24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Animal Agriculture and Climate Change in the US and UK Elite Media: Volume, Responsibilities, Causes and Solutions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Animal agriculture is a major producer of greenhouse gas emissions, equivalent to 14.5% of global emissions, which is approximately the same size as the transportation sector. Global meat consumption is projected to grow, which will increase animal agriculture’s negative impact on the environment. Public awareness of the link between animal food consumption and climate change is low; this may be one of many obstacles to more effective interventions to reduce meat consumption in Western diets, which has been proposed by many research institutions. This study analyzes how much attention the UK and US elite media paid to animal agriculture’s role in climate change, and the roles and responsibilities of various parties in addressing the problem, from 2006 to 2018. The results of the quantitative media content analysis show that during that period, volume of coverage remained low, and that when the issue was covered, consumer responsibility was mentioned more than that of governments or largescale livestock farms. In similar fashion, a range of options around personal dietary change was far more prominent in the media discussion of solutions than government policies, reforming agricultural practices or holding major animal food companies accountable for their emissions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers

            Food's environmental impacts are created by millions of diverse producers. To identify solutions that are effective under this heterogeneity, we consolidated data covering five environmental indicators; 38,700 farms; and 1600 processors, packaging types, and retailers. Impact can vary 50-fold among producers of the same product, creating substantial mitigation opportunities. However, mitigation is complicated by trade-offs, multiple ways for producers to achieve low impacts, and interactions throughout the supply chain. Producers have limits on how far they can reduce impacts. Most strikingly, impacts of the lowest-impact animal products typically exceed those of vegetable substitutes, providing new evidence for the importance of dietary change. Cumulatively, our findings support an approach where producers monitor their own impacts, flexibly meet environmental targets by choosing from multiple practices, and communicate their impacts to consumers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101775308
                Environ Commun
                Environ Commun
                Environmental communication
                1752-4032
                1752-4040
                14 January 2021
                2021
                07 September 2020
                08 March 2021
                : 15
                : 2
                : 153-172
                Affiliations
                [a ]College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA
                [b ]Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [c ]Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
                Author notes
                Contact Silje Kristiansen kristiansen@ 123456esf.edu ; silje.kristiansen@ 123456gmail.com College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, 1 Forestry Drive, 217 Baker Laboratory, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5739-7764
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4155-6243
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7419-6654
                Article
                EMS110463
                10.1080/17524032.2020.1805344
                7929601
                33688373
                d5d671a7-a8af-41f3-9da9-a31d9125b09d

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                animal agriculture,climate change,us and uk media,meat consumption,content analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article