43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      Environment and Society is a collaborative, international project intent on foregrounding and rethinking the interactions of environments and societies from multidisciplinary and global perspectives. 
      Learn more about the Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society or subscribe to White Horse Press' OA package Subscribe to Open - The White Horse Press
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stakeholders’ Perceptions of the Linkage Between Reproductive Rights and Environmental Sustainability

      The Journal of Population and Sustainability
      White Horse Press

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The fulfilment of reproductive health and rights may have a synergistic relationship to environmental sustainability because it leads to lower fertility levels. With this in mind, and with the objective of increasing the legitimacy, funding and acceptance of reproductive health and rights, I conducted a mixed-methods qualitative study consisting of an online survey followed by in-depth interviews. I reached out to two groups of participants: stakeholders of the reproductive health and rights movement, and stakeholders of the environmental sustainability movement. I explored how stakeholders perceived the linkages between family planning, population growth and environmental sustainability. Results indicate that these stakeholders overwhelmingly support the integration of the reproductive health and rights ideological framework in a wider sustainability frame reflecting environmental considerations. I identified three barriers to both addressing and implementing the linkage: responsibility allocation injustice, colonialism and discrimination, and marginalisation. Environmental sustainability and reproductive health and rights stakeholders appear in favour of applying what could be considered ‘environmental mainstreaming’ to the reproductive health and rights field. Environmental sustainability stakeholders were more likely than reproductive health and rights stakeholders, who were more divided on this issue, to endorse the linkage and related concepts.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The Journal of Population and Sustainability
          JP&S
          White Horse Press
          2398-5496
          2398-5488
          November 04 2021
          December 14 2021
          Article
          10.3197/JPS.63772236595233
          d4e2b20e-2d7f-461a-8b27-9724951549cf
          © 2021

          https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          Related Documents Log