36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlight

          • A systematic review and meta-analysis was used to investigate whether procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia.

          • The review confirms dyslexia is associated with a procedural learning impairment.

          • Differences in study findings may reflect compensatory mechanisms associated with the declarative memory system.

          Abstract

          A number of studies have investigated procedural learning in dyslexia using serial reaction time (SRT) tasks. Overall, the results have been mixed, with evidence of both impaired and intact learning reported. We undertook a systematic search of studies that examined procedural learning using SRT tasks, and synthesized the data using meta-analysis. A total of 14 studies were identified, representing data from 314 individuals with dyslexia and 317 typically developing control participants. The results indicate that, on average, individuals with dyslexia have worse procedural learning abilities than controls, as indexed by sequence learning on the SRT task. The average weighted standardized mean difference (the effect size) was found to be 0.449 (CI 95: .204, .693), and was significant ( p < .001). However, moderate levels of heterogeneity were found between study-level effect sizes. Meta-regression analyses indicated that studies with older participants that used SRT tasks with second order conditional sequences, or with older participants that used sequences that were presented a large number of times, were associated with smaller effect sizes. These associations are discussed with respect to compensatory and delayed memory systems in dyslexia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Episodic and declarative memory: role of the hippocampus.

          The fact that medial temporal lobe structures, including the hippocampus, are critical for declarative memory is firmly established by now. The understanding of the role that these structures play in declarative memory, however, despite great efforts spent in the quest, has eluded investigators so far. Given the existing scenario, novel ideas that hold the promise of clarifying matters should be eagerly sought. One such idea was recently proposed by Vargha-Khadem and her colleagues (Science 1997; 277:376-380) on the basis of their study of three young people suffering from anterograde amnesia caused by early-onset hippocampal pathology. The idea is that the hippocampus is necessary for remembering ongoing life's experiences (episodic memory), but not necessary for the acquisition of factual knowledge (semantic memory). We discuss the reasons why this novel proposal makes good sense and why it and its ramifications should be vigorously pursued. We review and compare declarative and episodic theories of amnesia, and argue that the findings reported by Vargha-Khadem and her colleagues fit well into an episodic theory that retains components already publicized, and adds new ones suggested by the Vargha-Khadem et al. study. Existing components of this theory include the idea that acquisition of factual knowledge can occur independently of episodic memory, and the idea that in anterograde amnesia it is quite possible for episodic memory to be more severely impaired than semantic memory. We suggest a realignment of organization of memory such that declarative memory is defined in terms of features and properties that are common to both episodic and semantic memory. The organization of memory thus modified gives greater precision to the Vargha-Khadem et al. neuroanatomical model in which declarative memory depends on perihippocampal cortical regions but not on the hippocampus, whereas episodic memory, which is separate from declarative memory, depends on the hippocampus.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop.

            This paper reviews some of the recent findings on different aspects of the anatomical organization of the basal ganglia. Attempts have been made to delineate the anatomical substrate of information processing along the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop. Emphasis has been placed on data obtained with highly sensitive anterograde tract-tracing methods applied to the study of the main axis of the loop, which is composed of the striatum, the pallidum, and the substantia nigra. These findings have highlighted the complexities of the organization of the intrinsic basal ganglia circuitry, which comprises multiple modular units that are distributed according to highly ordered and repetitive patterns. Such an arrangement is well suited to convey cortical information in a highly specific manner throughout the basal ganglia. The basal ganglia circuitry is also designed so as to modulate in a precise manner the neuronal activity of several brain functional systems, which are involved in the direct control of different aspects of psychomotor behavior. Of utmost importance is the action of the basal ganglia on thalamocortical premotor neurons. It is through these neurons, which can be considered as a sort of final common pathway, that the basal ganglia ultimately influence the complex neuronal computation that goes on at cortical level.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia.

              Developmental dyslexics often complain that small letters appear to blur and move around when they are trying to read. Anatomical, electrophysiological, psychophysical and brain-imaging studies have all contributed to elucidating the functional organization of these and other visual confusions. They emerge not from damage to a single visual relay but from abnormalities of the magnocellular component of the visual system, which is specialized for processing fast temporal information. The m-stream culminates in the posterior parietal cortex, which plays an important role in guiding visual attention. The evidence is consistent with an increasingly sophisticated account of dyslexia that does not single out either phonological, or visual or motor deficits. Rather, temporal processing in all three systems seems to be impaired. Dyslexics may be unable to process fast incoming sensory information adequately in any domain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Res Dev Disabil
                Res Dev Disabil
                Research in Developmental Disabilities
                Pergamon Press
                0891-4222
                1873-3379
                1 October 2013
                October 2013
                : 34
                : 10
                : 3460-3476
                Affiliations
                [a ]Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
                [b ]Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States
                [c ]The University of Manchester, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Tel.: +61 3 9244 6858. jarrad.lum@ 123456deakin.edu.au
                Article
                S0891-4222(13)00310-7
                10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017
                3784964
                23920029
                d4fe8a04-18f6-4265-b126-1167e96be192
                © 2013 The Authors

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 9 April 2013
                : 4 July 2013
                : 9 July 2013
                Categories
                Review Article

                Neurology
                dyslexia,serial reaction time,procedural learning,implicit learning,meta-analysis,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article