41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Men Who Have Sex With Men–Friendly Doctor Finder Hackathon in Guangzhou, China: Development of a Mobile Health Intervention to Enhance Health Care Utilization

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Mobile health (mHeath)–based HIV and sexual health promotion among men who have sex with men (MSM) is feasible in low- and middle-income settings. However, many currently available mHealth tools on the market were developed by the private sector for profit and have limited input from MSM communities.

          Objective

          A health hackathon is an intensive contest that brings together participants from multidisciplinary backgrounds to develop a proposed solution for a specific health issue within a short period. The purpose of this paper was to describe a hackathon event that aimed to develop an mHealth tool to enhance health care (specifically HIV prevention) utilization among Chinese MSM, summarize characteristics of the final prototypes, and discuss implications for future mHealth intervention development.

          Methods

          The hackathon took place in Guangzhou, China. An open call for hackathon participants was advertised on 3 Chinese social media platforms, including Blued, a popular social networking app among MSM. All applicants completed a Web-based survey and were then scored. The top scoring applicants were grouped into teams based on their skills and content area expertise. Each team was allowed 1 month to prepare for the hackathon. The teams then came together in person with on-site expert mentorship for a 72-hour hackathon contest to develop and present mHealth prototype solutions. The judging panel included experts in psychology, public health, computer science, social media, clinical medicine, and MSM advocacy. The final prototypes were evaluated based on innovation, usability, and feasibility.

          Results

          We received 92 applicants, and 38 of them were selected to attend the April 2019 hackathon. A total of 8 teams were formed, including expertise in computer science, user interface design, business or marketing, clinical medicine, and public health. Moreover, 24 participants self-identified as gay, and 3 participants self-identified as bisexual. All teams successfully developed a prototype tool. A total of 4 prototypes were designed as a mini program that could be embedded within a popular Chinese social networking app, and 3 prototypes were designed as stand-alone apps. Common prototype functions included Web-based physician searching based on one’s location (8 prototypes), health education (4 prototypes), Web-based health counseling with providers or lay health volunteers (6 prototypes), appointment scheduling (8 prototypes), and between-user communication (2 prototypes). All prototypes included strategies to ensure privacy protection for MSM users, and some prototypes offered strategies to ensure privacy of physicians. The selected prototypes are undergoing pilot testing.

          Conclusions

          This study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of using a hackathon to create mHealth intervention tools. This suggests a different pathway to developing mHealth interventions and could be relevant in other settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions

          Background Government policy increasingly supports engaging communities to promote health. It is critical to consider whether such strategies are effective, for whom, and under what circumstances. However, ‘community engagement’ is defined in diverse ways and employed for different reasons. Considering the theory and context we developed a conceptual framework which informs understanding about what makes an effective (or ineffective) community engagement intervention. Methods We conducted a systematic review of community engagement in public health interventions using: stakeholder involvement; searching, screening, appraisal and coding of research literature; and iterative thematic syntheses and meta-analysis. A conceptual framework of community engagement was refined, following interactions between the framework and each review stage. Results From 335 included reports, three products emerged: (1) two strong theoretical ‘meta-narratives’: one, concerning the theory and practice of empowerment/engagement as an independent objective; and a more utilitarian perspective optimally configuring health services to achieve defined outcomes. These informed (2) models that were operationalized in subsequent meta-analysis. Both refined (3) the final conceptual framework. This identified multiple dimensions by which community engagement interventions may differ. Diverse combinations of intervention purpose, theory and implementation were noted, including: ways of defining communities and health needs; initial motivations for community engagement; types of participation; conditions and actions necessary for engagement; and potential issues influencing impact. Some dimensions consistently co-occurred, leading to three overarching models of effective engagement which either: utilised peer-led delivery; employed varying degrees of collaboration between communities and health services; or built on empowerment philosophies. Conclusions Our conceptual framework and models are useful tools for considering appropriate and effective approaches to community engagement. These should be tested and adapted to facilitate intervention design and evaluation. Using this framework may disentangle the relative effectiveness of different models of community engagement, promoting effective, sustainable and appropriate initiatives.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Community mobilization, empowerment and HIV prevention among female sex workers in south India

