34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Best--worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Statements like "quality of care is more highly valued than waiting time" can neither be supported nor refuted by comparisons of utility parameters from a traditional discrete choice experiment (DCE). Best--worst scaling can overcome this problem because it asks respondents to perform a different choice task. However, whilst the nature of the best--worst task is generally understood, there are a number of issues relating to the design and analysis of a best--worst choice experiment that require further exposition. This paper illustrates how to aggregate and analyse such data and using a quality of life pilot study demonstrates how richer insights can be drawn by the use of best--worst tasks.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Health Econ
          Journal of health economics
          Elsevier BV
          0167-6296
          0167-6296
          Jan 2007
          : 26
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, UK. terry.flynn@bristol.ac.uk
          Article
          S0167-6296(06)00049-X
          10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002
          16707175
          d6388afc-7f85-45fd-a006-dc62c397a7d9
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article