8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Avoidance of abdominal compartment syndrome in damage-control laparotomy after trauma.

      Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
      Abdomen, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Colorado, epidemiology, Compartment Syndromes, diagnosis, etiology, prevention & control, Fascia, surgery, Female, Humans, Injury Severity Score, Laparotomy, adverse effects, mortality, Length of Stay, statistics & numerical data, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Organ Failure, Multiple Trauma, classification, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Suture Techniques, Trauma Centers, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a morbid complication of damage-control laparotomy. Moreover, the technique of abdominal closure influences the frequency of ACS. Retrospective cohort study. Urban level I trauma center. We studied 52 patients with trauma who required damage-control laparotomy during the 5 years ending December 31, 1999, and who survived longer than 48 hours. Abdominal compartment syndrome, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and multiple organ failure (MOF). Mean (+/- SD) age was 33 +/- 2 years; 38 (73%) were male. Mechanism of injury was blunt in 29 patients (56%), and mean (+/- SD) Injury Severity Score was 28 +/- 2. Development of ARDS and/or MOF was seen in 23 patients (44%); ARDS and MOF increased mortality from 12% (3/26) to 42% (11/26). Abdominal compartment syndrome was a common complication (17/52), and was associated with an increase in ARDS and/or MOF (12 patients [71%] vs 11 patients [31%] without ACS; P =.02, chi(2) test) and death (6 [35%] vs 8 patients [23%] without ACS). Primary fascial closure (n = 10) at the initial laparotomy was associated with ACS in 8 (80%) (P =.001, chi(2) test) and ARDS and/or MOF in 9 (90%) (P =.01, chi(2) test); skin closure (n = 25), with ACS in 6 (24%) and ARDS/MOF in 9 (36%); and Bogotá bag closure (n = 17), with ACS in 3 (18%) and ARDS/MOF in 8 (47%). Damage-control laparotomy is associated with frequent complications. In particular, ACS is a serious complication that increases ARDS and/or MOF and mortality. Avoiding primary fascial closure at the initial laparotomy can minimize the risk for ACS.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article