68
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Plasmodium vivax Recurrence Following Falciparum and Mixed Species Malaria: Risk Factors and Effect of Antimalarial Kinetics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          On the Thai-Myanmar border, Plasmodium vivax is the most common cause of parasitological failure following treatment for acute falciparum malaria. Slowly eliminated antimalarials significantly reduce the risk of early recurrence.

          Abstract

          (See editorial commentary by Baird, on pages [Related article:]621–623.)

          Background. Plasmodium vivax malaria commonly follows treatment of falciparum malaria in regions of co-endemicity. This is an important cause of preventable morbidity.

          Methods. We examined the factors contributing to the risk of recurrence of P. vivax infection after treatment of acute falciparum malaria in a series of clinical trials conducted on the Thai-Myanmar border from 1991 through 2005.

          Results. Overall, 10,549 patients (4960 children aged <15 years and 5589 adults) were treated for falciparum malaria; of these patients, 9385 (89.0%) had Plasmodium falciparum monoinfection and 1164 (11.0%) had mixed P. falciparum/P. vivax infections according to microscopic examinations performed at screening. The cumulative proportion of patients with P. falci parum infection recurrence by day 63 was 21.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.3%–22.8%), and the cumulative proportion with P. vivax infection recurrence was 31.5% (95% CI, 30.1%–33.0%). Significant risk factors for P. vivax infection recurrence were mixed infection at enrollment, male sex, younger age, lower hematocrit, higher asexual P. falciparum parasite density ( P < .001 for all factors), and P. falciparum gametocytemia at enrollment ( P = .001). By day 63, the cumulative risk of vivax malaria after P. falciparum monoinfection was 51.1% (95% CI, 46.1%–56.2%) after treatment with rapidly eliminated drugs (t 1/2 <1 day), 35.3% (95% CI, 31.8%–39.0%) after treatment with intermediate half-life drugs (t 1/2 1–7 days), and 19.6% (95% CI, 18.1%–21.3%) after treatment with slowly eliminated drugs (t 1/2 > 7 days) ( P < .001, by test for trend). Artemisinin-based combinations containing mefloquine or piperaquine, compared with the artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-atovaquone-proguanil combinations, were associated with a 3.6-fold to 4.2-fold lower adjusted hazard ratio for P. vivax infection recurrence within 63 days after pure or mixed P. falciparum infections ( P < .001, for comparisons with artesunate-mefloquine).

          Conclusions. On the Thai-Myanmar border, P. vivax is the most common cause of parasitological failure after treatment for falciparum malaria. Slowly eliminated antimalarials reduce the risk of early P. vivax infection recurrence.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Vivax malaria: neglected and not benign.

          Plasmodium vivax threatens almost 40% of the world's population, resulting in 132-391 million clinical infections each year. Most of these cases originate from Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific, although a significant number also occurs in Africa and South America. Although often regarded as causing a benign and self-limiting infection, there is increasing evidence that the overall burden, economic impact, and severity of disease from P. vivax have been underestimated. Malaria control strategies have had limited success and are confounded by the lack of access to reliable diagnosis, emergence of multidrug resistant isolates, the parasite's ability to transmit early in the course of disease and relapse from dormant liver stages at varying time intervals after the initial infection. Progress in reducing the burden of disease will require improved access to reliable diagnosis and effective treatment of both blood-stage and latent parasites, and more detailed characterization of the epidemiology, morbidity, and economic impact of vivax malaria. Without these, vivax malaria will continue to be neglected by ministries of health, policy makers, researchers, and funding bodies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Two fixed-dose artemisinin combinations for drug-resistant falciparum and vivax malaria in Papua, Indonesia: an open-label randomised comparison.

            The burden of Plasmodium vivax infections has been underappreciated, especially in southeast Asia where chloroquine resistant strains have emerged. Our aim was to compare the safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine with that of artemether-lumefantrine in patients with uncomplicated malaria caused by multidrug-resistant P falciparum and P vivax. 774 patients in southern Papua, Indonesia, with slide-confirmed malaria were randomly assigned to receive either artemether-lumefantrine or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and followed up for at least 42 days. The primary endpoint was the overall cumulative risk of parasitological failure at day 42 with a modified intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, trial number 00157833. Of the 754 evaluable patients enrolled, 466 had infections with P falciparum, 175 with P vivax, and 113 with a mixture of both species. The overall risk of failure at day 42 was 43% (95% CI 38-48) for artemether-lumefantrine and 19% (14-23) for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (hazard ratio=3.0, 95% CI 2.2-4.1, p<0.0001). After correcting for reinfections, the risk of recrudescence of P falciparum was 4.4% (2.6-6.2) with no difference between regimens. Recurrence of vivax occurred in 38% (33-44) of patients given artemether-lumefantrine compared with 10% (6.9-14.0) given dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (p<0.0001). At the end of the study, patients receiving dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine were 2.0 times (1.2-3.6) less likely to be anaemic and 6.6 times (2.8-16) less likely to carry vivax gametocytes than were those given artemether-lumefantrine. Both dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and artemether-lumefantrine were safe and effective for the treatment of multidrug-resistant uncomplicated malaria. However, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine provided greater post-treatment prophylaxis than did artemether-lumefantrine, reducing P falciparum reinfections and P vivax recurrences, the clinical public-health importance of which should not be ignored.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Mixed-species malaria infections in humans.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Infect Dis
                cid
                cid
                Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
                Oxford University Press
                1058-4838
                1537-6591
                01 March 2011
                01 March 2011
                : 52
                : 5
                : 612-620
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Global Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
                [2 ]Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Tak Province, Thailand
                [4 ]Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
                [5 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Tropical Medicine and AIDS and Center for Infection and Immunity, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Ric N. Price, MD, Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Darwin, NT 0811, Australia ( rprice@ 123456menzies.edu.au ).
                Article
                10.1093/cid/ciq249
                3060895
                21292666
                d5b6ffd7-7c64-47e0-9a16-8558056614e1
                © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2011. All rights reserved.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 September 2010
                : 17 December 2010
                Categories
                Major Articles and Commentaries

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article