43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Family Affair

      editorial
      Journal of Family Nursing
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A new viral illness called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently spreading throughout the world at an alarming rate (Dong et al., 2020). As family nursing practitioners, educators, and researchers, we work from a guiding assumption that health and “illness is a family affair” (Wright & Bell, 2009, p. ix). Patients, clients, residents, and their families are inextricably connected. The science and practice of Family Nursing is based on a systemic premise offered by Wright and Leahey (2013) that serious illness and life challenges impact the family unit, and reciprocally, the functioning of the family unit (including their structure, development, and function) influences the health and well-being of each family member. This especially holds true for the current coronavirus pandemic which is creating unique hardships and suffering in an alarmingly large number of patients and their families around the world. Impact of COVID-19 on Families The assumption that disease and its prevention is a family affair is manifested in the full spectrum and scale of the current coronavirus pandemic. Measures that have been taken in many countries to control the spread of the coronavirus are having a disruptive effect on relationships in general and family relationships specifically. Families are reporting loss of community and freedom of movement in response to quarantine/lock down measures. Other tangible losses include income, access to resources, and planned activities or celebrations. Compelling and heartbreaking stories of the challenges and suffering that families are experiencing engulf us. Individuals and families who are most vulnerable are particularly at risk. Patients, Clients, and Residents Miss Their Family and Loved Ones Residents in long-term care facilities miss their partners and children who are no longer allowed to visit because of the COVID-19 policies to contain the spread of the coronavirus. People with intellectual disabilities who live in institutions are upset because their father, mother, brothers, or sisters are no longer allowed to visit, and they often cannot understand why. Distressing stories abound of patients who have to deal with the news of their COVID-19 diagnosis all by themselves without a family member present and those patients who are admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) who have to say goodbye to their family in the emergency department not knowing whether they will see each other again. A nurse working at the front line of triage reported, “His family was not allowed to come to the hospital, because they may also be infected. He was alone and couldn’t say goodbye.” Families are Concerned About Their Loved Ones Many of these patients, clients, and residents are members of families who miss their loved ones and who are worried. Mothers, fathers, and other family members of children receiving psychiatric care report being unable visit their child for an extended period of time and are afraid their child will become ill from the coronavirus. Families of very seriously ill and dying patients are not allowed to visit their loved one and may not be able to say a final goodbye. Families and Family Relationships Are Under Pressure The lockdown/quarantine measures instituted in many countries have also invited vulnerability and risk within families. Schools are being closed which leads to distress in many families not accustomed to being so closely confined for a long time period. Moreover, as a result of the COVID-19 crisis, much, if not all, of the support given to families who provide long-term care for an ill parent, partner, or child is lost. Families with a child who requires specialized care and guidance now have to care for their child 24 hr a day without the outside guidance provided by medical nursery, daycare, or special education services. Families who care for a father, mother, or partner with dementia or other serious illness now have to manage without day care or daytime activity. School closures have created a family environment where children are rarely allowed to leave the house and are confronted by the vulnerabilities of a family member’s addiction, aggression, and violence. Children of divorced co-parents are suddenly being refused alternating parental care because one of the parents now works from home and cannot provide child care. All of these families and their interrelationships are often under great pressure as a result of the stresses created by coronavirus pandemic. The Urgent Need for Family Nursing Now and in the Aftermath of COVID-19 Health care professionals, including nurses and doctors, are also going through a very intensive and perhaps traumatic time. As a nurse working in the ICU reported, “Many people die without family present. The sorrow that comes with it hurts the nurses mentally.” It is encouraging to see how innovative and creative many nurses are becoming during this pandemic as they find ways to involve families. Despite being committed to the care of the ill person, they assure families that their family member is being cared for and will not die alone. They are sometimes able to connect family members to each other using new technology. Mobile