26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Personalized cancer screening: helping primary care rise to the challenge

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          With their longitudinal patient relationships, primary care physicians and their care teams are uniquely situated to promote preventive medicine, including cancer screening. A confluence of forces is driving the demand for the personalization of cancer screening recommendations. Recommendations are increasingly based on individual patient preferences, medical history, genetic and environmental risk factors, and level of interaction with the healthcare system. Current examples include choices between colonoscopy, fecal testing, and emerging tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening; the use of genetic information and availability of home self-testing in cervical cancer screening; the integration of multiple risk factors and patient preferences to decide the intensity and length of breast cancer screening; and the issues of smoking cessation and competing priorities when deciding whether or not to pursue lung cancer screening. These changes will inevitably increase the burden on primary care of providing high-quality cancer screening to their patients. To address, primary care physicians need access to continuously updated evidence reviews including prioritization of strongly supported recommendations, training in shared decision-making and tools for preference diagnosis, and an electronic health record (EHR) and reimbursement model that allow for population health management and team-based care. Only by reinforcing cancer screening in primary care can we ensure that personalized cancer screening is accessible and evidence-based.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Primary Care: Is There Enough Time for Prevention?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care?

            Despite the availability of national practice guidelines, many patients fail to receive recommended chronic disease care. Physician time constraints in primary care are likely one cause. We applied guideline recommendations for 10 common chronic diseases to a panel of 2,500 primary care patients with an age-sex distribution and chronic disease prevalences similar to those of the general population, and estimated the minimum physician time required to deliver high-quality care for these conditions. The result was compared with time available for patient care for the average primary care physician. Eight hundred twenty-eight hours per year, or 3.5 hours a day, were required to provide care for the top 10 chronic diseases, provided the disease is stable and in good control. We recalculated this estimate based on increased time requirements for uncontrolled disease. Estimated time required increased by a factor of 3. Applying this factor to all 10 diseases, time demands increased to 2,484 hours, or 10.6 hours a day. Current practice guidelines for only 10 chronic illnesses require more time than primary care physicians have available for patient care overall. Streamlined guidelines and alternative methods of service delivery are needed to meet recommended standards for quality health care.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

              The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography for current and former heavy smokers aged 55 to 80 years. There is little published experience regarding implementing this recommendation in clinical practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kevin.selby@hospvd.ch
                gillian.bartlett@mcgill.ca
                Jacques.cornuz@chuv.ch
                Journal
                Public Health Rev
                Public Health Rev
                Public Health Reviews
                BioMed Central (London )
                0301-0422
                2107-6952
                21 February 2018
                21 February 2018
                2018
                : 39
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2165 4204, GRID grid.9851.5, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, , University of Lausanne, ; Lausanne, Switzerland
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9957 7758, GRID grid.280062.e, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, ; 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8649, GRID grid.14709.3b, Department of Family Medicine, , McGill University, ; 5858 chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, 3rd floor, Montreal, Quebec H3S 1Z1 Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9096-0720
                Article
                83
                10.1186/s40985-018-0083-x
                5820801
                d652f908-7437-4a2b-8bd4-66003b36d788
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 11 October 2017
                : 19 January 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Swiss Cancer Research Foundation
                Award ID: BIL KFS-3720-08-2015
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Commentary
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                cancer screening,personalized medicine,population health,primary care

                Comments

                Comment on this article