20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Genetics of Neuropathic Pain from Model Organisms to Clinical Application

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Neuropathic pain (NeuP) arises due to injury of the somatosensory nervous system and is both common and disabling, rendering an urgent need for non-addictive, effective new therapies. Given the high evolutionary conservation of pain, investigative approaches from Drosophila mutagenesis to human Mendelian genetics have aided our understanding of the maladaptive plasticity underlying NeuP. Successes include the identification of ion channel variants causing hyper-excitability and the importance of neuro-immune signaling. Recent developments encompass improved sensory phenotyping in animal models and patients, brain imaging, and electrophysiology-based pain biomarkers, the collection of large well-phenotyped population cohorts, neurons derived from patient stem cells, and high-precision CRISPR generated genetic editing. We will discuss how to harness these resources to understand the pathophysiological drivers of NeuP, define its relationship with comorbidities such as anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders, and explore how to apply these findings to the prediction, diagnosis, and treatment of NeuP in the clinic.

          Abstract

          Calvo et al. discuss how applying genetic techniques, from model organisms to human populations, can help us understand the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain. These strategies could soon reveal novel analgesic drug targets and aid both personalized risk prediction and treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references156

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies

          Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) involve testing genetic variants across the genomes of many individuals to identify genotype-phenotype associations. GWAS have revolutionized the field of complex disease genetics over the past decade, providing numerous compelling associations for human complex traits and diseases. Despite clear successes in identifying novel disease susceptibility genes and biological pathways and in translating these findings into clinical care, GWAS have not been without controversy. Prominent criticisms include concerns that GWAS will eventually implicate the entire genome in disease predisposition and that most association signals reflect variants and genes with no direct biological relevance to disease. In this Review, we comprehensively assess the benefits and limitations of GWAS in human populations and discuss the relevance of performing more GWAS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Different immune cells mediate mechanical pain hypersensitivity in male and female mice.

            A large and rapidly increasing body of evidence indicates that microglia-to-neuron signaling is essential for chronic pain hypersensitivity. Using multiple approaches, we found that microglia are not required for mechanical pain hypersensitivity in female mice; female mice achieved similar levels of pain hypersensitivity using adaptive immune cells, likely T lymphocytes. This sexual dimorphism suggests that male mice cannot be used as proxies for females in pain research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neuropathic pain in the general population: a systematic review of epidemiological studies.

              Most patients with neuropathic pain symptoms present and are managed in primary care, with only a minority being referred for specialist clinical assessment and diagnoses. Previous reviews have focused mainly on specific neuropathic pain conditions based in specialist settings. This is the first systematic review of epidemiological studies of neuropathic pain in the general population. Electronic databases were searched from January 1966 to December 2012, and studies were included where the main focus was on neuropathic pain prevalence and/or incidence, either as part of a specific neuropathic pain-related condition or as a global entity in the general population. We excluded studies in which data were extracted from pain or other specialist clinics or focusing on specific population subgroups. Twenty-one articles were identified and underwent quality assessment and data extraction. Included studies differed in 3 main ways: method of data retrieval, case ascertainment tool used, and presentation of prevalence/incidence rates. This heterogeneity precluded any meta-analysis. We categorised comparable incidence and prevalence rates into 2 main subgroups: (1) chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics (range 3-17%), and (2) neuropathic pain associated with a specific condition, including postherpetic neuralgia (3.9-42.0/100,000 person-years [PY]), trigeminal neuralgia (12.6-28.9/100,000 PY), painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (15.3-72.3/100,000 PY), glossopharyngeal neuralgia (0.2-0.4/100,000 PY). These differences highlight the importance of a standardised approach for identifying neuropathic pain in future epidemiological studies. A best estimate of population prevalence of pain with neuropathic characteristics is likely to lie between 6.9% and 10%. Copyright © 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neuron
                Neuron
                Neuron
                Cell Press
                0896-6273
                1097-4199
                20 November 2019
                20 November 2019
                : 104
                : 4
                : 637-653
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
                [2 ]Neural Injury Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [3 ]Chronic Pain Research Group, Division of Population Health and Genomics, Mackenzie Building, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
                [4 ]The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA
                [5 ]Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
                [6 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, and John T. MacDonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
                [7 ]Dr. John and Anne Chong Lab for Functional Genomics, Camperdown, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [8 ]Departments of Anesthesia and Neurobiology, Children’s Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                Author notes
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author david.bennett@ 123456ndcn.ox.ac.uk
                [9]

                Present address: Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

                [10]

                These authors contributed equally

                Article
                S0896-6273(19)30791-3
                10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.018
                6868508
                31751545
                d6028460-b0f1-44b9-85d0-a7416cc3550b
                © 2019 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Neurosciences
                Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article