phone or video conference calls made by the nurse allow family members to “see” the patient in the ICU or in the nursing home. Our concerns also focus on the long-term implications for patients and their families; how will they cope once the coronavirus is under control? How will they be able to resume normal life again? Individuals and families are often flexible and resilient (Walsh, 2016) and many will likely be able to process the experiences of this pandemic and resume their lives. However, there will also be long-term mental and physical health consequences or even permanent damage. For example, how will patients and families recover after a long period of intensive care? Research has documented that many patients experience many physical and psychological problems after such a long period of ventilation, even after discharge to their home environment (Rawal et al., 2017). We also know that family members of these patients also suffer greater levels of depression and anxiety (Davidson et al., 2012). We also hold our hearts out for families who have lost someone without being able to say goodbye and without being able to be present in the final dying phase of their loved one. How will we assist these families to cope with their loss and complex grief? Our concerns also go out to the health care professionals, especially nurses and doctors, in the aftermath of this COVID-19 crisis. They too will need support in recovering from their suffering and distress. The good news is that there is compelling evidence that our family nursing assessment and intervention skills can assist families to heal. This pandemic makes us more deeply aware of the important role of family in the lives of patients, clients, and residents. We anticipate that this increased awareness will help us advocate even more strongly for the importance of family nursing during and after this coronavirus crisis. Rightfully, a great amount of money and resources are now being spent to fight the COVID-19 virus. But lives saved must also be lives worth living afterwards. We believe that family nursing knowledge, developed over the last 40 years, unequivocally offers the necessary skills to help families recover and heal from the expected and unexpected long-term consequences of this pandemic (International, Family, Nursing, & Association, 2015, 2017). The aftermath of COVID-19 calls for a substantial increase in the resources needed to (a) enable nurses to assess and intervene with families in need of support, (b) educate nurses to offer highly skilled family nursing care, and (c) conduct research which provides compelling evidence that family nursing assessment and intervention is effective in addressing illness suffering (Wright, 2017; Wright & Bell, 2009) and optimizing family health. Family nursing has never been more relevant or more urgently needed than now. This Guest Editorial has been written by members of the FAMily health in Europe-Research in Nursing (FAME-RN) group: Marie Louise A. Luttik, PhD, RN, Professor in Family Nursing & Family Care, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Research Group Nursing Diagnostics, Groningen, the Netherlands. Email: m.l.a.luttik@pl.hanze.nl ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7853-9773 Romy Mahrer-Imhof, PhD, Professor for Family-Centered Care, Nursing Science & Care Limited, Winterthur, Switzerland; Visiting Professor, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark. Email: romy.mahrer@ns-c.ch ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8587-3817 Cristina García-Vivar, PhD, RN, Senior Associate Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre; Researcher, IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Spain. Email: cristina.garciavivar@unavarra.es ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-559X Anne Brødsgaard, PhD, RN, Senior Researcher, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager Hvidovre; The Capital Region of Denmark & Section for Nursing, Department of Public Health; The Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Denmark. Email: anne.broedsgaard.madsen@regionh.dk ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5029-9480 Karin B. Dieperink, PhD, RN, Associate Professor, Head of research, Family focused health care research Center (FaCe) and Vice Head, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Email: Karin.dieperink@rsyd.dk ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4766-3242 Lorenz Imhof, PhD, Professor for Community-Based Care, Nursing Science & Care Limited, Winterthur, Switzerland. Email: lorenz.imhof@ns-c.ch ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8441-3598 Birte Østergaard, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark. Email: boestergaard@health.sdu.dk ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9094-8123 Erla Kolbrun Svavarsdottir, RN, PhD, FAAN, Professor, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Iceland. Email: eks@hi.is ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1284-1088 Hanne Konradsen, PhD, Professor, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Denmark, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Associate Professor, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, NVS, Karolinska Instituttet, Sweden. Email: hanne.konradsen@regionh.dk ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7477-125

