is unclear whether stable, high-risk patients with persistent total occlusion of the infarct-related coronary artery identified after the currently accepted period for myocardial salvage has passed should undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in addition to receiving optimal medical therapy to reduce the risk of subsequent events. We conducted a randomized study involving 2166 stable patients who had total occlusion of the infarct-related artery 3 to 28 days after myocardial infarction and who met a high-risk criterion (an ejection fraction of <50% or proximal occlusion). Of these patients, 1082 were assigned to routine PCI and stenting with optimal medical therapy, and 1084 were assigned to optimal medical therapy alone. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial reinfarction, or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure. The 4-year cumulative primary event rate was 17.2% in the PCI group and 15.6% in the medical therapy group (hazard ratio for death, reinfarction, or heart failure in the PCI group as compared with the medical therapy group, 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.45; P=0.20). Rates of myocardial reinfarction (fatal and nonfatal) were 7.0% and 5.3% in the two groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.00; P=0.13). Rates of nonfatal reinfarction were 6.9% and 5.0%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.96 to 2.16; P=0.08); only six reinfarctions (0.6%) were related to assigned PCI procedures. Rates of NYHA class IV heart failure (4.4% vs. 4.5%) and death (9.1% vs. 9.4%) were similar. There was no interaction between treatment effect and any subgroup variable (age, sex, race or ethnic group, infarct-related artery, ejection fraction, diabetes, Killip class, and the time from myocardial infarction to randomization). PCI did not reduce the occurrence of death, reinfarction, or heart failure, and there was a trend toward excess reinfarction during 4 years of follow-up in stable patients with occlusion of the infarct-related artery 3 to 28 days after myocardial infarction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004562 [ClinicalTrials.gov].). Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Infarct size and myocardial salvage after primary angioplasty in patients presenting with symptoms for <12 h vs. 12-72 h.

              Primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is recommended only if symptom duration is 50% of AAR) was observed in 41% of late presenters despite total infarct-artery occlusion. FIS is larger in late presenters (>12 h) than early presenters after primary angioplasty for STEMI. However, substantial myocardial salvage can be obtained beyond the 12 h limit, even when the infarct-related artery is totally occluded.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Investig Med
                J. Investig. Med
                jim
                jim
                Journal of Investigative Medicine
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                1081-5589
                1708-8267
                June 2020
                25 March 2020
                : 68
                : 5
                : 1011-1014
                Affiliations
                [1] departmentDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine , The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University , Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Ling Bai, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University Medical College First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an 710061, China; 8587@ 123456xjtufh.edu.cn
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4671
                Article
                jim-2019-001255
                10.1136/jim-2019-001255
                7306870
                32217628
                d42581c6-afc5-4259-8c84-0a77d3c5bb29
                © American Federation for Medical Research 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, an indication of whether changes were made, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 25 February 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Clinical Research Award of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, China;
                Award ID: XJTU1AF-CRF-2019-011
                Categories
                Brief Report
                1507
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked
                editors-choice
                free

                heart block,myocardial infarction,percutaneous coronary intervention

                Comments

                Comment on this article