6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Impact of Vaccination and Prior Exposure on Stool Shedding of Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi in 6 Controlled Human Infection Studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Six Salmonella Typhi or Paratyphi human challenge studies were conducted, and daily stool cultures performed. Vi-containing vaccines reduced bacterial shedding, Ty21a or an experimental vaccine did not. Higher Vi immunoglobulin G titers were associated with reduced shedding.

          Abstract

          Background

          Shedding of Salmonella Typhi or Paratyphi in the stool or urine leads to contamination of food or water, which is a prerequisite for transmission of enteric fever. Currently, there are limited data on the effect of vaccination or prior exposure on stool shedding.

          Methods

          Six Salmonella Typhi or Paratyphi human challenge studies were conducted between 2011 and 2017. Participants were either unvaccinated or vaccinated with 1 of 4 vaccines: Vi-polysaccharide (Vi-PS), Vi-tetanus-toxoid conjugate vaccine (Vi-TT), live oral Ty21a vaccine, or an experimental vaccine (M01ZH09). Daily stool cultures were collected for 14 days after challenge.

          Results

          There were 4934 stool samples collected from 430 volunteers. Participants who received Vi-PS or Vi-TT shed less than unvaccinated participants (odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.77; P = .010 and OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19–0.91, P = .029 for Vi-PS and Vi-TT, respectively). Higher anti-Vi immunoglobulin G titers were associated with less shedding of S. Typhi ( P < .0001). A nonsignificant reduction in shedding was associated with Ty21a vaccine (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.27–1.20; P = .140). Individuals previously exposed to S. Typhi shed less than previously unexposed individuals (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.1–0.8; P = .016). Shedding of S. Typhi was more common than S. Paratyphi.

          Conclusions

          Prior vaccination with Vi vaccines, or natural infection, reduces onward transmission of S. Typhi. Field trials of Vi-TT should be designed to detect indirect protection, reflecting the consequence of reduced stool shedding observed in the human challenge model.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          High-avidity IgA protects the intestine by enchaining growing bacteria

          Vaccine-induced high-avidity IgA can protect against bacterial enteropathogens by directly neutralizing virulence factors or by poorly defined mechanisms that physically impede bacterial interactions with the gut tissues (‘immune exclusion’). IgA-mediated cross-linking clumps bacteria in the gut lumen and is critical for protection against infection by non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium). However, classical agglutination, which was thought to drive this process, is efficient only at high pathogen densities (≥108 non-motile bacteria per gram). In typical infections, much lower densities (100–107 colony-forming units per gram) of rapidly dividing bacteria are present in the gut lumen. Here we show that a different physical process drives formation of clumps in vivo: IgA-mediated cross-linking enchains daughter cells, preventing their separation after division, and clumping is therefore dependent on growth. Enchained growth is effective at all realistic pathogen densities, and accelerates pathogen clearance from the gut lumen. Furthermore, IgA enchains plasmid-donor and -recipient clones into separate clumps, impeding conjugative plasmid transfer in vivo. Enchained growth is therefore a mechanism by which IgA can disarm and clear potentially invasive species from the intestinal lumen without requiring high pathogen densities, inflammation or bacterial killing. Furthermore, our results reveal an untapped potential for oral vaccines in combating the spread of antimicrobial resistance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Typhoid fever and paratyphoid fever: Systematic review to estimate global morbidity and mortality for 2010

