0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Liquid Biopsy Testing Can Improve Selection of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients to Rechallenge with Gefitinib

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The ICARUS trial is a phase II, open label, multicenter, single arm study conducted to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a rechallenge treatment with the first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients carrying activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR). The ICARUS trial enrolled 61 patients who were rechallenged with gefitinib at progression after second-line chemotherapy. Serum-derived circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) collected before the rechallenge from a cohort of 29 patients, was retrospectively analyzed for the EGFR exon 19 deletions and for the p.L858R and p.T790M single nucleotide variants (SNV). The analysis of cfDNA detected the same EGFR activating mutation reported in the tumor tissue in 20/29 patients, with a sensitivity of 69%. Moreover, a p.T790M variant was found in 14/29 patients (48.3%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months for p.T790M positive patients (CI 95% 1.4–3.1 months) versus 3.5 months for the p.T790M negative patients (CI 95% 1.6–5.3 months), resulting in a statistically significant difference (Long rank test p = 0.0180). These findings confirmed the role of the p.T790M mutation in the resistance to first-generation TKIs. More importantly, our data suggest that TKI rechallenge should be guided by biomarker testing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Availability of evidence of benefits on overall survival and quality of life of cancer drugs approved by European Medicines Agency: retrospective cohort study of drug approvals 2009-13

          Objective To determine the availability of data on overall survival and quality of life benefits of cancer drugs approved in Europe. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Publicly accessible regulatory and scientific reports on cancer approvals by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) from 2009 to 2013. Main outcome measures Pivotal and postmarketing trials of cancer drugs according to their design features (randomisation, crossover, blinding), comparators, and endpoints. Availability and magnitude of benefit on overall survival or quality of life determined at time of approval and after market entry. Validated European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) used to assess the clinical value of the reported gains in published studies of cancer drugs. Results From 2009 to 2013, the EMA approved the use of 48 cancer drugs for 68 indications. Of these, eight indications (12%) were approved on the basis of a single arm study. At the time of market approval, there was significant prolongation of survival in 24 of the 68 (35%). The magnitude of the benefit on overall survival ranged from 1.0 to 5.8 months (median 2.7 months). At the time of market approval, there was an improvement in quality of life in seven of 68 indications (10%). Out of 44 indications for which there was no evidence of a survival gain at the time of market authorisation, in the subsequent postmarketing period there was evidence for extension of life in three (7%) and reported benefit on quality of life in five (11%). Of the 68 cancer indications with EMA approval, and with a median of 5.4 years’ follow-up (minimum 3.3 years, maximum 8.1 years), only 35 (51%) had shown a significant improvement in survival or quality of life, while 33 (49%) remained uncertain. Of 23 indications associated with a survival benefit that could be scored with the ESMO-MCBS tool, the benefit was judged to be clinically meaningful in less than half (11/23, 48%). Conclusions This systematic evaluation of oncology approvals by the EMA in 2009-13 shows that most drugs entered the market without evidence of benefit on survival or quality of life. At a minimum of 3.3 years after market entry, there was still no conclusive evidence that these drugs either extended or improved life for most cancer indications. When there were survival gains over existing treatment options or placebo, they were often marginal.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rebiopsy of non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor: Comparison between T790M mutation-positive and mutation-negative populations.

            The secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation Thr790Met (T790M) accounts for approximately half of acquired resistances to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Recent reports have demonstrated that the emergence of T790M predicts a favorable prognosis and indolent progression. However, rebiopsy to confirm T790M status can be challenging due to limited tissue availability and procedural feasibility, and little is known regarding the differences among patients with or without T790M mutation. The study investigated 78 EGFR-mutant patients who had undergone rebiopsy after TKI failure. The peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction clamp method was used in EGFR mutational analyses. Various patient characteristics and postprogression survivals (PPSs) after initial TKI failure were retrospectively compared in patients with and without T790M. The T790M mutation was identified in 4 (17%) of 24 central nervous system lesions, and in 22 (41%) of 54 other lesions (P = .0417). No other characteristics had a statistical association with T790M prevalence. Median PPS was 31.4 months in 26 patients with T790M, and 11.4 months in 52 patients without T790M (P = .0017). In the multivariate analysis, statistically significant factors for longer PPS included T790M-positive, good performance status, and no carcinomatous meningitis. The emergence of T790M in central nervous system lesions was rare, compared with other lesions. Patients with T790M after TKI failure appear to have better prognoses than those without T790M. TKI rechallenge or continuous administration beyond progression may be effective after initial TKI failure. © 2013 American Cancer Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Resistant to First-Line Gefitinib (IMPRESS): Overall Survival and Biomarker Analyses.

