In air-breathing vertebrates at high altitude, fine-tuned adjustments in hemoglobin (Hb)–O 2 affinity provide an energetically efficient means of mitigating the effects of arterial hypoxemia. However, it is not always clear whether an increased or decreased Hb–O 2 affinity should be expected to improve tissue O 2 delivery under different degrees of hypoxia, due to the inherent trade-off between arterial O 2 loading and peripheral O 2 unloading. Theoretical results indicate that the optimal Hb–O 2 affinity varies as a non-linear function of environmental O 2 availability, and the threshold elevation at which an increased Hb–O 2 affinity becomes advantageous depends on the magnitude of diffusion limitation (the extent to which O 2 equilibration at the blood–gas interface is limited by the kinetics of O 2 exchange). This body of theory provides a framework for interpreting the possible adaptive significance of evolved changes in Hb–O 2 affinity in vertebrates that have colonized high-altitude environments. To evaluate the evidence for an empirical generalization and to test theoretical predictions, I synthesized comparative data in a phylogenetic framework to assess the strength of the relationship between Hb–O 2 affinity and native elevation in mammals and birds. Evidence for a general trend in mammals is equivocal, but there is a remarkably strong positive relationship between Hb–O 2 affinity and native elevation in birds. Evolved changes in Hb function in high-altitude birds provide one of the most compelling examples of convergent biochemical adaptation in vertebrates.
Summary: Evolved changes in hemoglobin–oxygen affinity in high-altitude birds and mammals provide striking examples of convergent biochemical adaptation.