29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Studying human nociceptors: from fundamentals to clinic

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Chronic pain affects one in five of the general population and is the third most important cause of disability-adjusted life-years globally. Unfortunately, treatment remains inadequate due to poor efficacy and tolerability. There has been a failure in translating promising preclinical drug targets into clinic use. This reflects challenges across the whole drug development pathway, from preclinical models to trial design. Nociceptors remain an attractive therapeutic target: their sensitization makes an important contribution to many chronic pain states, they are located outside the blood–brain barrier, and they are relatively specific. The past decade has seen significant advances in the techniques available to study human nociceptors, including: the use of corneal confocal microscopy and biopsy samples to observe nociceptor morphology, the culture of human nociceptors (either from surgical or post-mortem tissue or using human induced pluripotent stem cell derived nociceptors), the application of high throughput technologies such as transcriptomics, the in vitro and in vivo electrophysiological characterization through microneurography, and the correlation with pain percepts provided by quantitative sensory testing. Genome editing in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived nociceptors enables the interrogation of the causal role of genes in the regulation of nociceptor function. Both human and rodent nociceptors are more heterogeneous at a molecular level than previously appreciated, and while we find that there are broad similarities between human and rodent nociceptors there are also important differences involving ion channel function, expression, and cellular excitability. These technological advances have emphasized the maladaptive plastic changes occurring in human nociceptors following injury that contribute to chronic pain. Studying human nociceptors has revealed new therapeutic targets for the suppression of chronic pain and enhanced repair. Cellular models of human nociceptors have enabled the screening of small molecule and gene therapy approaches on nociceptor function, and in some cases have enabled correlation with clinical outcomes. Undoubtedly, challenges remain. Many of these techniques are difficult to implement at scale, current induced pluripotent stem cell differentiation protocols do not generate the full diversity of nociceptor populations, and we still have a relatively poor understanding of inter-individual variation in nociceptors due to factors such as age, sex, or ethnicity. We hope our ability to directly investigate human nociceptors will not only aid our understanding of the fundamental neurobiology underlying acute and chronic pain but also help bridge the translational gap.

          Abstract

          Middleton et al. review advances in the molecular profiling, functional analysis and clinical assessment of human nociceptors. Improved knowledge of human nociceptor subpopulations, inter-species differences and mechanisms underlying hyper-excitability should ultimately translate to improved pain management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references242

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors.

          Differentiated cells can be reprogrammed to an embryonic-like state by transfer of nuclear contents into oocytes or by fusion with embryonic stem (ES) cells. Little is known about factors that induce this reprogramming. Here, we demonstrate induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic or adult fibroblasts by introducing four factors, Oct3/4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4, under ES cell culture conditions. Unexpectedly, Nanog was dispensable. These cells, which we designated iPS (induced pluripotent stem) cells, exhibit the morphology and growth properties of ES cells and express ES cell marker genes. Subcutaneous transplantation of iPS cells into nude mice resulted in tumors containing a variety of tissues from all three germ layers. Following injection into blastocysts, iPS cells contributed to mouse embryonic development. These data demonstrate that pluripotent stem cells can be directly generated from fibroblast cultures by the addition of only a few defined factors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors.

            Successful reprogramming of differentiated human somatic cells into a pluripotent state would allow creation of patient- and disease-specific stem cells. We previously reported generation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, capable of germline transmission, from mouse somatic cells by transduction of four defined transcription factors. Here, we demonstrate the generation of iPS cells from adult human dermal fibroblasts with the same four factors: Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc. Human iPS cells were similar to human embryonic stem (ES) cells in morphology, proliferation, surface antigens, gene expression, epigenetic status of pluripotent cell-specific genes, and telomerase activity. Furthermore, these cells could differentiate into cell types of the three germ layers in vitro and in teratomas. These findings demonstrate that iPS cells can be generated from adult human fibroblasts.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Molecular Architecture of the Mouse Nervous System

              Summary The mammalian nervous system executes complex behaviors controlled by specialized, precisely positioned, and interacting cell types. Here, we used RNA sequencing of half a million single cells to create a detailed census of cell types in the mouse nervous system. We mapped cell types spatially and derived a hierarchical, data-driven taxonomy. Neurons were the most diverse and were grouped by developmental anatomical units and by the expression of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. Neuronal diversity was driven by genes encoding cell identity, synaptic connectivity, neurotransmission, and membrane conductance. We discovered seven distinct, regionally restricted astrocyte types that obeyed developmental boundaries and correlated with the spatial distribution of key glutamate and glycine neurotransmitters. In contrast, oligodendrocytes showed a loss of regional identity followed by a secondary diversification. The resource presented here lays a solid foundation for understanding the molecular architecture of the mammalian nervous system and enables genetic manipulation of specific cell types.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Brain
                Brain
                brainj
                Brain
                Oxford University Press
                0006-8950
                1460-2156
                May 2021
                21 June 2021
                21 June 2021
                : 144
                : 5
                : 1312-1335
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford , Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
                [2 ] Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX 77030, USA
                [3 ] Department of Neuroscience and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, University of Texas at Dallas , Richardson, TX 75080, USA
                [4 ] Brain Function Research Group, School of Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg 2000, South Africa
                Author notes

                Steven J Middleton, Allison M Barry, Theodore J Price and David L Bennett authors contributed equally to this work.

                Correspondence to: David L. Bennett Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Oxford Oxford, UK E-mail: david.bennett@ 123456ndcn.ox.ac.uk
                Correspondence may also be addressed to: Theodore J. Price University of Texas at Dallas, Department of Neuroscience and Center for Advanced Pain Studies Richardson, TX, USA E-mail: theodore.price@ 123456utdallas.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0708-7335
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-6889
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9559-8839
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6857-9464
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3587-3103
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-2734
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-6221
                Article
                awab048
                10.1093/brain/awab048
                8219361
                34128530
                d644fe7f-7ffc-4878-b131-555312c6bd19
                © The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 21 September 2020
                : 26 November 2020
                : 08 December 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 24
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: NS111929
                Award ID: NS065926
                Funded by: Eugene McDermott Professorship;
                Funded by: NIH, DOI 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: CA200263
                Award ID: NS111929
                Funded by: Thompson Family Foundation Initiative;
                Funded by: H.E.B. Professorship;
                Funded by: Wellcome clinical scientist;
                Award ID: 202747/Z/16/Z
                Funded by: Wellcome Pain Consortium;
                Award ID: 102645
                Funded by: European Commission Horizon 2020;
                Award ID: ID633491
                Funded by: International Diabetic Neuropathy Consortium;
                Funded by: Novo Nordisk Foundation, DOI 10.13039/501100009708;
                Award ID: NNF14SA0006
                Funded by: Academy of Medical Sciences Starter;
                Award ID: SGL022\1086
                Funded by: Diabetes UK, DOI 10.13039/501100000361;
                Award ID: 19/0005984
                Funded by: Medical Research Council, DOI 10.13039/501100000265;
                Award ID: MR/T020113/1
                Funded by: Wellcome, DOI 10.13039/100004440;
                Award ID: 215145/Z/18/Z
                Funded by: GTC MSDTC Scholarship;
                Categories
                Review Articles
                AcademicSubjects/MED00310
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01870

                Neurosciences
                nociceptors,transcriptomics,ipsc derived nociceptors,patch-clamp,microneurography
                Neurosciences
                nociceptors, transcriptomics, ipsc derived nociceptors, patch-clamp, microneurography

                Comments

                Comment on this article