0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Experience from the German Pegvisomant Observational Study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:The German Pegvisomant Observational Study (GPOS) was created immediately after marketing authorisation was received in Germany for Somavert®(pegvisomant) for the treatment of patients with acromegaly. In August 2006, the database underwent its fifth interim analysis of 263 patients, the vast majority of whom previously had insufficient disease control with other treatment modalities. The GPOS documents both safety and efficacy aspects of the treatment of patients with acromegaly by the first growth hormone-receptor antagonist, pegvisomant. This treatment led to normalization of disease activity in most patients, had favourable effects on glucose metabolism and improved signs and symptoms of the disorder. The safety profile indicates that pegvisomant treatment is well tolerated, and tumour growth is noted to occur at the same rate as for somatostatin analogue treatment. Transaminase elevations occurred in 16 of the 263 patients but spontaneously resolved in eight of them and promptly normalised in five patients who discontinued treatment. GPOS is presently the largest database of pegvisomant-treated patients, and it comprises more than 87% of all patients treated with pegvisomant in Germany. Conclusions: The GPOS database provides important information about treatment modalities, safety and efficacy of pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Treatment of acromegaly with the growth hormone-receptor antagonist pegvisomant.

          Patients with acromegaly are currently treated with surgery, radiation therapy, and drugs to reduce hypersecretion of growth hormone, but the treatments may be ineffective and have adverse effects. Pegvisomant is a genetically engineered growth hormone-receptor antagonist that blocks the action of growth hormone. We conducted a 12-week, randomized, double-blind study of three daily doses of pegvisomant (10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg) and placebo, given subcutaneously, in 112 patients with acromegaly. The mean (+/-SD) serum concentration of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) decreased from base line by 4.0+/-16.8 percent in the placebo group, 26.7+/-27.9 percent in the group that received 10 mg of pegvisomant per day, 50.1+/-26.7 percent in the group that received 15 mg of pegvisomant per day, and 62.5+/-21.3 percent in the group that received 20 mg of pegvisomant per day (P<0.001 for the comparison of each pegvisomant group with placebo), and the concentrations became normal in 10 percent, 54 percent, 81 percent, and 89 percent of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for each comparison with placebo). Among patients treated with 15 mg or 20 mg of pegvisomant per day, there were significant decreases in ring size, soft-tissue swelling, the degree of excessive perspiration, and fatigue. The score fortotal symptoms and signs of acromegaly decreased significantly in all groups receiving pegvisomant (P< or =0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar in all groups. On the basis of these preliminary results, treatment of patients who have acromegaly with a growth hormone-receptor antagonist results in a reduction in serum IGF-I concentrations and in clinical improvement.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reference ranges for two automated chemiluminescent assays for serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3).

            Assays for insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) have become essential tools in the diagnostic work-up of disorders of the somatotropic axis in children and adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the automated IMMULITE IGF-I and IGFBP-3 assays and to establish reference limits--central 95% intervals, median, 0.1 and other centiles as clinically relevant--as a function of age from 797 females and 787 males, from the first week of life through the ninth decade. Pubertal children were classified by sex and by sexual maturation (Tanner stage). IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were also assayed in 20 pediatric patients each with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and Turner syndrome (UTS), before and during 12 months of recombinant growth hormone (rhGH) therapy, as well as in 11 adult patients with GHD and seven with acromegaly before therapy. Both the IGF-I and IGFBP-3 assays were accurate, specific and sufficiently sensitive to measure IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in serum with good linearity and recovery. In the IGF-I assay, potential interference from IGFBPs was eliminated by blocking with excess IGF-II. Circulating IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations, and their ratio IGF-I/IGFBP-3, were age-dependent, showing low levels immediately after birth, a typical pubertal peak for girls and boys, and a pronounced decline after puberty, reaching a plateau in early adulthood. In adults IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels decreased smoothly but steadily with age. Children with GHD and UTS had low circulating IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels which increased to normal reference limits under therapy with rhGH. Adult GHD patients showed IGF-I levels below the age-related median; untreated acromegalic patients mostly had IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels above the age-related 97.5th centile. In conclusion, the automated IMMULITE IGF-I and IGFBP-3 assays are reliable tools in the diagnosis of pathologies of the GH/IGF axis and in the follow-up of their therapies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Treatment of acromegaly with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in clinical practice: safety and efficacy evaluation from the German Pegvisomant Observational Study.

              The GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant is a highly effective new treatment option in acromegaly. The German Pegvisomant Observational Study (GPOS) was started to monitor long-term safety and efficacy of pegvisomant as prescribed in clinical practice. GPOS is an observational, multi-center, surveillance study, which comprises non-interventional data collection. Of the 229 patients included in the study, 90.4% had previous pituitary surgery, 43.2% were treated by radiation therapy, and 94.3% had previous medical therapy for acromegaly that had been discontinued mainly due to persistent IGF-I elevation or side effects. The intention-to-treat population included 177 patients with at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. IGF-I levels decreased from 1.75+/-0.91-fold the upper limit of normal at baseline to 1.05+/- 0.62 at the 6-month visit, 0.96+/-0.60 at the 12-month visit, and to 0.89+/-0.41-fold after 24 months (P 1% were injection site reactions in 7.4%, elevated liver enzymes (>3 times of normal) in 5.2% (3.1% spontaneously normalized during continued treatment), reported increase of pituitary tumor volume in 5.2% (which was verified in 3.1%), and headache in 1.7%. Pegvisomant is generally well tolerated with a safety profile similar to that reported in clinical trials and can effectively reduce IGF-I in patients with acromegaly refractory to conventional therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                HRE
                Horm Res Paediatr
                10.1159/issn.1663-2818
                Hormone Research in Paediatrics
                S. Karger AG
                978-3-8055-8475-3
                978-3-8055-8476-0
                1663-2818
                1663-2826
                2007
                December 2007
                10 December 2007
                : 68
                : Suppl 5
                : 70-73
                Affiliations
                aDivision of Clinical Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Campus Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, bDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, cEndocrinologist, Oldenburg, dDepartment of Endocrinology, University of Essen, Essen, eDepartment of Endocrinology, Max-Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, and fPfizer Ltd., Endocrine Care, Nuremberg, Germany
                Article
                110481 Horm Res 2007;68:70–73
                10.1159/000110481
                18174713
                © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 1, References: 7, Pages: 4
                Categories
                Acrostudy Symposium

                Comments

                Comment on this article