22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ethnobiology of snappers (Lutjanidae): target species and suggestions for management

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this study, we sought to investigate the biology (diet and reproduction) and ethnobiology (fishers knowledge and fishing spots used to catch snappers) of five species of snappers (Lutjanidae), including Lutjanus analis, Lutjanus synagris, Lutjanus vivanus, Ocyurus chrysurus, and Romboplites saliens at five sites along the northeast (Riacho Doce, Maceió in Alagoas State, and Porto do Sauípe, Entre Rios at Bahia State) and the southeast (SE) Brazilian coast (Paraty and Rio de Janeiro cities at Rio de Janeiro State, and Bertioga, at São Paulo State.).

          We collected 288 snappers and interviewed 86 fishermen. The stomach contents of each fish were examined and macroscopic gonad analysis was performed. Snappers are very important for the fisheries of NE Brazil, and our results indicated that some populations, such as mutton snapper ( L. analis) and lane snapper ( L. synagris), are being caught when they are too young, at early juvenile stages.

          Local knowledge has been shown to be a powerful tool for determining appropriate policies regarding management of target species, and artisanal fishermen can be included in management processes. Other suggestions for managing the fisheries are discussed, including proposals that could provide motivation for artisanal fishermen to participate in programs to conserve resources, such as co-management approaches that utilize local knowledge, the establishment of fishing seasons, and compensation of fishermen, through 'payment for environmental services'. These suggestions may enhance the participation of local artisanal fishermen in moving to a more realistic and less top-down management approach of the fish population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fishing down marine food webs

          The mean trophic level of the species groups reported in Food and Agricultural Organization global fisheries statistics declined from 1950 to 1994. This reflects a gradual transition in landings from long-lived, high trophic level, piscivorous bottom fish toward short-lived, low trophic level invertebrates and planktivorous pelagic fish. This effect, also found to be occurring in inland fisheries, is most pronounced in the Northern Hemisphere. Fishing down food webs (that is, at lower trophic levels) leads at first to increasing catches, then to a phase transition associated with stagnating or declining catches. These results indicate that present exploitation patterns are unsustainable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The case for data-less marine resource management: examples from tropical nearshore finfisheries.

            Managing most marine finfisheries to achieve optimum yields is an unattainable dream. Protecting these resources from serious depletion through precautionary management seems the only practical option. But even this is of limited application if we demand scientific data for each managed fishery. There are too few researchers to do the work and, in any event, such research would usually not be cost-effective. Thus, we need not merely precautionary management; we need data-less management.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ignore fishers' knowledge and miss the boat

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Ethnobiol Ethnomed
                Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
                BioMed Central
                1746-4269
                2011
                16 March 2011
                : 7
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Fisheries and Food Institute (FIFO), UNISANTA, Santos, SP, Brazil
                [2 ]UNICAMP (Capesca and CMU, CP 6023, Campinas, SP), Brazil
                [3 ]CPDA-Rio de Janeiro (CNPq, PD), Brazil
                [4 ]ECOMAR, UNISANTA, Santos, SP,11045-040, Brazil
                [5 ]Institute for Nature Management, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 10 Fr. Skaryna Street, Minsk, 220114, Minsk, Belarus
                [6 ]Natural Resources Institute (University of Manitoba)Canada
                [7 ]Depto. Ecologia/UFRGS, CP 15007, 91501-970 Porto Alegre - RS, Brazil
                Article
                1746-4269-7-11
                10.1186/1746-4269-7-11
                3068939
                21410969
                d5e3309d-ec51-4a2e-bd5a-33e49ae33192
                Copyright ©2011 Begossi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 2 November 2010
                : 16 March 2011
                Categories
                Research

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article