Mental health laws and acts usually have a long history behind them when they are
eventually adopted. In most jurisdictions the time spent between initial discussions
and drafts and the formal adoption of mental health legislation is not less than 10
years. Lesser regulatory instruments, such as ministerial decrees, orders of service
and the like have a more immediate effect, although they tend to draw less attention
and debate. In many cases the content of the law simply confirms and codifies the
practice of mental health services as it existed over the extended period of drafting
the law.[1] Things have not been different with the Mental Health Law of the Peoplés
Republic of China,[2] recently adopted after more than 15 drafts and 20 years of debate.
Although it will not come into force until May 2013, its influence could already be
perceived in practice throughout China over the last decades because its successive
drafts (or section of them) were de facto implemented by mental health authorities
in diverse Chinese provinces.
There are several innovative facets of China's new mental health law that deserve
closer scrutiny, particularly the importance given to promotion and prevention, to
psychological support as part of emergency response plans, and to rehabilitation.
In this letter I would like to specifically draw attention to the section on rehabilitation,
an area that is absent or, at best, minimally addressed in the mental health laws
and acts of most high-income countries.
Historically, mental health laws were primarily concerned with consent (i.e., regulations
about involuntary admissions), and only gradually incorporated issues related to treatment
of people with mental disorders. The implications of legal distinctions between admission
and treatment (i.e., admission as a security measure or admission as a prerequisite
for treatment) only became relevant after the Italian Psychiatric Reform with the
adoption of Italian Law 180.[3] In the two large international reviews of mental health
laws conducted under the aegis of the World Health Organization[4],[5] rehabilitation
was not identified as a main topic for comparison across different jurisdictions.
At most, a few progressive documents examined as part of the reviews had some provisions
on social integration of persons with mental disorders.[5]
However, in the Chinese Law, rehabilitation is one of its three major content sections,
the other two being promotion and prevention, and diagnosis and treatment (the remaining
sections are more procedural in nature). Article 54 through Article 59 in the law
specifically addresses the provision of community-based rehabilitation to people with
mental disorders and the provision of support to families of persons with mental disorders.
The high degree of detail in these articles is uncommon in major national laws. For
instance, in Article 54 the type of rehabilitative training required is specified:
‘training in life skills, social skills and other skills to persons with mental disorders
who need rehabilitation.’
In line with the WHÓs position that ongoing treatment is an integral part of psychosocial
rehabilitation,[ 6] Article 55 stipulates that as part of the rehabilitation of mental
disorders ‘medical facilities shall provide maintenance treatment with basic psychiatric
medications to persons with severe mental disorders.’ Psychosocial researchers and
health managers might appreciate another part of Article 55, which establishes a health
registry for people with severe mental disorders, a fundamental tool for research
and management that is gradually being banned in high-income countries largely because
of concerns about the potential infringement on individual rights. The second paragraph
of the article encapsulates in a few lines a whole agenda for the appropriate integration
of community mental health care into general health care, a dream for many mental
health care activists.
Finally, Article 58 rightly addresses the ultimate goal of a sound mental health rehabilitation
program, namely, ‘suitable work for persons with mental disorders based on their actual
capabilities.’ The article also highlights major issues that need to be addressed
when organizing work for persons with mental disorders including ‘equal pay and equal
treatment’, job training, improvement of the work environment, and rewarding work
accomplishments.
This emphasis on rehabilitation is in line with the importance China has placed on
the so-called ‘secondgeneration human rights,’ that is, social, economic and cultural
rights.[7] It is not known how much the expert committees and legislators who drafted
China's mental health law benefited from the long history of mental health legislation
in other countries. However, at the very least, in the area of legislation about the
rehabilitation for people with mental disorders, other countries have a lot to benefit
from a careful reading of the new Mental Health Law of the Peoplés Republic of China.