              Purpose The Iressa Mutation-Positive Multicentre Treatment Beyond ProgRESsion Study (IMPRESS) compared the continuation of gefitinib plus chemotherapy with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with progression (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1) after first-line gefitinib. Primary results indicated no difference between treatments in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). The current analysis presents final, mature, overall survival (OS) data, together with exploratory analyses that examined whether specific biomarkers, including T790M mutation status, were able to differentiate a relative treatment effect. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib 250 mg or placebo, in addition to cisplatin 75 mg/m2plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2(maximum of six cycles of chemotherapy). EGFR mutation status was determined from plasma-derived circulating free tumor-derived DNA samples (beads, emulsification, amplification, and magnetics digital polymerase chain reaction assay, allelic fraction analysis). Results A total of 265 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned, and overall data maturity was 66%. Continuation of gefitinib plus cisplatin and pemetrexed was detrimental to OS when compared with placebo plus cisplatin and pemetrexed (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.94; P = .016; median OS, 13.4 v 19.5 months). The detriment was statistically significant in patients with T790M mutation-positive plasma samples (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.21), whereas statistical significance was not reached in T790M mutation-negative patients (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.94). PFS in T790M mutation-positive patients was similar between treatments, and the difference observed in T790M mutation-negative patients did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.03; P = .0745). Conclusion Final OS data from IMPRESS are supportive of earlier PFS results and are sufficient to warn physicians against the continuation of treatment with first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors beyond radiologic disease progression when chemotherapy is initiated. Plasma biomarker analyses suggest that this effect may be driven by T790M-positive status.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                25 September 2019
                October 2019
                : 11
                : 10
                : 1431
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istiuto Nazionale Tumori “Fondazione G. Pascale”-IRCCS, 80131 Naples, Italy; r.espositoabate@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (R.E.A.); raffaella.pasquale@ 123456hotmail.it (R.P.); a.sacco@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it (A.S.)
                [2 ]Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy; m.piccirillo@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it
                [3 ]Medical Oncology, Thoracic Department, Istiuto Nazionale Tumori “Fondazione G. Pascale”-IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy; a.morabito@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it
                [4 ]Department of Oncology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Monza, Presidio San Gerardo, 20900 Monza, Italy; p.bidoli@ 123456hsgerardo.org
                [5 ]Department of Oncology & Hematology, Humanitas Clinical & Research Center, 20089 Rozzano (MI), Italy; giovanna.finocchiaro@ 123456cancercenter.humanitas.it
                [6 ]Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, University of Perugia, 06129 Perugia, Italy; rita.chiari@ 123456aulss6.veneto.it
                [7 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCSS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; luisa.foltran@ 123456cro.it
                [8 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santo Spirito, 15033 Casale Monferrato, Italy; rbuosi@ 123456aslal.it
                [9 ]Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy; mtiseo@ 123456ao.pr.it
                [10 ]Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy; laura.giannetta@ 123456ospedaleniguarda.it
                [11 ]Division of Pulmonary Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli Monaldi, 80131 Naples, Italy; ciro.battiloro@ 123456ospedalideicolli.it
                [12 ]Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Santa Maria della Misericordia, 33100 Udine, Italy; gianpiero.fasola@ 123456asuiud.sanita.fvg.it
                [13 ]Presidio Ospedaliero Vito Fazzi, 73100 Lecce, Italy; oncologia.polecce@ 123456ausl.le.it
                [14 ]AOU Città della salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy; l.ciuffreda@ 123456libero.it
                [15 ]Arcispedale S. Anna, Ferrara 44124, Italy; a.frassoldati@ 123456ospfe.it
                [16 ]Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20122 Milan, Italy; filippo.demarinis@ 123456ieo.it
                [17 ]Director Oncology and Hematology Department, AUSL Romagna, 48121 Ravenna, Italy; federico.cappuzzo@ 123456auslromagna.it
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: n.normanno@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it ; Tel./Fax: +39-081-5903826
                [†]

                Both authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7621-1320
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9553-8465
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1254-4705
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7158-2605
                Article
                cancers-11-01431
                10.3390/cancers11101431
                6826724
                31557965
                d43c631f-fa50-49da-a8c6-4ee50f79f207
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 07 August 2019
                : 20 September 2019
                Categories
                Article

                non-small-cell lung cancer,rechallenge,resistance,liquid biopsy,p.t790m

                Comments

                Comment on this article