25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A Multiple Streams analysis of the decisions to fund gender-neutral HPV vaccination in Canada.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In Canada, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is licensed and recommended for females and males. Although all Canadian jurisdictions fund school-based HPV vaccine programs for girls, only six jurisdictions fund school-based HPV vaccination for boys. The research aimed to analyze the factors that underpin government decisions to fund HPV vaccine for boys using a theoretical policy model, Kingdon's Multiple Streams framework. This approach assesses policy development by examining three concurrent, but independent, streams that guide analysis: Problem Stream, Policy Stream, and Politics Stream. Analysis from the Problem Stream highlights that males are affected by HPV-related diseases and are involved in transmitting HPV infection to their sexual partners. Policy Stream analysis makes clear that while the inclusion of males in HPV vaccine programs is suitable, equitable, and acceptable; there is debate regarding cost-effectiveness. Politics Stream analysis identifies the perspectives of six different stakeholder groups and highlights the contribution of government officials at the provincial and territorial level. Kingdon's Multiple Streams framework helps clarify the opportunities and barriers for HPV vaccine policy change. This analysis identified that the interpretation of cost-effectiveness models and advocacy of stakeholders such as citizen-advocates and HPV-affected politicians have been particularly important in galvanizing policy change.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Prev Med
          Preventive medicine
          Elsevier BV
          1096-0260
          0091-7435
          Jul 2017
          : 100
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal H3A 1B1, Quebec, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Côte St-Catherine Road, Montreal H3T 1E4, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: gilla.shapiro@mail.mcgill.ca.
          [2 ] Department of Community Health Sciences, 3280 Hospital Drive, Calgary T2N 4N1, Alberta, Canada.
          [3 ] School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
          [4 ] Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal H3A 1B1, Quebec, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Côte St-Catherine Road, Montreal H3T 1E4, Quebec, Canada.
          [5 ] Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal H3A 1B1, Quebec, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Côte St-Catherine Road, Montreal H3T 1E4, Quebec, Canada; Louise Granofsky Psychosocial Oncology Program, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Côte St-Catherine Road, Montreal H3T 1E4, Quebec, Canada; Departments of Psychiatry and Oncology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal H3A 1B1, Quebec, Canada.
          Article
          S0091-7435(17)30137-8
          10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.016
          28435081
          d568bcf8-ae20-4a0c-b07e-69b738b451a8
          History

          Canada,Cancer prevention,Health policy,Human papillomavirus,Kingdon Multiple Streams framework,Men's health,Policy analysis,Vaccination,Vaccine policy

          Comments

          Comment on this article