28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Randomized phase III KEYNOTE-045 trial of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine in recurrent advanced urothelial cancer: results of >2 years of follow-up

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Novel second-line treatments are needed for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC). Interim analysis of the phase III KEYNOTE-045 study showed a superior overall survival (OS) benefit of pembrolizumab, a programmed death 1 inhibitor, versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced UC that progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy. Here we report the long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of KEYNOTE-045.

          Patients and methods

          Adult patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed UC whose disease progressed after first-line, platinum-containing chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive pembrolizumab [200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W)] or investigator’s choice of paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2 Q3W), docetaxel (75 mg/m 2 Q3W), or vinflunine (320 mg/m 2 Q3W). Primary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central radiology review (BICR). A key secondary end point was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by BICR.

          Results

          A total of 542 patients were enrolled (pembrolizumab, n = 270; chemotherapy, n = 272). Median follow-up as of 26 October 2017 was 27.7 months. Median 1- and 2-year OS rates were higher with pembrolizumab (44.2% and 26.9%, respectively) than chemotherapy (29.8% and 14.3%, respectively). PFS rates did not differ between treatment arms; however, 1- and 2-year PFS rates were higher with pembrolizumab. The objective response rate was also higher with pembrolizumab (21.1% versus 11.0%). Median duration of response to pembrolizumab was not reached (range 1.6+ to 30.0+ months) versus chemotherapy (4.4 months; range 1.4+ to 29.9+ months). Pembrolizumab had lower rates of any grade (62.0% versus 90.6%) and grade ≥3 (16.5% versus 50.2%) treatment-related adverse events than chemotherapy.

          Conclusions

          Long-term results (>2 years’ follow-up) were consistent with those of previously reported analyses, demonstrating continued clinical benefit of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy for efficacy and safety for treatment of locally advanced/metastatic, platinum-refractory UC.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02256436.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and activity of pembrolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (KEYNOTE-012): a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study.

          PD-1 and its ligands are expressed in urothelial cancer, and findings have shown that inhibition of the PD-1 pathway has clinical benefit. We aimed to assess the safety and activity of an anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Health-Related Quality-of-Life Analysis From KEYNOTE-045: A Phase III Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy for Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Cancer.

            Purpose In the phase III KEYNOTE-045 study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02256436), pembrolizumab significantly prolonged overall survival compared with investigator's choice of chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer. Here, we report the results of health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) analyses from the KEYNOTE-045 trial. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or investigator's choice of docetaxel 75 mg/m2, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, or vinflunine 320 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Key prespecified HRQoL analyses were time to deterioration (TTD) and mean change from baseline to week 15 in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 global health status/quality-of-life score. Results Of 542 patients who were randomly assigned, 519 were included in HRQoL analyses (pembrolizumab, n = 266; chemotherapy, n = 253). HRQoL compliance was > 95% at baseline and approximately 88% at week 15 for both groups. Pembrolizumab prolonged TTD in global health status/quality-of-life score compared with chemotherapy (median, 3.5 months v 2.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.72; nominal one-sided P = .004). Mean (95% CI) change from baseline to week 15 in global health status/quality-of-life score was 0.69 (-2.40 to 3.77) with pembrolizumab and -8.36 (-11.84 to -4.89) with chemotherapy (mean difference, 9.05 points; 95% CI, 4.61 to 13.50; nominal two-sided P < .001). Conclusion Pembrolizumab prolonged TTD in HRQoL compared with chemotherapy. Patients who were treated with pembrolizumab had stable or improved global health status/quality of life, whereas those who were treated with investigator's choice of chemotherapy experienced declines in global health status/quality of life. Combined with efficacy and safety outcomes, these data support pembrolizumab as standard of care for patients with platinum-refractory advanced urothelial cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Second-line Advanced Bladder Cancer

              Immune-modulating drugs have recently been introduced to the second-line setting of advanced bladder cancer. Pembrolizumab increases overall survival and is associated with less toxicity compared with chemotherapy in this setting based on the Keynote 045 study. The high cost of immunotherapy necessitates an assessment of its value by considering both efficacy and cost.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Oncol
                Ann. Oncol
                annonc
                Annals of Oncology
                Oxford University Press
                0923-7534
                1569-8041
                June 2019
                03 May 2019
                03 May 2019
                : 30
                : 6 , The role of plasma microseminoprotein-beta in prostate cancer
                : 970-976
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Surgery/Urology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Medical Oncology, PSMAR-IMIM Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain and Harvard Medical School University, Boston, USA
                [3 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
                [4 ]Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [5 ]Department of Medicine and Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
                [6 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA
                [7 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
                [8 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale University, New Haven
                [9 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
                [10 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
                [11 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [12 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital and Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [13 ]Department of Medical Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, USA
                [14 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
                [15 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian, New York
                [16 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, USA
                [17 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [18 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr Yves Fradet, Department of Surgery/Urology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 10 McMahon Street, Québec City, QC G1L 3L5, Canada. Tel: +1-418-525-4444; E-mail: yves.fradet@ 123456crchudequebec.ulaval.ca
                Article
                mdz127
                10.1093/annonc/mdz127
                6594457
                31050707
                d5afa3cf-8714-4dd1-abf0-52036003941d
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                Funded by: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 10.13039/100009947
                Funded by: Merck & Co.
                Funded by: Inc.
                Funded by: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 10.13039/100009947
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Urogenital Tumors
                Editor's Choice

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                pd-l1,pd-1,pembrolizumab,urothelial cancer
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                pd-l1, pd-1, pembrolizumab, urothelial cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article