13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What flowers do we like? The influence of shape and color on the rating of flower beauty

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is no doubt that people find flowers beautiful. Surprisingly, we know very little about the actual properties which make flowers so appealing to humans. Although the evolutionary aesthetics provides some theories concerning generally preferred flower traits, empirical evidence is largely missing. In this study, we used an online survey in which residents of the Czech Republic ( n = 2006) rated the perceived beauty of 52 flower stimuli of diverse shapes and colors. Colored flowers were preferred over their uncolored versions. When controlling for flower shape, we found an unequal preference for different flower colors, blue being the most and yellow the least preferred. In the overall assessment of beauty, shape was more important than color. Prototypical flowers, i.e., radially symmetrical flowers with low complexity, were rated as the most beautiful. We also found a positive effect of sharp flower contours and blue color on the overall rating of flower beauty. The results may serve as a basis for further studies in some areas of the people-plant interaction research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          View through a window may influence recovery from surgery.

          R. Ulrich (1984)
          Records on recovery after cholecystectomy of patients in a suburban Pennsylvania hospital between 1972 and 1981 were examined to determine whether assignment to a room with a window view of a natural setting might have restorative influences. Twenty-three surgical patients assigned to rooms with windows looking out on a natural scene had shorter postoperative hospital stays, received fewer negative evaluative comments in nurses' notes, and took fewer potent analgesics than 23 matched patients in similar rooms with windows facing a brick building wall.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An ecological valence theory of human color preference.

              Color preference is an important aspect of visual experience, but little is known about why people in general like some colors more than others. Previous research suggested explanations based on biological adaptations [Hurlbert AC, Ling YL (2007) Curr Biol 17:623-625] and color-emotions [Ou L-C, Luo MR, Woodcock A, Wright A (2004) Color Res Appl 29:381-389]. In this article we articulate an ecological valence theory in which color preferences arise from people's average affective responses to color-associated objects. An empirical test provides strong support for this theory: People like colors strongly associated with objects they like (e.g., blues with clear skies and clean water) and dislike colors strongly associated with objects they dislike (e.g., browns with feces and rotten food). Relative to alternative theories, the ecological valence theory both fits the data better (even with fewer free parameters) and provides a more plausible, comprehensive causal explanation of color preferences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                peerj
                peerj
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Francisco, USA )
                2167-8359
                7 June 2016
                2016
                : 4
                : e2106
                Affiliations
                [-1]Department of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
                Article
                2106
                10.7717/peerj.2106
                4906640
                27330863
                d5427631-85fe-4f70-afe5-3afef2ced230
                ©2016 Hůla and Flegr

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 16 February 2016
                : 14 May 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: Grant Agency of the Charles University in Prague
                Award ID: 388315
                The research was supported by the Grant Agency of the Charles University in Prague (project no: 388315). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Psychiatry and Psychology

                people-plant interactions,beauty,aesthetic preference,floral morphology,evolutionary aesthetics,phytophilia

                Comments

                Comment on this article