            Background While community mobilization has been widely endorsed as an important component of HIV prevention among vulnerable populations such as female sex workers (FSWs), there is uncertainty as to the mechanism through which it impacts upon HIV risk. We explored the hypothesis that individual and collective empowerment of FSW is an outcome of community mobilization, and we examined the means through which HIV risk and vulnerability reduction as well as personal and social transformation are achieved. Methods This study was conducted in five districts in south India, where community mobilization programs are implemented as part of the Avahan program (India AIDS Initiative) of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. We used a theoretically derived “integrated empowerment framework” to conduct a secondary analysis of a representative behavioural tracking survey conducted among 1,750 FSWs. We explored the associations between involvement with community mobilization programs, self-reported empowerment (defined as three domains including power within to represent self-esteem and confidence, power with as a measure of collective identity and solidarity, and power over as access to social entitlements, which were created using Principal Components analysis), and outcomes of HIV risk reduction and social transformation. Results In multivariate analysis, we found that engagement with HIV programs and community mobilization activities was associated with the domains of empowerment. Power within and power with were positively associated with more program contact (p < .01 and p < .001 respectively). These measures of empowerment were also associated with outcomes of “personal transformation” in terms of self-efficacy for condom and health service use (p < .001). Collective empowerment (power with others) was most strongly associated with “social transformation” variables including higher autonomy and reduced violence and coercion, particularly in districts with programs of longer duration (p < .05). Condom use with clients was associated with power with others (p < .001), while power within was associated with more condom use with regular partners (p < .01) and higher service utilization (p < .05). Conclusion These findings support the hypothesis that community mobilization has benefits for empowering FSWs both individually and collectively. HIV prevention is strengthened by improving their ability to address different psycho-social and community-level sources of their vulnerability. Future challenges include the need to develop social, political and legal contexts that support community mobilization of FSWs, and to prospectively measure the impact of combined community-level interventions on measures of empowerment as a means to HIV prevention.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recent mobile health interventions to support medication adherence among HIV-positive MSM.

              We describe recent mobile health (mHealth) interventions supporting antiretroviral therapy (ART) medication adherence among HIV-positive MSM.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
                JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
                JMU
                JMIR mHealth and uHealth
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2291-5222
                February 2020
                27 February 2020
                : 8
                : 2
                : e16030
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Health Behavior Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC United States
                [2 ] Social Entrepreneurship to Spur Health Global Guangzhou China
                [3 ] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Project-China Guangzhou China
                [4 ] Global and Community Mental Health Research Group Department of Psychology University of Macau Macau China
                [5 ] Dermatology Hospital Southern Medical University Guangzhou China
                [6 ] Department of Health, Behavior and Society Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD United States
                [7 ] Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy Rutgers School of Public Health Piscataway, NJ United States
                [8 ] Core Faculty Rutgers Global Health Institute Piscataway, NJ United States
                [9 ] Danlan Goodness Beijing China
                [10 ] Department of Global Health and Development London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Joseph D Tucker jdtucker@ 123456med.unc.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9388-1799
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3461-8688
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3076-1049
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9026-707X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9358-2377
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8522-3240
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4424-5523
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-4603
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5003-0895
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1851-2568
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0401-7753
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2622-6588
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2804-1181
                Article
                v8i2e16030
                10.2196/16030
                7068469
                32130189
                d445a95c-8e64-48a3-8759-454e5f15a170
                ©Chunyan Li, Yuan Xiong, Hao Fong Sit, Weiming Tang, Brian J Hall, Kathryn E Muessig, Chongyi Wei, Huanyu Bao, Shufang Wei, Dapeng Zhang, Guodong Mi, Fei Yu, Joseph D Tucker. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 27.02.2020.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 3 September 2019
                : 19 October 2019
                : 2 November 2019
                : 15 December 2019
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                mobile health,hackathon,crowdsourcing,men who have sex with men,msm-friendly,health care utilization

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log