1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Sex With the Global Burden of Cataract

      1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1
      JAMA Ophthalmology
      American Medical Association (AMA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d4179137e292">This comparative burden-of-disease study investigates the association of sex with the global burden of cataract by year, age, and socioeconomic status in the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. </p><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170115-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4179137e298">Question</h5> <p id="d4179137e300">What is the association of sex with the global burden of cataract by year, age, and socioeconomic status? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170115-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4179137e303">Findings</h5> <p id="d4179137e305">In this international, comparative burden-of-disease study, differences in the global burden of cataract by sex persisted from 1990 through 2015, with women having higher rates of cataract than men. Older age and lower socioeconomic status were associated with greater differences in cataract rates by sex. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170115-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4179137e308">Meaning</h5> <p id="d4179137e310">These findings suggest that health policy should be sensitive to sex when addressing global vision loss caused by cataract. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170115-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4179137e314">Importance</h5> <p id="d4179137e316">Eye disease burden could help guide health policy making. Differences in cataract burden by sex is a major concern of reducing avoidable blindness caused by cataract. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170115-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4179137e319">Objective</h5> <p id="d4179137e321">To investigate the association of sex with the global burden of cataract by year, age, and socioeconomic status using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170115-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4179137e324">Design, Setting, and Participants</h5> <p id="d4179137e326">This international, comparative burden-of-disease study extracted the global, regional, and national sex-specific DALY numbers, crude DALY rates, and age-standardized DALY rates caused by cataract by year and age from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The DALY data were collected from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2015, for ever 5 years. The human development index (HDI) in 2015 was extracted as an indicator of national socioeconomic status from the Human Development Report. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170115-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4179137e329">Main Outcomes and Measures</h5> <p id="d4179137e331">Comparisons of sex-specific DALY estimates due to cataract by year, age, and socioeconomic status at the global level. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank test, Pearson correlation, and linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the socioeconomic-associated sex differences in cataract burden. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170115-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4179137e334">Results</h5> <p id="d4179137e336">Differences in rates of cataract by sex were similar between 1990 and 2015, with age-standardized DALY rates of 54.5 among men vs 65.0 among women in 1990 and 52.3 among men vs 67.0 among women in 2015. Women had higher rates than men of the same age, and sexual differences increased with age. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed that age-standardized DALY rates among women were higher than those among men for each HDI-based country group ( <i>z</i> range, −4.236 to −6.093; <i>P</i> &lt; .001). The difference (female minus male) in age-standardized DALY rates ( <i>r</i> = −0.610 [ <i>P</i> &lt; .001]; standardized β = −0.610 [ <i>P</i> &lt; .001]) and the female to male age-standardized DALY rate ratios ( <i>r</i> = −0.180 [ <i>P</i> = .02]; standardized β = −0.180 [ <i>P</i> = .02]) were inversely correlated with HDI. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170115-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4179137e364">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d4179137e366">Although global cataract health care is progressing, sexual differences in cataract burden showed little improvement in the past few decades. Worldwide, women have a higher cataract burden than men. Older age and lower socioeconomic status are associated with greater differences in rates of cataract by sex. Our findings may enhance public awareness of sexual differences in global cataract burden and emphasize the importance of making sex-sensitive health policy to manage global vision loss caused by cataract. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA Ophthalmology
          JAMA Ophthalmol
          American Medical Association (AMA)
          2168-6165
          February 01 2018
          February 01 2018
          : 136
          : 2
          : 116
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
          Article
          10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.5668
          5838943
          29242928
          d54022f3-d8c8-4581-a1f9-ce7d0602a681
          © 2018
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article