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time

          In December, 2019, a local outbreak of pneumonia of initially unknown cause was detected in Wuhan (Hubei, China), and was quickly determined to be caused by a novel coronavirus, 1 namely severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The outbreak has since spread to every province of mainland China as well as 27 other countries and regions, with more than 70 000 confirmed cases as of Feb 17, 2020. 2 In response to this ongoing public health emergency, we developed an online interactive dashboard, hosted by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, to visualise and track reported cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in real time. The dashboard, first shared publicly on Jan 22, illustrates the location and number of confirmed COVID-19 cases, deaths, and recoveries for all affected countries. It was developed to provide researchers, public health authorities, and the general public with a user-friendly tool to track the outbreak as it unfolds. All data collected and displayed are made freely available, initially through Google Sheets and now through a GitHub repository, along with the feature layers of the dashboard, which are now included in the Esri Living Atlas. The dashboard reports cases at the province level in China; at the city level in the USA, Australia, and Canada; and at the country level otherwise. During Jan 22–31, all data collection and processing were done manually, and updates were typically done twice a day, morning and night (US Eastern Time). As the outbreak evolved, the manual reporting process became unsustainable; therefore, on Feb 1, we adopted a semi-automated living data stream strategy. Our primary data source is DXY, an online platform run by members of the Chinese medical community, which aggregates local media and government reports to provide cumulative totals of COVID-19 cases in near real time at the province level in China and at the country level otherwise. Every 15 min, the cumulative case counts are updated from DXY for all provinces in China and for other affected countries and regions. For countries and regions outside mainland China (including Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan), we found DXY cumulative case counts to frequently lag behind other sources; we therefore manually update these case numbers throughout the day when new cases are identified. To identify new cases, we monitor various Twitter feeds, online news services, and direct communication sent through the dashboard. Before manually updating the dashboard, we confirm the case numbers with regional and local health departments, including the respective centres for disease control and prevention (CDC) of China, Taiwan, and Europe, the Hong Kong Department of Health, the Macau Government, and WHO, as well as city-level and state-level health authorities. For city-level case reports in the USA, Australia, and Canada, which we began reporting on Feb 1, we rely on the US CDC, the government of Canada, the Australian Government Department of Health, and various state or territory health authorities. All manual updates (for countries and regions outside mainland China) are coordinated by a team at Johns Hopkins University. The case data reported on the dashboard aligns with the daily Chinese CDC 3 and WHO situation reports 2 for within and outside of mainland China, respectively (figure ). Furthermore, the dashboard is particularly effective at capturing the timing of the first reported case of COVID-19 in new countries or regions (appendix). With the exception of Australia, Hong Kong, and Italy, the CSSE at Johns Hopkins University has reported newly infected countries ahead of WHO, with Hong Kong and Italy reported within hours of the corresponding WHO situation report. Figure Comparison of COVID-19 case reporting from different sources Daily cumulative case numbers (starting Jan 22, 2020) reported by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE), WHO situation reports, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese CDC) for within (A) and outside (B) mainland China. Given the popularity and impact of the dashboard to date, we plan to continue hosting and managing the tool throughout the entirety of the COVID-19 outbreak and to build out its capabilities to establish a standing tool to monitor and report on future outbreaks. We believe our efforts are crucial to help inform modelling efforts and control measures during the earliest stages of the outbreak.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Post-intensive Care Syndrome: an Overview.

            Survival of critically unwell patients has improved in the last decade due to advances in critical care medicine. Some of these survivors develop cognitive, psychiatric and /or physical disability after treatment in intensive care unit (ICU), which is now recognized as post intensive care syndrome (PICS). Given the limited awareness about PICS in the medical faculty this aspect is often overlooked which may lead to reduced quality of life and cause a lot of suffering of these patients and their families. Efforts should be directed towards preventing PICS by minimizing sedation and early mobilization during ICU.All critical care survivors should be evaluated for PICS and those having signs and symptoms of it should be managed by a multidisciplinary team which includes critical care physician, neuro-psychiatrist, physiotherapist and respiratory therapist, with the use of pharmacological and non-apharmacological interventions. This can be achieved through an organizational change and improvement, knowing the high rate of incidence of PICS and its adverse effects on the survivor's life and daily activities and its effect on the survivor's family.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Applying a Family Resilience Framework in Training, Practice, and Research: Mastering the Art of the Possible.

              With growing interest in systemic views of human resilience, this article updates and clarifies our understanding of the concept of resilience as involving multilevel dynamic processes over time. Family resilience refers to the functioning of the family system in dealing with adversity: Assessment and intervention focus on the family impact of stressful life challenges and the family processes that foster positive adaptation for the family unit and all members. The application of a family resilience framework is discussed and illustrated in clinical and community-based training and practice. Use of the author's research-informed map of core processes in family resilience is briefly noted, highlighting the recursive and synergistic influences of transactional processes within families and with their social environment. Given the inherently contextual nature of the construct of resilience, varied process elements may be more or less useful, depending on different adverse situations over time, with a major crisis; disruptive transitions; or chronic multistress conditions. This perspective is attuned to the diversity of family cultures and structures, their resources and constraints, socio-cultural and developmental influences, and the viability of varied pathways in resilience.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Fam Nurs
                J Fam Nurs
                JFN
                spjfn
                Journal of Family Nursing
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                1074-8407
                1552-549X
                19 May 2020
                May 2020
                : 26
                : 2
                : 87-89
                Article
                10.1177_1074840720920883
                10.1177/1074840720920883
                7265214
                32427038
                d4a8c954-0815-44de-a4da-b29b6777eece
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Guest Editorial
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                Comments

                Comment on this article