3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Local- versus broad-scale environmental drivers of continental β -diversity patterns in subterranean spider communities across Europe

      1 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 4 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 17 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 23 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 1
      Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
      The Royal Society

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Macroecologists seek to identify drivers of community turnover ( β -diversity) through broad spatial scales. However, the influence of local habitat features in driving broad-scale β -diversity patterns remains largely untested, owing to the objective challenges of associating local-scale variables to continental-framed datasets. We examined the relative contribution of local- versus broad-scale drivers of continental β -diversity patterns, using a uniquely suited dataset of cave-dwelling spider communities across Europe (35–70° latitude). Generalized dissimilarity modelling showed that geographical distance, mean annual temperature and size of the karst area in which caves occurred drove most of β -diversity, with differential contributions of each factor according to the level of subterranean specialization. Highly specialized communities were mostly influenced by geographical distance, while less specialized communities were mostly driven by mean annual temperature. Conversely, local-scale habitat features turned out to be meaningless predictors of community change, which emphasizes the idea of caves as the human accessible fraction of the extended network of fissures that more properly represents the elective habitat of the subterranean fauna. To the extent that the effect of local features turned to be inconspicuous, caves emerge as experimental model systems in which to study broad biological patterns without the confounding effect of local habitat features.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments.

              Net primary productivity is a principal driver of biodiversity; large-scale regions with higher productivity generally have more species. This pattern emerges because beta-diversity (compositional variation across local sites) increases with productivity, but the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are unknown. Using data from a long-term experiment in replicate ponds, I show that higher beta-diversity at higher productivity resulted from a stronger role for stochastic relative to deterministic assembly processes with increasing productivity. This shift in the relative importance of stochasticity was most consistent with the hypothesis of more intense priority effects leading to multiple stable equilibria at higher productivity. Thus, shifts in community assembly mechanisms across a productivity gradient may underlie one of the most prominent biodiversity gradients on the planet.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                Proc. R. Soc. B
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                October 30 2019
                November 06 2019
                October 30 2019
                November 06 2019
                : 286
                : 1914
                : 20191579
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
                [2 ]LIBRe—Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
                [3 ]UMDI, Faculty of Sciences, UNAM National Autonomous University of Mexico, Sisal, Mexico
                [4 ]Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary
                [5 ]Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
                [6 ]Independent Researcher, Hummeltal, Germany
                [7 ]Ecole d'Ingénieur de Purpan, Toulouse, France
                [8 ]Amgueddfa Cymru National Museum Wales, Cardiff, UK
                [9 ]Institute of Zoology, University of Belgrade—Faculty of Biology, Belgrade, Serbia
                [10 ]Conservatoire d'Espaces Naturels de Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France
                [11 ]National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
                [12 ]Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey
                [13 ]Independent Researcher, Basque Country, Spain
                [14 ]Commissione Grotte ‘E. Boegan’, Società Alpina delle Giulie, C.A.I., Trieste, Italy
                [15 ]Independent Researcher, Blwd Kuzman Josifovski Pitu, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
                [16 ]OEKOTEAM – Institute for Animal Ecology and Landscape Planning, Graz, Austria
                [17 ]Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia
                [18 ]Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Eskişehir Technical University, Eskişehir, Turkey
                [19 ]Zoological Collection of Cyprus Wildlife Research Institute, Taşkent, Kyrenia, Cyprus
                [20 ]Emil Racovitza Institute of Speleology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
                [21 ]Romanian Institute of Science and Technology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
                [22 ]Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Sofia, Bulgaria
                [23 ]Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences & Biodiversity Research Institute, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
                [24 ]Croatian Biospeleological Society, Zagreb, Croatia
                [25 ]Department of Zoology & Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
                [26 ]Faculty of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Warszawa, Poland
                [27 ]Biology Centre CAS, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
                [28 ]Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
                [29 ]Verband der deutschen Höhlen- und Karstforscher e.V., Fulda, Germany
                Article
                10.1098/rspb.2019.1579
                6842848
                31662080
                d662c56b-2f49-489f-8725-c169ae877398
                © 2019

                https://royalsociety.org/-/media/journals/author/Licence-to-Publish-20062019-final.pdf

                https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article