12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Drug-resistant Tuberculosis Receiving Bedaquiline- or Delamanid-Containing Regimens

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Bedaquiline and delamanid are newly available drugs for treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB); however, there are limited data guiding their use and no comparison studies.

          Methods

          We conducted a prospective, observational study among patients with MDR-TB in Georgia who were receiving a bedaquiline- or delamanid-based treatment regimen. Monthly sputum cultures, minimal inhibitory concentration testing, and adverse event monitoring were performed. Primary outcomes were culture conversion rates and clinical outcomes. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation and super learning were utilized to produce a covariate-adjusted proportion of outcomes for each regimen.

          Results

          Among 156 patients with MDR-TB, 100 were enrolled and 95 were receiving a bedaquiline-based (n = 64) or delamanid-based (n = 31) regimen. Most were male (82%) and the median age was 38 years. Rates of previous treatment (56%) and cavitary disease (61%) were high. The most common companion drugs included linezolid, clofazimine, cycloserine, and a fluoroquinolone. The median numbers of effective drugs received among patients on bedaquiline-based (4; interquartile range [IQR], 4–4) and delamanid-based (4; IQR, 3.5–5) regimens were similar. Rates of acquired drug resistance were significantly higher among patients receiving delamanid versus bedaquiline (36% vs 10%, respectively; P < .01). Adjusted rates of sputum culture conversion at 2 months (67% vs 47%, respectively; P = .10) and 6 months (95% vs 74%, respectively; P < .01), as well as more favorable clinical outcomes (96% vs 72%, respectively; P < .01), were higher among patients receiving bedaquiline versus delamanid.

          Conclusions

          Among patients with MDR-TB, bedaquiline-based regimens were associated with higher rates of sputum culture conversion, more favorable outcomes, and a lower rate of acquired drug resistance versus delamanid-based regimens.

          Abstract

          In a prospective, observational, cohort study of patients receiving bedaquiline- versus delamanid-based regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, those receiving bedaquiline had higher rates of sputum culture conversion and favorable outcomes and were less likely to develop acquired drug resistance.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin Infect Dis
          Clin Infect Dis
          cid
          Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
          Oxford University Press (US )
          1058-4838
          1537-6591
          01 November 2020
          12 November 2019
          12 November 2020
          : 71
          : 9
          : 2336-2344
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
          [2 ] National Center for Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Tbilisi, Georgia
          [3 ] Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory Rollins School of Public Health , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
          [4 ] Department of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
          [5 ] Departments of Epidemiology and Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
          Author notes
          Correspondence: R. R. Kempker, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Emory University School of Medicine, Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303 ( rkempke@ 123456emory.edu ).
          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-4996
          Article
          PMC7713674 PMC7713674 7713674 ciz1107
          10.1093/cid/ciz1107
          7713674
          31712809
          d5f28026-e3dc-465b-9692-030c2c665c53
          © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

          This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

          History
          : 02 August 2019
          : 04 November 2019
          : 08 November 2019
          : 17 December 2019
          Page count
          Pages: 9
          Funding
          Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI 10.13039/100000002;
          Award ID: K23AI103044
          Funded by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, DOI 10.13039/100000060;
          Award ID: R21AI122001
          Funded by: Fogarty International Center, DOI 10.13039/100000061;
          Award ID: D43TW007124
          Funded by: Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance;
          Award ID: UL1TR002378
          Funded by: International Science and Technology Center, DOI 10.13039/501100001744;
          Funded by: Emory Global Health Institute;
          Categories
          Major Articles and Commentaries
          AcademicSubjects/MED00290

          tuberculosis,culture conversion,multidrug-resistant,bedaquiline,delamanid

          Comments

          Comment on this article