            Background Typhoid and paratyphoid fever remain important causes of morbidity worldwide. Accurate disease burden estimates are needed to guide policy decisions and prevention and control strategies. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review of the PubMed and Scopus databases using pre-defined criteria to identify population-based studies with typhoid fever incidence data published between 1980 and 2009. We also abstracted data from annual reports of notifiable diseases in countries with advanced surveillance systems. Typhoid and paratyphoid fever input data were grouped into regions and regional incidence and mortality rates were estimated. Incidence data were extrapolated across regions for those lacking data. Age-specific incidence rates were derived for regions where age-specific data were available. Crude and adjusted estimates of the global typhoid fever burden were calculated. Results Twenty-five studies were identified, all of which contained incidence data on typhoid fever and 12 on paratyphoid fever. Five advanced surveillance systems contributed data on typhoid fever; 2 on paratyphoid fever. Regional typhoid fever incidence rates ranged from <0.1/100 000 cases/y in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia to 724.6/100 000 cases/y in Sub-Saharan Africa. Regional paratyphoid incidence rates ranged from 0.8/100 000 cases/y in North Africa/Middle East to 77.4/100 000 cases/y in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The estimated total number of typhoid fever episodes in 2010 was 13.5 million (interquartile range 9.1–17.8 million). The adjusted estimate accounting for the low sensitivity of blood cultures for isolation of the bacteria was 26.9 million (interquartile range 18.3–35.7 million) episodes. These findings are comparable to the most recent analysis of global typhoid fever morbidity, which reported crude and adjusted estimates of 10.8 million and 21.7 million typhoid fever episodes globally in 2000. Conclusion Typhoid fever remains a significant health burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Despite the availability of more recent data on both enteric fevers, additional research is needed in many regions, particularly Africa, Latin America and other developing countries.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of Vi typhoid vaccine in India.

              Typhoid fever remains an important cause of illness and death in the developing world. Uncertainties about the protective effect of Vi polysaccharide vaccine in children under the age of 5 years and about the vaccine's effect under programmatic conditions have inhibited its use in developing countries. We conducted a phase 4 effectiveness trial in which slum-dwelling residents of Kolkata, India, who were 2 years of age or older were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of either Vi vaccine or inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, according to geographic clusters, with 40 clusters in each study group. The subjects were then followed for 2 years. A total of 37,673 subjects received a dose of a study vaccine. The mean rate of vaccine coverage was 61% for the Vi vaccine clusters and 60% for the hepatitis A vaccine clusters. Typhoid fever was diagnosed in 96 subjects in the hepatitis A vaccine group, as compared with 34 in the Vi vaccine group, with no subject having more than one episode. The level of protective effectiveness for the Vi vaccine was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41 to 75; P<0.001 for the comparison with the hepatitis A vaccine group). Children who were vaccinated between the ages of 2 and 5 years had a level of protection of 80% (95% CI, 53 to 91). Among unvaccinated members of the Vi vaccine clusters, the level of protection was 44% (95% CI, 2 to 69). The overall level of protection among all residents of Vi vaccine clusters was 57% (95% CI, 37 to 71). No serious adverse events that were attributed to either vaccine were observed during the month after vaccination. The Vi vaccine was effective in young children and protected unvaccinated neighbors of Vi vaccinees. The potential for combined direct and indirect protection by Vi vaccine should be considered in future deliberations about introducing this vaccine in areas where typhoid fever is endemic. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00125008.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Infect Dis
                Clin. Infect. Dis
                cid
                Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1058-4838
                1537-6591
                15 April 2019
                25 September 2018
                25 September 2018
                : 68
                : 8
                : 1265-1273
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford
                [2 ]Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Oxford University Hospitals, National Health Service Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Medical Research Council Human Immunology Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
                [6 ]Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre
                [7 ]Institute for Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [8 ]Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
                [9 ]Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
                [10 ]Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
                [11 ]Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield
                [12 ]National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                M. M. G. and M. V. contributed equally to this manuscript.

                Correspondence: M. Voysey, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK ( merryn.voysey@ 123456phc.ox.ac.uk ).
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6324-6559
                Article
                ciy670
                10.1093/cid/ciy670
                6452003
                30252031
                d4dcf0b9-e516-4ed8-a225-0316e4f288f2
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 June 2018
                : 07 August 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research 10.13039/501100000272
                Award ID: DRF-2015-08-048
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust Strategic Translational Award
                Award ID: 092661
                Funded by: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 10.13039/100000865
                Award ID: OPP1084259
                Award ID: OPP1126235
                Award ID: OPP1116967
                Award ID: OPP1151153
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust 10.13039/100010269
                Award ID: 106158/Z/14/Z
                Categories
                Articles and Commentaries

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                stool shedding,salmonella typhi,indirect effects,typhoid conjugate vaccine,vi-polysaccharide vaccine

                Comments

                Comment on this article